Chris Christie: NRA Ad Referencing Obama’s Daughters ‘Reprehensible’. This, from a guy who hasn’t seen his ‘gun’ in decades.
26 Comments on "Chris Christie: NRA Ad Referencing Obama’s Daughters ‘Reprehensible’"
You must be logged in to post a comment.
How soon they forget
Gov Chrispy of NJ, Should be concerned with living until 2016, perhaps he wants to be the first 400 pounder to “run/waddle” for national office.
I have lost all respect for this clown. He is merely looking at his political future, which is dim as a Republican in New Jersey, even if he is at best, a RINO. I am looking at a conversion to Democommie soon, more running his mouth as a pro-socialist. Anything to stay in politics and keep the money pouring in. Like Fenster said, he’ll be on his knees in front of some union bosses soon and he wont only be begging forgiveness.
He got his pockets lined from Sandy,he’s a closet democrat.He’s the perfect loud mouth style union boss.
How do you get Chris Christie to turn a trick? Offer then withhold FEMA money.
I hear he’ll roll over for a Milk Bone.
You do NOT want to know what he’ll do for a Klondike Bar!
OH CRAP, I just clicked a HUFFPO link, now I feel in need of a shower.
The New Jersey doughboy is just another whining liberal RINO. Without a doubt his children are also in a private school with security. As for der leaders daughters, der leader brought the children into this debate. It’s only fair that the public be informed of how der leader and the wookie ensure the safety and well being of their daughters while denying the average American parent the same opportunity.
If you’re getting flak, you’re probably over the target. The Libs are screaming foul because this was EXACTLY the right argument to make. We didn’t make this ‘about the children’, HE did. The fact that Sidwell Friends School has eleven armed guards begs the question. I understand that the kids that go there are high value targets for scumbags and terrorists, but I think what we learned from Sandy Hook is that ALL of our children are high value targets.
Also, the left is NOT as stupid as they are sounding about this. No one could possibly interpret the ad as saying that the NRA wants the Obama children to be unprotected. But the left sees that this is the only possible way to prevent some collateral damage. I’m surprised they didn’t scream “racism” over this… that the NRA wants the first kids to be sitting ducks because they are black, and the NRA hates black people. They are probably saving that tactic for when they need the big guns.
I for one will not forget that n0bama hug by Christy. He lost my vote that day for sure – and nothing he can do now will regain it. Sleep with the dogs – suffer the fleas.
Christie will be running against Hillary for the Democratic Presidential nomination in 2016. Expect a pro-union conversion sometime in the next 4 years.
Christie is nothing more then a whiny RINO with a bigger mouth then his gut. I don’t know what kind of deal he made with “Dear Leader”, after that so called super storm, but I bet he got his in the bargain.
He made lots of fans for telling entitled union types, like teachers, to stuff it. But there were a few guys in the conservative media, like Jim Quinn, who said he’s really not much a conservative. Guns are a prime issue, & you are seeing that here. Fact is, he is a northeastern Republican, or in others words, a RINO. He’s part of a faction of GOPers who likes the social circles of The Beltway & Manhattan/MSM way too much.
Don’t worry, he’ll still get the Republican presidential nomination in a few years.
On a side note, I thought it was a decent ad. Just points out the truth. I want his kids to be protected as all our nations children should be.
I do think the answer to school violence is with smaller schools. Not only would they be less of a target, but the kids may actually learn something. One school not far from me, the the kids form clicks… blacks, whites, hispanics and they all hate each other. Smaller schools would allow more integration of all students. There are probably countless other benefits, but I don’t have kids so I’m not going to go into them.
Joe:”Don’t worry, he’ll still get the Republican presidential nomination in a few years.”
I don’t know, Joe. He’s starting to get the reputation of wanting to please the liberal intelligentsia too much. I think his hug of Obama a week before the election has irreparably damaged him with conservatives and maybe even moderates and independents. I saw him yucking it up on “Morning Joe” a while back. On a late night TV show he went on and on about his love of Bruce Springsteen shortly after Springsteen was helping register same day votes for Obama in Ohio appearances with him.
“Christie Positions Himself to Challenge Hillary in the 2016 Democrat Primary”
Ya… But… It’s the republican party. They’ll double down on being idiots and he probably seems like a good bet to them.
He’s spineless, the RNC is spineless, most Republican voters are spineless. It sounds like a good match to me.
He should just admit it and change that “R” to a “D”. He’s not even a RINO, he’s a mouthy Democrat.
Then there’s Rubio and his amnesty plan. I’m beginning to not like him either.
I’ve never been a Rubio fan but I admit I missed his illegal immigration position. I assume he wants a “pathway to citizenship” and some sort of DREAM Act.
Actually, he proposed a DREAM Act a while ago, now he is proposing a pathway. Don’t care, not interested in amnesty, pathway, or DREAM, it’s all a nightmare. I will admit I was swayed by the hype on Rubio, but the bloom is off the rose.
He’s already running for president.
Following in Obama’s footsteps? Barely in office, zero experience, and running for President. I guess having no record to run on is the new formula for winning?