Harry Reid Refuses To Allow Senate Panel To Investigate Benghazi… Gotta love these liberals. Obama refers to 4 dead Americans as ‘bumps in the road’ and dirty Harry considers trying to find out what happened ‘baseless partisan attacks.’ We refer to Harry as pond scum.

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

deepthinker November 17, 2012 at 3:06 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Of course each has their view of what went on. barry cant bring himself to call what happened September 11th and terror attack and harry wont let the truth come out if he can prevent it. Just like Watergate the more the lies came they less they where believable. Nothing else should happen within the Senate until there is a special prosecutor appointed to investigate what in the hell went on, who know what and why in the hell the administration tried to blame a stupid poorly made video.

RobertW November 17, 2012 at 3:38 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Well that settles it. Move along citizens, nothing to see here. That’s right, pay no attention at all. Nothing to see here. Back in line. Here, have another cup of kool-aid and put your blinders back on. Oooh look at the shiny president. Forward.

hisham November 17, 2012 at 4:32 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Harry Reid accuses Republicans of being partisan hacks!?! Uhhhh….ummmm
POT-KETTLE-BLACK!

poppajoe49 November 17, 2012 at 5:39 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

All Harry is doing now is trying to protect the country from Obungles getting removed from office and Joe Biteme taking the reins.

RobertW November 17, 2012 at 6:27 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

at least Joe was born in the U.S.A.

Progressive Hemrrhoid November 17, 2012 at 7:59 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

This has reached the point of totally sickening. So what’s next? Charges of racism?

RobertW November 17, 2012 at 9:36 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

since taxpayers pay his salary, why the hell don’t they fire this despicable honky-ass cracker?

I'm With STUPID November 18, 2012 at 2:09 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Democrat Leaders favorite saying:”I choose at this time to use my 5th amendment rights and not answer this question at this time as it may incriminate me.”

RobertW November 18, 2012 at 2:31 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

i ut you. you’re close, but not really on target, the dems almost NEVER have to invoke the 5th, simply because they’re so well covered by the negros against anyone coppin a plea, as well as the all crime liquors us. not to mention the billary pillorization of the vast right wing conspiracy, which led specifically to the re-pube-ican inferiority noggin’ oucher moderates.

i give you a bronze star, only cuz if’n i gave you a gold star the libs’d redistribute it to themselfish selves.

poppajoe49 November 18, 2012 at 6:06 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

“the dems almost NEVER have to invoke the 5th”

Because they never get prosecuted!

flashingscotsman November 18, 2012 at 12:39 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Or even investigated.

Lanny November 18, 2012 at 11:13 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

A House Speaker exercising all the powers the position holds could easily bring Harry Reid to heel. Just punish democrats until Reid squeals like Ned Beatty.

Is there anything in the Constitution that says House democrats have to be given committee assignments?

Is there anything in the Constitution that says democrats have to be allowed to use the Speaker’s time to speak on the floor of the House?

Is there anything in the Constitution that says the House has to pass an omnibus budget instead of just passing funding for each executive department one bill at a time?

Too bad the People’s House is being led by the Amazing Ball-less Wonder.

poppajoe49 November 19, 2012 at 4:51 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

That’s a good idea, but I’m afraid it will just allow the teleprompter in chief to issue more exec orders.