<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Stimulus stupidity: kiss your hard-earned tax dollars goodbye</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ihatethemedia.com/ten-stimulus-stupidity-projects/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ihatethemedia.com/ten-stimulus-stupidity-projects</link> <description>Exposing liberal media bias with humor and satire</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:40:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Administrator</title><link>http://www.ihatethemedia.com/ten-stimulus-stupidity-projects/comment-page-1#comment-15161</link> <dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:12:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihatethemedia.com/?p=25485#comment-15161</guid> <description>Good catch. I hadn&#039;t even thought of that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch. I hadn&#8217;t even thought of that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lanny</title><link>http://www.ihatethemedia.com/ten-stimulus-stupidity-projects/comment-page-1#comment-15149</link> <dc:creator>Lanny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:51:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihatethemedia.com/?p=25485#comment-15149</guid> <description>I gotta agree with Dan. Every citation was prefaced with a disclaimer that the information was from Republicans. WTF? Was the information correct, or wasn&#039;t it? All of it sounded like the usual pork-barrel nonsense we&#039;re used to. But she made it sound like the Republicans just made the story up.Why doesn&#039;t CNBC just do the damned legwork and find out what the money was spent on? What&#039;s next? I&#039;m gonna turn on The Weather Channel and hear &quot;Republicans have reported a tornado on the ground in Wichita! So if you&#039;re a Republican, take shelter. If you&#039;re a Democrat, it&#039;s great day to do some lawn work.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta agree with Dan. Every citation was prefaced with a disclaimer that the information was from Republicans. WTF? Was the information correct, or wasn&#8217;t it? All of it sounded like the usual pork-barrel nonsense we&#8217;re used to. But she made it sound like the Republicans just made the story up.</p><p>Why doesn&#8217;t CNBC just do the damned legwork and find out what the money was spent on? What&#8217;s next? I&#8217;m gonna turn on The Weather Channel and hear &#8220;Republicans have reported a tornado on the ground in Wichita! So if you&#8217;re a Republican, take shelter. If you&#8217;re a Democrat, it&#8217;s great day to do some lawn work.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan-the-man with a better plan</title><link>http://www.ihatethemedia.com/ten-stimulus-stupidity-projects/comment-page-1#comment-15115</link> <dc:creator>Dan-the-man with a better plan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:22:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihatethemedia.com/?p=25485#comment-15115</guid> <description>I love it. CNBC is so bad at getting real news and real facts that they have to go to the &quot;Senate Republican Communications Center&quot; to get the correct information. Then the reporter tells the audience several time that the facts are from the &quot;SRCC&quot; as though it is not a reliable source. So if she thinks that they are not reliable, why is she using them? Why don&#039;t they go out and do their own investigation? I&#039;m surprised that they even carried the story.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it. CNBC is so bad at getting real news and real facts that they have to go to the &#8220;Senate Republican Communications Center&#8221; to get the correct information. Then the reporter tells the audience several time that the facts are from the &#8220;SRCC&#8221; as though it is not a reliable source. So if she thinks that they are not reliable, why is she using them? Why don&#8217;t they go out and do their own investigation? I&#8217;m surprised that they even carried the story.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 16/26 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.ihatethemedia.com @ 2010-03-21 20:00:52 -->