King Barry at his coronation:”Preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action,”: Wrong O Duce. It requires Presidents bound by the Constitution. It requires an executive branch that doesn’t legislate away -by fiat- those rights of the individual that were God’s to grant and no man’s to take away.

{ 27 comments… read them below or add one }

redabogado January 21, 2013 at 3:48 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Remember El Duce #1. Sure a few (thousands) were murdered, but the trains ran on time in Italy!!!!

Missile Command January 21, 2013 at 4:00 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

The only individual freedoms Chairman O seems anxious to expand on are his own:
– freedom from congressional oversight
– freedom to start wars as he pleases
– freedom to spend as he damn well pleases when he damn well pleases
– freedom from following laws he considers inconvenient
– freedom to lie to the American people
– freedom from answering hard questions
– freedom to raid the treasury and give taxpayer money to his cronies

MDLION January 21, 2013 at 4:33 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

King Barry’s inauguration “coronation” and the mob there today bring to mind a scripture:

“[A]bout us the wicked strut
and in high place are the basest of men.” -Psalm 12:9

Not so silent January 21, 2013 at 4:59 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

“collective?” what is he the Borg? Sorry Barry but I ain’t part of no collective, nor am I part of your fan club, In fact I detest you, your lunatic fringe friends and your smart ass cocky attitude…. Pretty much Barry you go bugger yourself and the equine convenience you rode in on…

poppajoe49 January 22, 2013 at 6:35 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

No, he married a Borg.

pink Floyd January 21, 2013 at 5:41 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

If he’s not careful, he’s going to get some collective action.
It just won’t be the action that he expects.

jcrowley1985 January 21, 2013 at 5:43 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

It requires presidents bound by the constitution; presidents like Ron Paul.

pink Floyd January 21, 2013 at 6:12 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

“It requires presidents bound by the constitution”
Thumbs up on this part!!!

“presidents like Ron Paul.”
Holy Shit! You are a Fucking broken record. Get over it already!

DefHarryMelon January 21, 2013 at 10:02 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Whistle will never stop as long as he knows people see his shit. It is so old and tiring. We’ve asked for relief by administrative action to ban turdball, but we cannot expect it. If everyone, and by that I mean each and every single one of the regulars would simply not respond to him at all, just thumb down and not even read it, he might stop showing up because if nobody gives him anything in response, it won’t feed his petty need for attention. But it seems we can’t do that.

ooddballz January 21, 2013 at 10:07 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Sorry Harry, as annoying as the little turdball is, I will NOT call for banning him. TD and MO yes, but banning him is akin to censorship, and I can’t condone that.

PsychoDad January 21, 2013 at 10:33 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Ballzy, in many circumstances I would agree with you, but in this case, it’s not like he’s even bringing meaningful to the table, not even anything we can snicker about, let alone some substantial point on which to hang a discussion. Remember Princess Bedpan? At least she raised interesting and relevant topics, which we all enjoyed cutting to ribbons. Creepycrawly doesn’t even approach that. He’s like a scratch on a record (yikes! How long will THAT be understood?!?) that does nothing but interrupt a song with a blob of noise. Or the drip you can hear from the bathroom sink in the middle of the night. Nothing but a minor irritation which doesn’t even merit the attention it demands. It’s effectively NOTHING. And you can’t censor NOTHING.

poppajoe49 January 22, 2013 at 6:39 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Problem is, he’s annoying, he’s stupid, but he hasn’t done anything to get banned for.

flashingscotsman January 22, 2013 at 9:49 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

The people I’ve seen banned from this site gave VERY good reason for their banishment. Crawley is just annoying and stupid.

TD,………………………MO.

PsychoDad January 22, 2013 at 11:19 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Annoying & stupid would be reason enough in my book.

When IS the last time we heard from Princess Bedpan, anyway? Did she finally collapse into a black hole of idiocy?

Not so silent January 22, 2013 at 3:41 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

She had a relapse of rectal/cranial inversion and this time it took, it can not be reversed. She is now unable to type since she can not focus on a keyboard…..

drb January 22, 2013 at 3:44 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I think she got banned…no way she could stay away this long by her own choosing…good riddance I say.

poppajoe49 January 22, 2013 at 5:38 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I doubt banning happened, most likely got tired of fighting with people smarter than her. It must suck to lose every argument.

drb January 22, 2013 at 5:58 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

well poppa you are entitled to you opinion of curse…but you have to remember, she thinks she won those arguements. and there is no way she wouldn’t have come back to gloat over the fraud in chief’s being voter frauded back into office, unless something outside of her control happened to prevent her from doing so.

sa_rose January 22, 2013 at 3:43 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

She had claimed she was ill. Maybe it was more serious than she let on. Maybe she got tired of being completing destroyed in her liberal idiocy. Haven’t heard from her in a while, and I don’t think she could read and not respond.

PsychoDad January 21, 2013 at 10:26 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Shuttup, creepycrawly.

poppajoe49 January 22, 2013 at 6:36 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Ron Paul couldn’t get elected president, not even of his own fan club!

deepthinker January 21, 2013 at 6:42 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I thought collective was code for communist attitude. And all the lap dogs just sucked it all up.

The wolf has removed its cloak and now is bearing its teeth.

Sidekick January 21, 2013 at 7:50 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

He used to speak like that before he got involved in national politics. There is a now well known series of radio interviews that he did the 1990s. Had the media done its job in 2007, he likely would never have been nominated.

poppajoe49 January 22, 2013 at 6:41 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Had the media done its job in 2007, he likely would never have been nominated.

I’d like to believe that, but have my doubts.

deepthinker January 22, 2013 at 4:09 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

I’ve heard them. Again from British web sites. He is a true communist and its impossible to deny it. Someone with in the opposition must step forward and challenge him at every step. Otherwise he’s going to ram his “agenda” down all our throats. Right now it looks like the one willing to challenge him is Rand Paul in the Senste. As for the House we are looking for the champion of the average people not the roll over dogs that are there now.

sa_rose January 22, 2013 at 3:45 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Does anyone have a link to hear those interviews? I would certainly like to hear them or at least read transcripts.

Big Al January 22, 2013 at 4:56 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

”Preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action.”- That sounds like something from “Animal Farm” or “1984″.