<<
>>


New York newspaper to list more gun permit holders after uproar. Self-righteous journ0listic attention cravers drum up more controversy as they do anything to get their way and “serve the public”… but mostly to get their way. The Rockland County Times delivers some pushback: “What You Don’t Know About the Agenda-Driven Journalists in Your Neighborhood.”

Contributed on December 29, 2012 by Bonfire of the Absurdities, who has submitted 2890 posts.

{ 30 comments… read them below or add one }

StrinaM December 29, 2012 at 9:34 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

Awesome Rockland County Times!

Plainsman December 29, 2012 at 9:38 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0

This is a blasphemous attack on law abiding gun owners that should not be tolerated. It’s so bad that I’d think a class action suit could be brought against this rag that could destroy it.

CO2Insanity December 29, 2012 at 9:40 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0

I think it would be hilarious of a bunch of gun owners got together and started following these people and their families around 24 x 7, videotaping their every move and posting it on a website.

Missile Command December 29, 2012 at 2:21 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

THAT would effectively stop these creeps. They are all cowardly in character. They are never challenged so they post whatever they deem negatively fit about those that they despise. But if it happened to THEM, they, the ones so pure in motive as the driven snow (in their minds only), why, this could not be tolerated. The postings would be quietly stopped and they’d go back to reporting on AGW, or abortion rights, or what Obama had for breakfast and what picture of him is best.

KimmyQueen December 29, 2012 at 4:59 pm

Controversial. What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1

I would totally do that if I didnt have a life or if I got paid.

matthew s harrison December 29, 2012 at 10:24 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0

When the bloggers start listing their college daughters’ dorm room numbers and photographs(and their turn-ons), maybe the leftist hack “journalists” will stop-then again, they are shit-all-stupid on the left-so they will probably risk their families’ lives to make their anti-gun points known.

Zezozose December 29, 2012 at 11:05 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

What if a paper listed schools without armed guards?

Progressive Hemrrhoid December 29, 2012 at 11:35 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

Gannett Corp needs to be sued out of existence.

danybhoy December 31, 2012 at 3:58 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Corporate greed is what they are about. Don’t you know?

sa_rose January 3, 2013 at 9:39 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

SHHHH!

Missile Command December 29, 2012 at 2:13 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

Amazing match to a stereotype! The pictures of these smarmy, arrogant journOlists women, and of course their attitude, matches exactly the picture I conjure up of know-it-all, Obama-loving, abortion-promoting NYC women.

deepthinker December 29, 2012 at 2:47 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0

Then they should have their children’s schools listed. It’s public record as well. While at it list their home addresses, banks, cars and anything else that’s floating out there.

poppajoe49 December 29, 2012 at 5:16 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

Maybe posting the car make, color, and license plate numbers for the editorial staff.

Martin December 30, 2012 at 8:35 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

Journos are 90% liberals, so I can understand how they would justify this illiberal invasion of privacy: “The people’s right to know.” What I can’t understand is how newspapers can infuriate tens of thousands of law -abiding private citizens at a time and not realize why forty percent of newspaper jobs have disappeared in the last ten years. This year, the Gallup Poll reported, and the Pew Center confirmed, that three out of five Americans put little or no trust in the MSM. Yet, I have been unable to find any serious consideration by MSM’rs about why that is so, when the reasons are so obvious to everybody else.

danybhoy December 30, 2012 at 12:02 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

What needs to happen is that these people need to shunned from civil society. They need to be verbally abused by people in public for their actions. They need to feel uncomfortable in public, & they need to know they are not welcome. Time to turn the table on these assholes.

barbiegirl ny December 30, 2012 at 10:26 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

I still say that they’re doing a great service to gun owners everywhere. I, for one, would think twice about unlawfully entering the home of anyone “outed” in this pathetic piece of journalism. If anything, they’re aiding and abetting the criminal, who would likely avoid the homes on this list, and go to the neighbor who’s not. Too bad these “journalists” aren’t as tenacious in exposing the raw sewage known as our government.

poppajoe49 December 30, 2012 at 10:52 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

What about the people that have guns that aren’t registered?
Many guns were purchased before registration was required.

Alien December 30, 2012 at 1:33 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Great point.. I was thinking the same thing.. Its just public data, but now easier for criminals to pick their targets– the gun free homezones

KimmyQueen December 30, 2012 at 2:10 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

Any evil person who wants to do a free shopping spree at someone’s house would just avoid the areas with great red dots and go to the places where there are no red dots. They say that the public needs to know… know what? That their neighbor is a law abiding person that has a weapon that could be used to defend even the neighbor in need? So obviously they are looking out for the publlic that is either deranged or criminal. Liberals don’t care about public safety if it undermines their agenda.

poppajoe49 December 30, 2012 at 3:39 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

Prepare for a crime spree at the houses where there are no red dots.
Also prepare for shootouts in the gun free zones, when criminals run into each other trying to rob the same houses.
This is nothing more than a map for cat burglars to plan their future heists.

Alien December 30, 2012 at 3:55 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

LOL there’s some wacky hijinks in there.. Sounds like a good comedy heist plot

KimmyQueen December 30, 2012 at 4:25 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1

If this happens and people (especially children) die and it can be proven that the criminals went to those homes because of the maps who pays for the those that die? who pays for the property lost? who pays for lives hurt? Will it be Bush’s fault?

If anything these maps are prime to mark gang territories as well where gangs see no purpose in messing with the red dot areas and move their bases and activities to the no red dots. The no red dots schools are now primary target thanks to these idiots… heck not just for thiefs and gang members but also pedophiles and serial rapists. Stake out a house where parents are not there most of the time AND they have no weapons that the girl could get to, to defend herself. If any of these things happens (hopefully not) who then pays for that?

flashingscotsman December 30, 2012 at 5:34 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

Of course it will be Bush’s fault.

poppajoe49 December 30, 2012 at 6:27 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

Yes, because he didn’t outlaw guns when he was President.

sa_rose January 3, 2013 at 9:43 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

That was my take Kimmy. They may as well have put out a welcome mat for the unarmed homes. THOSE are the people who should besuing. Their level of safety has been seriously compromised by this action. I DO feel this is an invasion of privacy, but then I figured if I had a gun in my home, and someone wanted to “out” me about it, I would encourage them to list my firearms training and a quote to the effect “yes, I am a gun owner and I am not afraid to use it.”

Not so silent January 1, 2013 at 4:32 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

There’s an update on Drudge, it appears the paper has hired ARMED security guards because the names and addresses of the employees were published in a bunch of places on line….OH NO………………There’s GUNS at the newspaper, are they going to publish a list of the gun owners they hired for security?

Sidekick January 1, 2013 at 4:39 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

Good. They ought to be made to live with the consequences of their actions.

KimmyQueen January 1, 2013 at 5:20 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

You have to be kidding me…! This is insane.

poppajoe49 January 1, 2013 at 6:41 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

Of course not, that might compromise their security and the guard’s privacy!

Neo-7 January 1, 2013 at 5:26 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

This is hypocrite approved—

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/01/journal-news-hires-armed-security-guards-153103.html

{ 1 trackback }