Obama and Chavez are now bros

SO OBAMA SHOOK CHAVEZ’S HAND…SHOCK!…HORROR!

I watched Obama address the press following the Conference of the Americas. Overall, from a public relations point of view, Obama did well in the manner in which he presented the US position. Subsequently, I heard the commentaries on CNN about Obama having shook Chavez’s hand. I then came to the conclusions, “sense” for Obama and “nonsense” coming from the mainstream US media.

It seems to me that the American public is being dumbed down by the quality – sorry – lack thereof – with regard to what passes as serious US journalism. If anyone in the so-called “ US quality media” weighed a few facts, then so much arrant nonsense passing as serious US journalistic commentaries would not be continually fed to the unsuspecting US public and the very suspicious wider world. The real main issues are, and still remain, human survival in the Americas, the threat of the increase of WMDs in the Americas and the approach of any nation in the Americas that insists on increasing production of same, and the economic conditions giving rise to global warming. Consider, by reference to the first point of concern – Russia is not today exactly America’s closest friend. Russia, for argument’s sake, has nuclear weapons that can blow the US up five times over and the US has weapons that can blow Russia up ten times over. Neither country can use those weapons and survive, not even one nuclear weapon is useable against the other, but the US still refuses to sign certain international treaties to ensure reduction and/or an end to future production of these useless weapons ( i.e. “useless” in the sense that Mutually Assured Destruction is the result if the weapons are ever deployed in force). But, let’s put that observation aside for the moment. Given the global nuclear status quo, we, not long ago, found President Bush with bionic vision looking into the heart of Vladimir Putin. When Bush focused he assured us that when he looked into Putin, and let me not misquote this important optic operation, and let surgeon Bush speak of his results: “ I looked into his heart. He is a good man.” But, Bush never stopped there, he needed post-operative continued assessment of the patient, went further, and continued entertaining Putin at the Bush Ranch. Now, Venezuela has about one-six hundredth of the military arsenal that the US has and is no military threat to the US, except for Chavez consistently saying that US post-war polices have served significantly to make Latin American and Caribbean nations economically dependent and impoverished ( which is the truth). For speaking the truth Chavez then becomes a national security threat in the hemisphere. Even a greater threat, shock and horror, when Obama sensibly and diplomatically shakes Chavez’s hand to try and cool political frictions. Contrast – Russia still has the nuclear weapons as does the US. There was not so long ago a hot-war fought in Georgia, when the US sought to install weapons on Russia’s doorstep. Now, viewed in light of the broader mix of global realties – is Obama’s hand shake –or – even hand shakes with Chavez, such a big deal in the wider scheme of things?

Would it make some sense to canvass in the Americas the idea of a nuclear weapons free zone along the lines of the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone Treaty? Could the Americas set a precedent that then invites the world to extend this agreement to the Arctic and Baltic Seas? But, as we know, big powers need big weapons, and if the big mistake is made in the Americas by way of the biggest power holding the biggest weapons ever using them – then, we are assured of big disaster. Thus, sensibly, should our leaders not all be talking in a timely way about these types of issues which impinge on human existence and survival on the planet?

But, sorry, all of this is off the CNN screen, is not part of any mainstream script or commentary, and is not likely to be weighed as a part of any “serious” reflection that is likely in any sustained way to feature on CNN, NBC, ABC or in any other “serious” media. Days of media reel and script will be taken up on the big question – should Obama have shaken Chavez’s hand? Ah! well, what it is to blog in “stupid bliss” and not be a part of the “serious media” commentaries and discussions. David Gergen, CNN’s senior political analyst had his say and did say, “ Obama’s handling of Chavez was a no no.” Hmmm, how profound.

But David, is it really such a bad thing that Barack cooled the heat a bit in the hemisphere with a hand shake and Hugo, being Hugo, shared a copy of the book: “ Open veins of Latin America” by Eduardo Galeano?

Sorry, shouldn’t have asked that question, and promise in future to keep the debate on your level David, a “serious” level.

__________________________________________________________________
Courtenay Barnett is a graduate of London University. His areas of study were economics, political science and international law. He has been a practising lawyer for over twenty years, has been arrested for defending his views, and has argued public interest and human rights cases. His web site: http://www.globaljusticeonline.com

Reply to this comment

Who shakes hands like that? Did I fall into a time-warp and fall back into the 1970s or something?

Reply to this comment

oc madman – I respond in this way.
1. I do recall the Cuban Missile crisis and a very good reference point in support of the position I have adopted on arms reduction and ultimate elimination of these WMDs.
2. I also recall the recent events in Georgia where the US was provoking a situation that the Russians responded to with military force. A sort of proxy attack by the US, and one might make comparisons with Cuba as Russia’s proxy at the time of the Cuban missile crisis. Recall the deal to remove the missiles from Turkey etc.
3.Now we focus on Chavez:-

i) Recall Washington’s quick response in seeking to support the coup against Chavez and the backlash and quick reversal when the Latin American nations reacted against this overthrow.
ii) I need to see hard evidence to support your statement “Chavez is a serious threat to the United States, and the western hemisphere.”

IN RESPONSE TO THE STATEMENT QUOTED FROM YOUR POST, PLEASE ANSWER:-

a. In what way or ways is Chavez “a serious threat”?
b. What precisely has he done or can he do that constitutes a direct threat to the US. You cite Russia’s association with Venezuela, but is this in substance any different from Georgia’s involvement with the US. By contrast I do not foresee any installation of missiles pointing at the US, but if you have the evidence and specifics then please indicate as best you know.
c. Likewise for the Hemisphere – where is this great threat to the entire Hemisphere coming from Venezuela under Chavez. The petro-Caribe deal it seems to me provided a lot of much needed cheaper and subsisdised oil to many needy countries, in a way comparable to Cuba’s doctors and medical personnel around the Hemisphere – is this the great threat to which you refer.

Obama seemed to me perfectly pragmatic and practical in pointing out that if Cuba was sending doctors, but US aid did not quite measure up then the situation needed to be reconsidered.

“OC madman” quite frankly, I see a far greater threat in any move towards greater weapons productions than I do in subsidized oil deals or medical personnel providing their services across the Hemisphere. But – enlighten me – where is this great threat – beyond Chavez being a bit of a blabber mouth?

Reply to this comment