
Ssssssh! Don't tell any of Thomas Friedman's liberal friends that he supports the American military
Thomas Friedman of the New York Times thinks Obama should accept the Nobel Peace Prize on behalf of the American military.
Hey, wait. Is this April 1? Nope. Just checked the calendar and it’s October 14. The only other option is that Friedman has had an extremely rare moment of clarity.
What follows are words you never thought you’d see from Friedman and/or the Times:
Let me begin by thanking the Nobel committee for awarding me this prize, the highest award to which any statesman can aspire. As I said on the day it was announced, ‘I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who’ve been honored by this prize.’ Therefore, upon reflection, I cannot accept this award on my behalf at all.
But I will accept it on behalf of the most important peacekeepers in the world for the last century — the men and women of the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps.
I will accept this award on behalf of the American soldiers who landed on Omaha Beach on June 6, 1944, to liberate Europe from the grip of Nazi fascism. I will accept this award on behalf of the American soldiers and sailors who fought on the high seas and forlorn islands in the Pacific to free East Asia from Japanese tyranny in the Second World War.
… Until the words of Isaiah are made true and lasting — and nations never again lift up swords against nations and never learn war anymore — we will need peacekeepers. Lord knows, ours are not perfect, and I have already moved to remedy inexcusable excesses we’ve perpetrated in the war on terrorism.
But have no doubt, those are the exception. If you want to see the true essence of America, visit any U.S. military outpost in Iraq or Afghanistan. You will meet young men and women of every race and religion who work together as one, far from their families, motivated chiefly by their mission to keep the peace and expand the borders of freedom.
So for all these reasons — and so you understand that I will never hesitate to call on American soldiers where necessary to take the field against the enemies of peace, tolerance and liberty — I accept this peace prize on behalf of the men and women of the U.S. military: the world’s most important peacekeepers.
Thomas Friggin’ Friedman supports the U. S. military? Proof positive that there is a God.
Source: New York Times
Subscribe, tweet, share, tell a friend!
Browse before and after this article
NEWER: Good news! The United States isn’t the only country committing national suicide
Related Posts
- We pause now to honor another outstanding black American who deserves the Nobel Peace Prize
- NBC cancels series before it deserves it, Obama gets Nobel prize before deserving it. It’s just that kind of day.
- Quote of the Day: President Obama, the Nobel Prize and the World Series
- Deciding vote on Obama Nobel Peace Prize cast by radical Socialist and KGB informer
- Saluting Democrat Steve Kagen, the only member of Congress who won’t accept federal healthcare benefits

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! SURRRE they support the military…since WHEN? Not during the Bush years for SURE!
And oh yeah, it would really go over well if Obama accepted the prize on behalf of the military…like those who gave him the prize would accept that…or like Obama would really DO that anyway.
The problem is these people loathe the military. Especially the elected Democrats…..
That is awesome! Of course, it will never happen and what we will hear is another speech all about Egobama but the piece by Friedman is proof that even the left is waking up. It may be too late but it is happening.
Nice. He’s accepting the prize on behalf of the men and women in service – BUT
“I will accept this award on behalf of the American soldiers who landed on Omaha Beach on June 6, 1944, to liberate Europe from the grip of Nazi fascism. I will accept this award on behalf of the American soldiers and sailors who fought on the high seas and forlorn islands in the Pacific to free East Asia from Japanese tyranny in the Second World War.”
Aren’t the aforementioned the very people whose health care he proposes to ration?