Here’s all the evidence you need – if you still needed any — to convince yourself that the New York Times sees the world differently than you do.
After the stock market dropped nearly 400 points upon hearing Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner’s vague outline of his “stimulus” plan, The Times seemed to blame the decline on television’s talking heads.
“Initial reviews for the man and his plan were not good, however. Stock markets slid through the day, perhaps spurred downward by withering punditry on the business-news cable channels faulting Mr. Geithner for not providing more details, particularly on stemming home foreclosures. Senators of both parties lodged similar complaints at a hearing.”
Next week the Times has scheduled an article blaming Captain Sullenberger for running into those poor geese.
Subscribe, tweet, share, tell a friend!
Browse before and after this article
NEWER: Barbara Boxer more interested in the floor of her house than the floor of the Senate
Related Posts
- New York prostitution expert says we’ve been screwed by the Secretary of the Treasury
- New York Times loves unions (unless they’re New York Times unions)
- Hypocrisy x bias = New York Times
- New New York Times motto: Better late than never
- New York Times willingly humiliates itself
for Jon Stewart
