The Socialist mask of Marxism. “In November, the United States will indeed face one of the most important elections in its history. On the surface, the voters will decide which of our two main political parties will control the White House and the U.S. Congress. In fact, the voters will chose between keeping the country the leader of the Free World, or allowing the United States to be further infected by the virus of Marxism.” Having once lived under it, Ion Mihai Pacepa doesn’t like it. Experience is the best teacher.

{ 24 comments… read them below or add one }

michaelht1 June 6, 2012 at 12:24 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 28 Thumb down 1

Choice? Obama is a fraud, anti American, thief in the night.
https://www.iardc.org Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Committee. It’s the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois; and they are very strict and mean as hell. (Talk about irony.) Even I, at the advanced age of almost 65, maintain (at the cost of approximately $600/year) my law license that I worked so hard and long to earn.
Big surprise.

Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and U.S. President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address.

Consider this:

1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A “Voluntary Surrender” is not something where you decide “Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?” and forget to renew your license. No, a “Voluntary Surrender” is something you do when you’ve been accused of something, and you ‘voluntarily surrender” your license five seconds before the state suspends you.

2 Michelle Obama “voluntarily surrendered” her law license in 1993. after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud!

3. So, we have the first black President and First Lady – who don’t actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.
Source: http://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/

4. A senior lecturer is one thing, a fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law Professor at the University of Chicago.

5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) “served as a professor” in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

6. “He did not hold the title of Professor of Law,” said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

Source:http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html;

7. The former Constitutional Senior Lecturer (Obama) cited the U.S. Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence … not the Constitution.

8. The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/

9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal.

10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?

When you are a phony it’s hard to keep facts straight.

BobontheJob June 6, 2012 at 2:04 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 19 Thumb down 0

Excellent thread Michaelht1 – I learned something new today – thanks!

Questionman June 6, 2012 at 3:42 pm

Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike? Thumb up 1 Thumb down 36

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

FormerlyDeanH June 6, 2012 at 3:52 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 15 Thumb down 1

Read the racism of this putz. One more thumb please. Put putz away.

Questionman June 6, 2012 at 4:04 pm

Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike? Thumb up 1 Thumb down 26

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

FormerlyDeanH June 6, 2012 at 4:05 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0

Sure thing dave.

Notsosilent June 6, 2012 at 4:11 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0

It appears Questionmutt is like Obama, He may not always be right, but by God he is never wrong……I see he is a disciple of Jesse Jackson too, trying to race bait. Oh well they walk among us….Unfortunately

PsychoDad June 6, 2012 at 6:12 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0

On the contrary, I would love to see Herman Cain or Allen West in the White House in preference to ANY white Demonrat.So take your cheesy, lying racebait, shove it up your ignorant ass, and GTFO so the grownups can talk.

flashingscotsman June 7, 2012 at 7:23 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0

I’d rather see Cain in the White House than any of the white guys on the REPUBLICAN side that stayed in the Primary race.

FormerlyDeanH June 7, 2012 at 7:54 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

I liked Santorum a lot too, maybe actually a little more than cain, but his ability to defeat burok may well have been insufficient. Cain coulda done it, I think.

poppajoe49 June 7, 2012 at 2:31 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

I was 100% for Cain from the beginning, and only backed Santorum when Cain was forced out by the Obama slander machine.
I still think he’s a better option, but wouldn’t mind seeing him or Allen West as VP,

flashingscotsman June 8, 2012 at 9:39 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

But,…but,….but,….. Us racist Conservatives couldn’t POSSIBLY want to see a black man in the White House, could we?

A good black man, yes.

Elrond Hubbard June 6, 2012 at 6:00 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0

“He’s [Obama] brought 36 consecutive months of growth to the overall economy.”

Thanks Questionman, we all needed a good laugh.

poppajoe49 June 7, 2012 at 6:02 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

Well, I’ll give him credit, he has lots of questions, but all his answers are wrong!

sa_rose June 8, 2012 at 6:07 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

And how proudly he posts all his drivel like we haven’t heard it all and proved most of it wrong over and over and over again. Must be a new hire for the summer.

FormerlyDeanH June 6, 2012 at 2:16 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0

And the proggies laugh at anyone suggesting there is any similarity to this and our current condition and that the occupant with his cronies and the rinos are not conducting anything of this sort. Liberalism is a dementia.

Progressive Hemrrhoid June 6, 2012 at 3:35 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0

Maybe between Fundraisers and Campaign Stops “Dear Leader” should go and actually read the Constitution and the bill of rights. That is if he isn’t too busy smoking crack, and looking in the mirror to remind himself how great he is.

Big Al June 6, 2012 at 4:16 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

Psalm 112:10 The wicked shall see it, and be grieved; he shall gnash with his teeth, and melt away: the desire of the wicked shall perish. Some say that the Psalms are prophetic and I believe that they are. So in October, the tenth month, he will know that he is done.
He would know now but I guess that he is delusional.

deepthinker June 6, 2012 at 4:51 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0

People who have lived under oppression have seen right through barry and his cronies. They know what it is like to have no freedoms and having to look over their shoulders for the KGB or secret police. barry is no different. Those on the left need for once to listen to someone who has actually been there and done that, yet I know that they wont, they all feel that his majesty lord barry is better than those from the past. Yet they are doomed to repeat the errors of those from the past, believing a lying communist bastard.

As for reading and understanding the Constitution, it’s a document that just limits what they are attempting to do to this nation and those of us who love our freedoms and rights.

Joe June 6, 2012 at 5:31 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0

The only flaw I see is that Mittens is not a vote for restoring Constitutional freedoms both parties have taken away. Sure he might get rid of the EPA or something, but other than that he is a liberal Republican. I may want and may try to project my Libertarian/Conservative beliefs on him, but the fact is he is a liberal Republican.

For instance I see the growing police state as a major concern to our rights granted under the Constitution. Mitt does not. He has regularly supported all the laws passed since 9/11 that have taken away our rights. He may say a few good things on taxes or entitlements, but I think he will also lead us down the Socialist/Marxist road, only it won’t be so obvious.

PsychoDad June 6, 2012 at 6:13 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0

Baby steps.

Joe June 7, 2012 at 3:45 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0

I just don’t know how effective baby stepping our way out of the roaring river of socialism is, it seems to me that we may drown. I think we need to grow up, make a right turn, and head for the shoreline.

poppajoe49 June 7, 2012 at 6:08 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

The baby steps are getting the Socialist out of power, then we can work on the new guy’s policy decisions.

sa_rose June 8, 2012 at 6:10 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

I’d rather have a liberal Republican than a Marxist. Besides isn’t a liberal Republican actually a Moderate? Let’s face it, we need to be willin to negotiate on the little stuff, stand our ground on the big stuff or we can’t get ANYTHING. Look at the current Congress.