Mel’s problem is that he was speaking about one specific reporter when he should have been making a generalization.
Subscribe, tweet, share, tell a friend!
Browse before and after this article
OLDER: D’oh-bamaNEWER: Delusional Keith Olbermann defends his rapidly eroding ratings
Related Posts
- Chicago Democrat calls tax protests shameful, neglects to mention her convicted tax-cheat husband
- John Gibson: Huffington Post better lawyer up!
- Obama picks his nose on national television
- Morning Joe replaces Red Eye as the funniest program on television
- 49% of registered voters tire of all-Obama-all-the-time on television
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
it’s obvious from this that Richards is nothing more than a far-left, bleeding heart, tree-hugging —-sucker on a witchhunt, with the white male Christian figure (Gibson) being hung up from the nearest oak tree. Richards deserved that comment — and worse.
Mel should have realized he was still on camera and on a mic. Not to say that the guy wasn’t one it is just that Mel should have used proper decorum to make his point. It is time to move on and he made his apologies if people want to continue having hang ups on it then it is their problems not his.