
Unemployment moves sharply higher after election. “It is unclear what caused the increase in the unemployment rate in November,” says Gallup. Here’s a thought that occurs to us, Gallup: maybe the unemployment rate reported before the election was a dastardly lie to ensure a certain ineffective president’s re-election.
{ 48 comments… read them below or add one }
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
12
0
Gosh, it’s almost like the figures were being manipulated to make the Dear Leader look good, isn’t it? That kind of crap only happens in totalitarian shitholes….
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
10
0
Was going to say, amazing what happens when the true numbers come out. But even bringing this up is raaaaaaacist!
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
7
0
Were the correct numbers posted before or after Eric the Red’s DOJ threatened Gallup?
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
12
0
Moving higher? You ain’t seen sh!t. Wait until the market really reacts to Obama & his merry band of economic retards. 15% unemployment could be here things go to plan for the regime.
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
10
0
Merry band of economic retards! LMAO!
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
9
0
I’m pretty sure the rate is already 15%. They’ve been lying for four years, fewer people are working than when he took office, and they’ve been simply reducing the size of the workforce to make the rate look lower: http://www.jpattitude.com/120204.php
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
8
0
I think the real rate (U6) around 15%, but I’m talking the offical reported rate.
Like or Dislike:
6
0
I’ve seen charts that claim that real unemployment is over 20%. I imagine that the true number is between 15% and 22%. How many “never employeds” are out there living off of the welfare state? I bet millions.
Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike?
0
9
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
Speaking of “never employeds”, look who’s here!
Like or Dislike:
3
0
You would think by now either Cheeto’s or the people who make blow up sex dollas would have hired him as their spokes-it/man/woman/whatever.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
But then, he would have to work for a corporation!
Like or Dislike:
2
0
My business isn’t incorporated, but then again, I would let him work for me.
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
10
0
Uh Oh, Looks like California finally reported their unemployment numbers!
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
9
0
Here is something I should have had in the prior post. Obama met with several of the hosts from MSNBC about the “fiscal cliff”…
http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/12/west-wing-confab-for-liberal-media-151064.html
…this tells me a coulpe of things…
1. That MSNBC is a gov’t sponsered enity. There is ZERO seperation, & the folks at MSNBC will regret this meeting down the road.
2. That Obama is not serious about improving the economy. He does’nt know anyone who understands economics, & therefore, he will never get any good advice. Does’nt matter now, the morons gave him another 4 years, & I hope he sticks it to them where it hurts.
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
7
0
> I hope he sticks it to them where it hurts. <
I tend to agree with that sentiment but a lot of Romney voters are going to be dragged under, too.
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
8
0
I know, but we are now in addiction mode. Sad part, you need to hit bottom, & the last 4 years of idiocy were not enough to hit bottom. I am afraid to see what that will be, & I just hope we can recover afterwards.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
First step, you have to admit you have a problem. All these tards are still running around thinking Obama is going to fix things.
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
9
0
I would have been ok with it if he had also invited Neil Cavuto, Lou Dobbs and John Stossel.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
I would pay money to see those three duke it out with the MESSNBC crowd.
Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike?
1
17
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
10
0
Yep, you’re right. ABsolutely.We’ve seen the light. You don;t need to tell us any more. I think you should go work on the folks at the Kos for a while now, we’re convinced, bye-bye, don;t let the door hit you in the arse on your way out.
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
9
0
Seen the light? How about we get crowley to “walk toward the light”?
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
11
0
Just light him. Less difficult.
Like or Dislike:
5
0
Specifically a pair of lights in the number one lane of a freeway.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
Or the light at the end of the tunnel, the train tunnel.
Rated Awesome! What do you think?
8
0
Yeah, we “seen the light” and voted for Romney, you essentially voted for four more years.
Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike?
1
11
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Like or Dislike:
6
0
OhhhhhhKaaaaay, let me type this REAL SLOW so that even a retard like you can read it.
Ron Paul NEVER STOOD A FUCKING SNOWBALLS CHANCE IN HELL OF GETTING THE NOMINATION.
The only person who “cheated” Ron Paul was RON PAUL!
There is simply NO FUCKING WAY that some moron who thinks it is okay to give a bunch of 7th century ragheads ATOMIC WEAPONS is going to get nominated to anything more than a wrap around sports coat.
As I said before, Dr. Paul has some great domestic ideas, however his foreign policy is about as intelligent as the average I.Q. of a turnip.
Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike?
2
9
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Like or Dislike:
5
0
I think he is getting aroused again…He’s got Ron paul on his mind.
Like or Dislike:
5
0
I recall WMDs, nukes not so much. What did I miss?
Like or Dislike:
4
0
nothin’
Like or Dislike:
4
0
He’s hallucinating. Must have had an OD of Kool Aid.
Like or Dislike:
5
0
Here twerp, live and learn
http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2012/12/07/surprise-wmds-from-iraq-were-moved-to-syria-by-saddam-hussein/
Of course in your world he never had WMDs either, that was fairy dust he gassed his own people with.
I voted for Ron Paul too! For him to sit down and shut up.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
so good to have verifiable info re: WMD. Seems this validates former POTUS Bush’s actions.
as for me, I considered so damn insane to be viably recognizable as a WMD.
Like or Dislike:
4
0
He obviously had his one lucid post of the year yesterday. Will probably be at least another year before we get another one.
Like or Dislike:
5
0
ooddballz, why are you talking to a brick wall?
Like or Dislike:
5
0
Because a brick wall is smarter than Crowley.
Like or Dislike:
4
0
What poppa said.
Like or Dislike:
6
0
Those pesky numbers have away of being proven correct. Looks like Jack did know his shit. Welch called the number bogus and those that put them out liars. Vindication is all that can be said.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
“maybe the unemployment rate reported before the election was a dastardly lie to ensure a certain ineffective president’s re-election.”
Or maybe, the rate actually HAS skyrocketed since the election?
Like or Dislike:
2
0
why not both?
Like or Dislike:
3
0
What unemployment Robert?
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/unemployment-plunges-38-government-workers-government-adds-35000-jobs-november-544000
“In October, federal, state and local governments in the United States employed 20,524,000 people. In November, that climbed to 20,559,000.”
Like or Dislike:
2
0
that’s not only outrageous, it’s absurd!
Like or Dislike:
4
0
Why yes. Yes it is.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
indeed
Like or Dislike:
2
0
They needed new people to process the unemployment checks.
You must log in to post a comment.
{ 1 trackback }