Comments on: Loser lefty talker wants Limbaugh to die

By: Michigan Man

Michigan Man — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:30:38 +0000

What is unbelievable is that we have a GOOD example of how badly communism ends right here in recent history. I think they called it the USSR? These morons think there is a happy medium there somewhere. They are SMARTER then Lenin or Mao. Hell, they had to wait until there was nothing left but waste in their countries and then they overthrew them.
Ask anyone from the Russian monarchy about how communism starts. Oh wait… you cannot ask them… they were all murdered by the communists. Hmm…
I see that “Progressive” left. I guess he did not want to debate the FACTS. Oh yeah.. libs spell “FACTS” this way: “ACORN”….

By: Michigan Man

Michigan Man — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:26:15 +0000

Here! Here!
Let’s give our founding fathers a big salute for having the foresight to draft up the Bill of Rights.
Fight the good fight, brother.

By: Michigan Man

Michigan Man — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:25:22 +0000

Well, we can hope that the foundation for our republic is enough to hold onto when they strip away the rest of our rights.
The only hope I have is that they will not have the Supreme Court, (and Sotomayor), decide on whether the Bill of Rights can be overturned. I am sure that is where they want to head next after shoving government healthcare down our throats.

By: Michigan Man

Michigan Man — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:09:48 +0000

WOW! Thanks for opening my eyes to the two of these issues in such a new light. Seriously. I had an inkling but what you say is spot-on.
I am the one who should be wearing the helmet now.
I have always held the belief that the reason the left wants the word “marriage” is so they can begin to tear at the fabric of the Christian church.
Like I said before. If they want a “CIVIL UNION” that will allow them the same rights as me and my heterosexual partner, (I.E. my wife), then fine. But somehow that does not suffice them. They want the word along with it. What if we change the word “marriage” to “scrambled eggs”? I think it would not matter to them. They want whatever we want to call it for some reason.

By: Michigan Man

Michigan Man — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:02:40 +0000

Good call.
I am not tolerating the left shoving their agendas down my throat.

By: Michigan Man

Michigan Man — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:01:41 +0000

Hey doofus..
There is a nifty little button in ALL cars that says, “Band”. That is not to pick a different “band” to listen to, as in a different song….
It is choose between FM and AM radio, libtard.
Sheesh! Now we have to teach them how to use a radio! What’s next? How to run a goevernment “OF the people and BY the people”… Oh wait… Yeah. We do need to show them that too.

By: danybhoy

danybhoy — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:30:24 +0000

Even as a retard(BTW,I am wearing a helmet)I understand that socialism is for everyone, EXCEPT THE SOCIALIST. Do as I say, not as I do. One set of rules for you, one for the elites & ruling classes.

The other thing you might not know is that freedom is the solutution to the human condition. That might explain that we as a free nation, was able to become the greatest power in the history of the world in a very short time.

As for your crack about gay marriage, lets talk about marriage…& guns. There is nowhere in the constitution about marriage of any kind. It was more or less a social norm & religious contract, but since it is not adressed in the constituion, it goes to the states. That’s why the age of consent differed from state to state, & now whether states will recognize gay marriages from other states. Why do I bring this up with guns? Because the 2nd Admendment is about the right to bear arms, so when Senator John Thune, R;SD introduced a bill that would allow someone who has a legal conceal-carry permit to carry legally nationally, it was opposed & defeated by the many of the same people who want a gay marriage performed in SanFran or Vermont to be recognized in Texas or Utah. Even though guns are in the constution & marriage, gay or otherwise, is not. So much for our constitutional rights.

By: danybhoy

danybhoy — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:12:38 +0000

Those who demand tollerance from others are the least tollerent among us. Not mention that the least liberal minded people I know are liberals. Think about it.

By: danybhoy

danybhoy — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:31:37 +0000

HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE…

Mike Malloy is a petty & angry little man. I have listened to this clown on XM-167 more then a few times, & all I ever hear from him is absolute hatred of anything & anyone left of Hugo Chavez. He yells & swaers on the air all the time(but not crossing the FCC lines of decency) about Rush, about Bush, about capitalism, & he bemoans the fact that he has trouble staying on the air. I listen & laugh AT HIM not with him, but he wears thin very quickly.

I’m supprised he has’nt been offered a gig on BSNBC yet. I guess when they sack Special Ed, Malloy can take his 70something year old @$$ & have a stroke on live television. Must see TV.

Note to “progressive”, have a look into the history American progressivism starting in the early 20th century. Not too much to differentiate it from the crap in Russia my family fled back around the time of the Bolshevik revolution. Don’t kid yourself, “progressivism”/socialism/marxism/statism/collectivism always goes too far & ends very badly. Authoritarianism will be the result.

By: wes

wes — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:46:32 +0000

Michigan Man,
Thank you for your fight against these fascists.
Our new motto should be the old motto,
“DON’T TREAD ON ME!”