HideYourStarOfDavid.jpg
Jews not safe in Copenhagen. “Hide your Star of David” says the headline. Because of the danger of violence from Muslim immigrants, Danish police are telling Jews to forego wearing skullcaps and other outward signs of their religion in Denmark’s capital and biggest city. We hate to sound harsh, but Europe has become a giant toilet that needs flushing.

{ 64 comments… read them below or add one }

CO2Insanity December 15, 2012 at 9:29 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0

Instead of Arab Spring it sounds like Arab Krystallnacht.

flnative52 December 15, 2012 at 9:32 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0

Coming to your city soon….

RobertW December 15, 2012 at 9:53 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0

to late, they’re already there.
weren’t you paying attention?

poppajoe49 December 16, 2012 at 4:29 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0

True, we do seem to import lots of culture from Europe.
How lonf will it be before this is the standard for the US?

Sidekick December 15, 2012 at 10:04 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

Shakespeare was a head of the curve.

JPTravis December 15, 2012 at 10:21 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

Dang, why didn’t I think of that line?

CO2Insanity December 15, 2012 at 10:54 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Who cut the cheese?

drb December 16, 2012 at 2:42 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

Must have been JP

JPTravis December 16, 2012 at 7:16 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

E tu, drb?

drb December 16, 2012 at 7:43 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

You’re supposed to say “excuse me”…that’s manners

RobertW December 16, 2012 at 7:50 am
flashingscotsman December 17, 2012 at 9:59 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

Just to be on the safe side, I always say excuse me BEFORE cutting the cheese.

RKae December 16, 2012 at 12:44 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0

Can anyone think of another instance where an enemy moved into the midst of a civilization, looked the people in the eye and said, “We’re going to erase your culture and replace it with our own…”

…and the people just chuckled and replied, “Oh, you don’t really mean that”?

This is really getting weird. Political correctness is going to go down in the history books as the most self-destructive religion ever.

Big Al December 16, 2012 at 3:20 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0

I am not so sure that they will be publishing books.

KimmyQueen December 16, 2012 at 1:33 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Yes… if not explicitly at least implicitly and people did not take it seriously and acted too late. Japan essentially did that to Korea. It is my understanding with some measure of success. Not 100% if Koreans didnt take them seriously but if they did they did so at their peril. Europeans did it to the Natives living in the North, Central and South Americas. Many Natives did not think that they would be overrunned and they were. Europeans did it to many African countries. Many Africans did not think they would be overruned either. Mohammed and all successive Islamic leaders did it to pretty much most of the Middle East and great number of African countries and are now doing it to Europe and elsewhere. The Romans did it to the Greek even though they did admire Greek culture. Alexander the Great under the belief that he was doing the world service by spreading Hellenic culture did it. Others after him did it. Persians did it, before the Persians, Babylonians. Hitler wrote in his book that he was going to do what he essentially did, people didn’t believe him and didnt take him seriously. Islamic leaders essentially told that to Jefferson, in that one case Jefferson said HELL NO. One very remarkable distinction, however, we no longer have Jeffersons and Washingtons in our midst. It is part of the annals of history and people all in all it seems are not learning from it. Whenever someone comes along and tells a civilization through actions and/or words that they are going to destroy it and take over, or people know that that is their mandate, and choose to not act to stop it (unlike Jefferson for one) we get what we get. It is weird that people are so stupid but hey what can we do?

RKae December 16, 2012 at 2:04 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

There’s a difference in European colonialism: They arrived in a country and said, “Look at all the goodies we have for you – medicine, railroads, better architechture, products and trade, modern business practices, high-tech weapons to repel that other tribe you don’t like…” (This can be said of the Roman expansion ["Yeah, Reg, remember what the city used to be like!"], or any instance where a high-tech society meets a mud-hut society.)

What do Muslims have to offer Europe but medieval thinking, backward lifestyles and misery? And yet the Europeans are letting them swamp the continent. So how is it that this time it was the mud-hut society overrunning the high-tech society?

All the Europeans can get out of it is the moral thrill of telling themselves “I’m a good little, left-wing, holier-than-thou, PC believer.” It’s the joy of self-loathing, and it’s demented.

Sidekick December 16, 2012 at 2:41 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

Cultural and moral relevancy are so ingrained there and increasingly so here.

flashingscotsman December 17, 2012 at 10:06 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

You would think at least the women would be up in arms against Islam.

RobertW December 17, 2012 at 1:05 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

imo they’re not because islam is all about slavery of the mind.
if they (the lib females) could be honest about it with themselves, they’d see that it is via the teachings of Jesus that we’ve come to the point of (at least in the U.S.) an enlightened outlook re: gender equality as well as skin-color equality. perhaps i should say a “more-enlightened” outlook, than that which other religions offer/teach.

idk if this makes sense, and i’m not trying to preach here, i’m just thinking about social ramifications of various world religions.

KimmyQueen December 17, 2012 at 1:33 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Those that are up in arms get shot in the head or beheaded or dropped from helicopters or stoned or buried and then stoned… you get what I am trying to get at? It doesn’t pay to be up in arms against Islam WHILE living in an Islamic country for that means the end of the woman’s life. The least that could happen to her would be to be raped and then ostricized because according to them it would be her fault, or a cast be placed on her entire body for years preventing her from leaving the house (yes that has happened). The least least she can loose her children if she has children and be divorced and live in poverty as her family will not take her back.

As long as women have NO PROTECTION against abuse or mistreatment or death women AS A WHOLE will not feel safe to speak out against Islam. There is TOO MUCH TO LOOSE and very little gain for women to speak out against Islam. Women are nothing under Islam. They are less than nothing. As far as we know many women hate it, but there is nothing for them for them to speak out against it.

Edit: If you meant Liberal women in this country then yes of course you are rigt that it is incredible they don’t speak to the real war on women in those countries.

RobertW December 17, 2012 at 1:58 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

the women in islam are thoroughly indoctrinated into that culture. it is the very few who’ve come into contact with western philosophy regarding education first then growing from there, who are speaking against the inherent suppression of human rights in islam. not merely women’s rights.

islam’s “creator” didn’t endow everyone with the same inallienable rights, right? only a select few, yeah?
Jefferson certainly knew the difference between religion and islam.

KimmyQueen December 17, 2012 at 2:09 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

He had no powers to designate that. The god that used an “angel” to announce himself to Momo, was very sparse on rights given as well. A little stingy I may say. And for anyone out there that is all like YWH wasn’t for rights for women have not read a Bible (yes the First and Second Testaments) and know nothing. YWH was very free with His freedoms for both genders, He was just being REAL about how the rights would affect us if we did not KEEP IT REAL with Him.

RobertW December 17, 2012 at 2:15 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

yes! that’s my point, only better said. ty

flashingscotsman December 18, 2012 at 8:20 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

Way back when I posted that above, we were speaking of women here, and that’s the women I spoke of. Just to clarify.

RobertW December 18, 2012 at 11:07 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

women here? do you mean in the west?
if so consider the women who rock the cradle, the ones’ who coo to the chilluns

if the hands that rock the cradle are cooing tolerance, then the chilluns will vomit that right back into they mama face, it is what it is.
if, on the other hand, the hand that rocks the cradle teaches truth, then the babes may/probly will speak truth back to them.
what is truth?
i know. it’s unchangeable, regardless of what clinton thinks. piss be upon her.
hillbarry full of space.

also, 10 mins in a room, just me and soetero or however he/it’s spelling the name these days
10mins in a room, no secret service.
mano a puto.

por favor.
also, i will need sani-wipes afters.

flashingscotsman December 19, 2012 at 10:08 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

Or full de-con.

KimmyQueen December 17, 2012 at 2:06 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

However in many cases the original culture was downtrodden or destroyed or almost destroyed to be completely replace by the invading culture. However Islam will always be the worst (along side Nazim and Communism of course)

Karmaa December 16, 2012 at 3:27 am

Controversial. What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1

Well guys, I am flying to Germany later today. Not that it has anything to do with this story, but it was the closest segue I saw! I’ll be back in a few weeks. If I don’t “see” you on another thread – merry Christmas or happy Hanukkah, or have a great holiday, or whatever. <3

poppajoe49 December 16, 2012 at 4:36 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Have a wonderful time Karmaa.
My niece and her husband are there, he’s in the Army. They are spending their first Christmas in Germany, and she is enjoying herself. She tells me that the people are so friendly, and that there are lots of Christmas Festivals, and they are really having a nice time.

drb December 16, 2012 at 4:44 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1

Have a safe flight, Karmaa…Merry Christmas to you and yours. If you run into my BFF and her family tell them Merry Christmas for me and that Kirby (their dog) misses them but is doing well, here with me.

poppajoe49 December 16, 2012 at 5:04 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

MUWAH!!
{_}3

drb December 16, 2012 at 5:31 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1

Oh, thank you, Poppa.

danybhoy December 16, 2012 at 5:10 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Safe travels.

ooddballz December 16, 2012 at 5:17 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

What part?

RobertW December 16, 2012 at 7:06 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

be safe, have fun, keep your wits about you, and always look for a way out.

:) good advice whenever one visits family for the holidays yeah?

flashingscotsman December 16, 2012 at 7:15 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

I hope your trip goes well, and don’t worry about us. We’ll be ok for a couple of weeks.

KimmyQueen December 16, 2012 at 1:33 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

Have a nice and safe trip and Merry Christmas.

perlcat December 17, 2012 at 8:13 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Safe travels!

sa_rose December 18, 2012 at 9:43 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

Have a great trip! Be careful. Enjoy Christmas Eve in Germany. I hear its FABULOUS!

Plainsman December 16, 2012 at 6:29 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

The MSM is all over this, right? NO? Well, surprise, surprise, surprise!

JPTravis December 16, 2012 at 7:18 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0

I doubt very much your average MSM consumer has any idea that Europe is being overrun with Muslims.

RobertW December 16, 2012 at 7:20 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

I doubt very much your average MSM consumer has any idea

what a europe is.

CO2Insanity December 16, 2012 at 10:14 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

It’s the opposite of a myope.

KimmyQueen December 16, 2012 at 1:23 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

So…. instead of deporting the insane Muslims, make it EXTREMELY difficult for people to immigrate and stay there and instead of advicing citizens to arm themselves… and other very practical and normal solutions to the problem at hand, you are going to advice people to hide their religions and essentially be religious hypocrites and/or cowards. How is this okay? This makes NO SENSE. That is NOT A SOLUTION to the problem at hand. Do something about the aggressors do not curtail the rights and freedoms of those who are being trangressed upon. What is wrong with people?

Sidekick December 16, 2012 at 1:25 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

That would involve confronting Muslims. It doesn’t work like that.

KimmyQueen December 16, 2012 at 1:36 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Jefferson did it. The Marines did it. In many many ways to great great success. Pretty much stayed the Global caliphate that the Muslims were hoping to achieve. There is nothing wrong in getting rid of aggressors. Especially get rid of them overseas so they wont get here. Unfortunately as Rkae stated above it is political correctness that will self destroy western civilization.

Sidekick December 16, 2012 at 1:51 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Exactly. PC. Also fear of winding up like Theo Van Gogh.

RobertW December 16, 2012 at 2:48 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

Theo’s health deteriorated in the months after the death of his brother. He was admitted to the Willem Arntz Hospital, a psychiatric hospital, in Den Dolder on 18 November 1890.

really.

KimmyQueen December 17, 2012 at 1:37 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

Uhm… ok…

perlcat December 17, 2012 at 1:47 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Robert’s run low on his meds, (either that, or he’s ran high on them…) and is non-sequituring us to the *other* Theo Van Gogh’s brother, Vinny.

RobertW December 17, 2012 at 2:00 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

point is they’re both dead.

KimmyQueen December 17, 2012 at 2:10 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

Okies…

KimmyQueen December 17, 2012 at 2:10 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

I was wondering…

poppajoe49 December 16, 2012 at 5:39 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Because to confront Muslims would be culturally insensitive, and we all know that can’t happen these days. We must suck Muslim ass in order to not offend them. Screw everyone else.

deepthinker December 16, 2012 at 2:25 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

So where is the tolerance from the Muslims of the world? It is those who are Jewish and Christians who are told that we must be tolerant of other religions. It’s been centuries since the crusades where fought over the Holly Land. It has been those of islam who have set about to slaughter the Jews and Christians through out the world. They sided with the Axis powers and have been at war with all other beliefs from the conception of Islam.

It’s time that they accept us. The Dutch are learning what happens when you allow multi-cultural societies. One wishes to force it’s beliefs upon the others.

It’s time to fight back and bloody the lips of those who wish to pick a fight.

barbiegirl ny December 16, 2012 at 5:47 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

Yes, Europe is a big cesspool, but, sadly, we’re not too far behind in so many ways.

perlcat December 17, 2012 at 8:15 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

I’d say we are worse — they can at least make the claim that they didn’t see it coming.

sa_rose December 18, 2012 at 9:50 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

Theoretically we have constitutional protection against something like this. It is abridgin our right to practice our religion. But the reality is that Muslim extremists’ practice of their religion includes wiping out all other religions. Now how are we to handle that constitutionally? A constitution isa piece of paper. It is worthless if not enforced. The old USSR had a constitution too, for all the good it did its citizens. We have a government who has chosen to only enforce certain parts of the constitution for certain groups. That has been the case since the inception of the country. In this situation, we are enforcing freedom of religion for Muslims, een extremist Muslims who have stated they want to destroy the country, to the exclusion of other religious groups, from Christian to Hindu, to Sikhs. And we all stand around, too polite to bitch about it. We are destroying ourselves faster than the Muslims are destroying us.

KimmyQueen December 18, 2012 at 10:13 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

“But the reality is that Muslim extremists’ practice of their religion includes wiping out all other religions. Now how are we to handle that constitutionally?”

Very astute and interesting view point and question.

Their religion does mandate the extermination of others and the control of others through their religious based laws. If we were to follow the Constitution’s protection of freedom of religion then of course that means that we should allow them to do just that, which means that going after Bin Laden and Al-Quaeda was unconstitutional…

PERHAPS if we go literal here…

HOWEVER, Jefferson himself then went unconstitutional as he founded the Marines to essentially wipe out the efforts of Islamists back then, so protecting ourselves from this is not without a precursor.

The point is then that freedom of religion does not take precendence over protection of the bodily forms and lives of the citizens of the country. I agree with that and I am sure that everyone in their right mind would agree with that.

At some point we have to exercise righteous and wise judgement over what is appropriate and what is not appropriate and we have to stand by individual and group freedom. There is no USA if we allow Islamists to have their way it will completey destroy the POINT of the USA. So even if literally speaking we are being unconstitutional by creating and implementing and launching the Marines to end piracy, slavery and other evil acts that some groups can actually point to their religion to state that it is part of it is in my opinon the right thing to do. Nobody with a mind would agree that allowing injustice and violence to continue because people are doing it in the name of their god, is the way to go.

But it is very interesting discussion indeed.

JPTravis December 18, 2012 at 1:00 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

I’ve always said the same thing about communism. Both communism and Islam are inimical to a free society, so letting them stand alongside other viewpoints and allowing them free expression rights and organization rights and free association… well, it’s suicidal. At some point we as a nation have the moral duty to activate our treason laws and prosecute people who advocate such systems. There is precedent: Germany specifically outlawed Nazism after World War II and they take that law very seriously. As far as I can see having that law against Nazism hasn’t interfered with their freedom at all.

Sidekick December 18, 2012 at 1:30 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Pithy answer: once another’s religious practices trample over another’s right to worship freely, the state may step in and protect the latter’s rights. That would keep human sacrifices out of the 1st Amendment protection arena. The only way a Muslim can really impact is through threats, which would be a denial of liberty and potentially life. That can’t stand in a free society.

RobertW December 18, 2012 at 1:43 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

momento por favor

whereas islam is an ideology, and
whereas ideologyis ideology, and
whereas religion is religion
therefore, though oft the twain shall meet, they shall never be the same.
whereas religion is religion
therefore, though oft the twain shall meet, they shall never be the same.

sidekick, re mussleman’s threats.

sharia usa

that is all.

Sidekick December 18, 2012 at 1:53 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Then that solves the Constitution question.

flashingscotsman December 18, 2012 at 8:24 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

Works for me.

{ 1 trackback }