Pedophilia on parade: Pray for a giant earthquake to strike San Francisco on August 17, 2013

by editor on August 21, 2011

We’ve heard of nutty psychiatrists, but this one takes the proverbial cake.

pedophile-playground

Do you ever think to yourself that this is a very sick world?

If a small group of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals have their way at a conference this week, pedophiles themselves could play a role in removing pedophilia from the American Psychiatric Association’s bible of mental illnesses — the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), set to undergo a significant revision by 2013. Critics warn that their success could lead to the decriminalization of pedophilia. 

Yes, you read right! This group wants to normalize pedophilia and keep pedophiles out of prison. Sounds like NAMBLA on steroids. Or perhaps LSD.

The August 17 Baltimore conference is sponsored by B4U-ACT, a group of pro-pedophile mental health professionals and sympathetic activists. According to the conference brochure, the event will examine “ways in which minor-attracted persons [pedophiles] can be involved in the DSM 5 revision process” and how the popular perceptions of pedophiles can be reframed to encourage tolerance.

Child advocate Dr. Judith Reisman, a visiting professor at Liberty University’s School of Law, said the conference is part of a strategy to condition people into accepting pedophiles.

There’s already a great way to get them out of prison. Quit putting them in special housing units and put them in with the general prison population. Removal is fast, permanent and provided for free by the inmates.

While they’re at it maybe they should put the psychiatrists in with them.

– Written by CO2Insanity

Source: The Daily Caller

Leave a Reply

131 Comments on "Pedophilia on parade: Pray for a giant earthquake to strike San Francisco on August 17, 2013"

Notify of
whiskeyriver
Guest

I have three grandchildren, two of them girls. I am a redneck, hillbilly, whatever label you want to use. My family belives in taking care of our own and the vast majority of us own guns. Anybody, I don’t care who, messes with one of ours we go hunting.

We believe in letting the law handle problems if they do it right. But, if anyone ever harms one of my grandchildren the law will be the least of their problems, it will be their salvation. Any of you vets here ever worked with a .308 Winchester? If the law doesn’t take care of whoever harms one of mine in a very short time, quickly and efficiently, I will. Prison means nothing to me in this case, I have been in worse places. And if something happens to me and I cannot take care of the problem, all it would take is a phone call. There are a lot of brothers, nephews, cousins, even third removed cousins, that would have no problem helping out. Like I said, we are a big family and we will take care of our own.

VelvetKevorkian
Member

So this is the next step in the progressive playbook? Acceptance of child molesters as being “minor attracted”. That is the most fucked up thing I have heard in a long time.

The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.

Progressive Hemrrhoid
Member
Progressive Hemrrhoid

So that’s where all the NAMBLA members went. How much do you want to bet most of them are part of the “Alternative Lifestyle” as well.

YT
Member

They rally round the family
With a pocket full of rubbers

They rally round the family
With a pocket full of rubbers

They rally round the family
With a pocket full of rubbers

They rally round the family
With a pocket full of rubbers

Pedophiles on parade!

MDLION
Member

In the early 2000s I read that they were going to attempt to mainstream pedophilia. They dropped it or delayed it for a few years when the priest abuse scandal broke out. They saw the general outrage there among people and wanted the Catholic Church to be hammered. Now that that scandal has died down some, here they come again. I don’t think they’re going to find the success with mainstreaming this that they did with abortion and to a lesser degree, so-called gay marriage.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

We just have to hammer them every time they bring it up. I don’t CARE who a person marries. That is completely consentual, and between adults. We can not allow anyone to hurt children and get away with it. Engage in whatever kind of sex you want to, but leave the kids the hell out of it!

David Bishop
Member

As much as I don’t believe pets have inane rights, I don’t think bestiality should be legalized either. So maybe, leave the kids and goats the hell out of it?

RockingHorseGuy
Member

OLIVIA!! DB’s talking bad about your beloved Muslims again!! Get over here and defend them!!

David Bishop
Member

True story. You have no idea how many times I saw Iraqis f***king goats in 2 and a half years.

drb
Member

EEEEEEWWWWW!
You coulda kept that story to yourself.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

Actually, the truth about these “people” should be brought to light every chance we get.

drb
Member

Let PETA deal with them then

Babydoll102187
Member

I reserve my right to remain INTOLERANT of pedophiles.

YT
Member

You have no rights under ape law!

David Bishop
Member

I don’t know if this is a racist stab at Obama. So I will assume it’s not and laugh my ass off. The last movie I saw was planet of the apes and I just imagined, with our continuing decline, that apes would take over the world.

Your statement therefore made me ROFL.

KimmyQueen
Guest

“…and how the popular perceptions of pedophiles can be reframed to encourage tolerance.”

EXCUSE ME?!

“…the conference is part of a strategy to condition people into accepting pedophiles.”

Did I read that right?!

This better not be for real, because if it is, and it so happens that pedophilia is “tolerated”, is just telling me that this country is going to see its end really soon. Nothing will “condition” me to “tolerate” pedophiles. There is nothing normal nor tolerable about an adult being sexually “attracted” to a child. It is disgusting and immoral for an adult to have sex with a child. Children are not mature nor sophisticated enough to decide without any type of manipulation that they should be having sex, especially with an adult.

This is appalling and these people and “doctors” should be ashamed of themselves.

deepthinker
Member

Accepting a pedophile, when hell freezes over. A pedophile is the lowest form of living “human being”. Any person who harms a child does not deserve to be “accepted”. They deserve to be scorned and cast aside.

Any doctor advocating this need to have their license to practice medicine revoked immediately. A pedophile can not be cured. There are too many attempts and studies to back this up.

David Bishop
Member

They deserve to be tried, convicted, and castrated. If it happens again, killed.

drb
Member

What do you mean, IF it happens again??

They will do it again. They cannot be cured. There is something very wrong going on in their heads. They shouldn’t get a second chance. They cannot be allowed anywhere near a child, period.

David Bishop
Member

Then just kill them. Pedophiles and rapists are the lowest of the low in my book.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

I feel what you’re saying, DB. And I know that anyone who harmed your children would be taking their life in their hands. And I wouldn’t convict you if I were on the jury. But it goes back to the same situation. Once the useless f*%k has harmed your child, knowing he’l be up for the death penalty if he’s caught, he’s not going to leave a witness. There has to be a progression to the penalty.

David Bishop
Member

I concur. There needs to be some line. But that bar is definitely much higher then it is set now.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

I do agree with you, DB. People are getting off much too lightly. Maybe if they cleared out the jails of all the guys that are in there for smoking a joint, there would be more room for criminals.

I’ve never even considered smoking ANYTHING, I can’t even stand the smell of the stuff, but what do I care if somebody else does it? Sorry, the Libertarian in me shows sometimes.

KimmyQueen
Guest

The only true problem I have with it, is when people choose to smoke it (which many times lead to ingesting something else) and they get behind a vehicle or attempt to do an activity that could put others in danger. I remember Nicole Richie driving on the wrong way of a highway, it is a miracle that the highway was pretty much empty if she had done that when there were several vehicles she could have killed someone. She smoked marijuana and she also had a pain medication in her.

All I am saying is that I may not care what people do, but if it puts innocent people in danger it bothers me greatly.

David Bishop
Member

There is so much research out there on marijuana and other activities such as driving it’s hilarious. I recommend “The Drug War.” It destroys that argument. Nicole Richie is not the rule.

KimmyQueen
Guest

I don’t need nor want your recommendations.

David Bishop
Member

Well, whether you need or want my recommendation, the research is there.

It is been proven 10 times over that the penalties on drug use only encourage them, enrich drug dealers, and spread our police force thin. There hasn’t been a reasonable argument for our “war on drugs” in the last 50 years. I apologize if I offended you, but the facts are there.

KimmyQueen
Guest

The point being that I would rather not have you selectively trying to “teach” me something. I don’t need nor want your recommendations, if you are not going to respect my own.

For those that want to smoke it, they can find whatever research that suits them. I will stick with the human research: family and friends of those that have died innocently due to a murdering pot smoking useless individual who thought that pot is a harmless drug. I can also take valuable time to find research that refutes yours, but I for one refuse to waste my time, like I said it is valuable. You can keep your research, I will have to keep my memories of a grieving Mother who lost her baby to remind me that pot is not a “harmless” drug.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

Kimmy, I don’t go and find research to suit my needs because I want to smoke anything. I don’t even smoke cigarettes. I rarely even drink, and have only been drunk twice, 30 years ago. Your arguments against marijuana have some merit, but if you want to be fair, you’d have to make alcohol illegal too. I believe you know how well that worked out.

KimmyQueen
Guest

I don’t care about the first post, but seriously? You (the people who thumb down) would vote down the fact that there are children and innocent people that do die because of the irresponsibility of those that use this drug?

Anyone taking mind/mood/emotional numbing, mind/mood/emotional altering drugs, knowing fully well that it does not bring the best out of them and they choose to not do anything to prevent themselves from getting in a car, driving and murder innocent people…. is a disgusting individual.

I am disgusted by the votes down… disgusted.

drb
Member

KQ, you know I love you, but I think you are misinterpreting David’s intent on this one.

KimmyQueen
Guest

So make alcohol illegal what do I care? What’s your point?

RockingHorseGuy
Member

The point is that it has been tried, and didn’t work. Actually, it worked about as well as outlawing weed. By the way, just so you know, I didn’t thumb you down. I’m all for the death penalty for people who drive under the influence of ANY intoxicants.
I grew up in a household with an alcoholic as it’s “leader,” and saw what it does to the people around it. My mother was still a beautiful woman when she died at the age of 45, due to the alcoholism of the “man” she married. So alcohol does not impress me in the least.
But go ahead, try once again to outlaw alcohol. Maybe I’ll come out of retirement and work like a mad dog for another decade, building all the new prisons.

Burnerjack
Member

I have often thought that some if not many people in the psychiatric field were drawn there because of a curiosity about why they themselves seemed “different”.
Well, this kinda feeds into that notion.
Many here seem to lump homosexuality in with peodophilia as far as mental ilness is concerned. While sexual attraction is primarily for reproduction, it is also for bonding. I make no case for it other than to say it is typicaly between adults and therefore none of my business who is attracted to whom. Disease? Maybe, as it is assumed to be 10% of the population(?). Definition of a disease?
Peodiphilia is the sexual predation of a minor for the sexual and psychological satisfaction of the predator, devoid of empathy for the victim.
As it is “normal” for a strange adult to come to the aid of a child in danger, whether drowning, lost or other, this protective reaction is instinctive and serves the need of the group or community at large.
Peodaphilia is about a victim and perpetrator. Homosexuality is about the attraction between two adults who are of the same sexual persuasion. Vastly different I think. One has victims, the other does not. And no, I’m not gay, just someone that can tell the difference.

KimmyQueen
Guest

I agree somewhat, however, the fact is that there are pedophiles that do not mind having sex with adult men either, or else they want to have sex with men, but they prefer them to be ‘young’. A lot of heterosexual pedophiles keep telling themselves that the girls they rape are actually women, they are just young in number, but they are mature enough to choose to be with them (like an adult women would). I don’t think that it is very different for an homosexual who would rather be with a teenager/or younger boy, just like an heterosexual who would rather be with a teenager/or younger girl… they are both pedophiles. Not all pedophiles are gay, but some pedophiles are gay.

Conservative Kentuckian
Guest
Conservative Kentuckian

I say geld every last one of these degenerates. And I like the idea of turning them out into the general prison population. That would sure solve the problem right there quick, fast and without any further stress on the already over taxed taxpayer.

David Bishop
Member

Pedophiles and child rapists should be castrated. It is a punishment that fits the crime, and prevents it from being commited again. I honestly advocate the death penalty for most rapists. If you chose to take someone’s God-granted rights from someone, yours should be taken from you as well. We need to stop shying away from the death penalty in this country.

RKae
Member

I’d like to back you on this, as I’m a huge DP fan, but there are things to consider:

I recall reading an excellent article in “American Spectator” way back in the days of print. They covered the application of the DP in China and Russia. One country applied it for murder and their murder rate went down. The other applied it for many other crimes (home invasion, rape) and the murder rate went up. What happens is someone breaks into your home or rapes you and then figures, “I may as well kill this person; I’m already eligible for the death penalty.”

The DP is a serious move. It needs great consideration and level heads. But, yes, it NEEDS to be available! I love the fact that we have it here in WA state. When we finally got the Green River Killer, he was faced with the DP and he caved, admitted, and showed where the bodies were. It saved the state the cost of an endless trial and it allowed the families to put their daughters to rest.

I like the DP because it’s either the end of the criminal’s life or an excellent bargaining device to put a stop to a lengthy trial.

YT
Member

DP = double penetration? Sick f*ck….

drb
Member

DP=death penalty

Babydoll102187
Member

I like it.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

I’ve always been in favor of the death penalty. But it’s true, DB. If the death penalty is allowed for crimes less than murder, the murder rate will increase. The rapist has no concern for the life of his victim. He only leaves her alive because the penalty for rape is much less than for murder. It’s sick, and it’s sad, but it’s true.

RKae
Member

Here’s something to ponder:

Get ready for the argument “It’s the illegality of it that creates the problem.” They’ll tell you that the reason kids get killed by pedophiles is because the pedophiles fear being caught. So they’re going to try the “Make it legal and the associated problems will just evaporate” argument.

When you finally hear this excuse, remember, “RKae predicted that!”

Sidekick
Member

With that rationale, we can argue that the illegality of murder, rape, extortion, etc leads to a high crime rate. Make them legal and crime problem solved. I do see your point and the drug law questions give it support but if we are so dysfunctional that we allow the rights of one to infringe on the rights of another to that extent, than we are done as a working society.

RKae
Member

Well, when you say “to that extent” then you’re labelling yourself as one of those “uptight Christian loons who thinks that sex is scary, icky and bad.”

That’s the argument that you’ll be hit with in the future. Get ready for it.

In a culture where sex permeates everything as the greatest damned thing you can possibly do with your day; where it’s the plot of every movie; the subject of every song; something you turn down only if you’re a “complete idiot,” and the topic of every conversation, how can you convince anyone that it’s an infringement on someone?

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again: In the society where sex is meaningless, rape is not a crime.

KimmyQueen
Guest

Basically society is working its way to a place where there will be no victims of individual’s behaviors. This of course means that the amount of victims will undoubtedly increase. The only way for a victim to get justice will be to victimize another person especially if because of circumstances they cannot enact revenge on the person that victimized them. This is chaotic at the least. Anyone who believes that having no morals and no benign laws is the way to go, is a person that wants to hurt as many people as possible, but is just afraid to have to pay for it. If there is going to be a behavior that causes someone to become a true victim, there has to be punishment involved.

KimmyQueen
Guest

If it becomes not illegal to molest a child, it should not be illegal for a person to kill the pedophile if he molest his child. However, we live in contrary world where the person that kills the pedophile is given life or the needle while the pedophile is hailed as a martyr. I cannot believe that they somehow felt that this is appropriate. What has changed in society that somehow made this people confident that this will even be possible? This is really disturbing.

Babydoll102187
Member

What has changed in society? I think we already know. And this is the result. No doubt this will be accepted as mainstream in another 40 yrs.

There is a “reality” show on A&E or something like that, which centers around mothers who are romantically involed with men who have been convicted of child abuse via pedophilia, and see them as not being a danger to their own children. I dont watch it, but I saw a preview for it one day and thought “WTF?! That was weird, who would watch that crap?” Well now I know. Its messed up.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

Can you say lib…er…al…ism? Sure you can.

KimmyQueen
Guest

Women like that deserve to have the children taken away from them.

Melitta
Guest

As a recipient of such attention, May You Rot in the Most Hellish Possible Way!!!!

Paden
Member

This is a situation to apply the rule of “3 S’s”
Shoot- shovel- shut up.

I see an adult harming a child I’ll stop it.

fool4Jesus
Guest

All of this is in the Bible. It is NOT going to get better. Seek Jesus now and you’ll understand why the pervs are what they are. Again, it is not going to get better.

beanhead54
Guest

f4J: “…it is not going to get better.”

I disagree entirely. I’m convinced that common sense will out in this case as well as many others. We are not lab rats, and I believe that the tipping point is near, where the masses of center-thinking Americans will go “feral” and insist that our self-appointed “handlers” knock-off the nonsense and stop herding us around in their wrongly chosen direction.

sifi
Member

Jesus called Satan the “father of all lies.” The Bible warns “in the last days” evil men (and women) will be prevalent. Lying and deception (which are now called “spin”, a way of presenting information, especially a way that makes something seem good or less bad) will characterize the generation (and the leaders) who will pull the world down into the dark abyss and terrors of the coming “Apocalypse” . . .

“But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come . . .

Evil men and impostors will grow worse and worse,

deceiving [speaking lies easily and convincingly] and being deceived.”

(2 Tim 3:1, 13)

The Bible goes on to warn all those who call the things God calls evil, “good,” and the things God calls good, “evil.” Although there are many examples of this twisting of right and wrong found in our world today, including lying and deceiving, other obvious examples include homosexuality, which God (and the Bible) calls evil (see ‘homosexuality’) which is now being presented as “good” (on television, in movies, and in our schools) . . . while simply posting the 10 Commandments in a public place, or individual, group, or national prayer, publicly spoken in the name Jesus Christ, which God (and the Bible) calls good, is now being ridiculed and attacked as “evil” . . .

“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;

who put darkness for light, and light for darkness;”

beanhead54
Guest

“We’ve heard of nutty psychiatrists, but this one takes the proverbial cake.”

I have a friend in the business of “tolerance” with whom I’ve had this argument on a variety of topics. From Defense of Marriage, to Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, to Open Borders, these people and their navel-gazing hypothetical beliefs do not live out here in the “real” world where their outrageous ideas grind the gears of everyday life to a halt. They reside in the cotton-batted halls of academia, or the controlled settings of hospitals and clinics, preaching their nonsense to each other and the choir.

With the monumental failures of our mental health community in regards to the welfare state, public education and the recidivism rate of our criminal class to date, what possible faith could the general population have that these “experts” haven’t “gone native” and that many of them are as nutty as the patients they’re supposedly treating?

Blindfolded Liberal
Guest

The only problem with prison is they get out. You’d vomit knowing the statistics. Obviously we can’t kill them. I volunteer constantly but they won’t let me. So I propose giving them their own island. Maybe key west. Lord knows a mess of em are already there. You guys can name it though cause I’m out of creativity for today.

LA Sunset
Member

Oh, now see here. Olivia is not going to like this post. Paedophiles are a protected class.

They were born perverted low-life sick bastards and cannot help themselves. Instead of wishing them dead, we should pass a law stating that counseling for this abhorrent behavior should be covered under Obamacare, Medicaid, and even Medicare. We should take stimulus money and set up specific programs for these poor snakes.

Sarcasm: OFF

Lori
Guest

Wow. Is this crackpot serious? Acceptance? Tell that to Jaycee Dugard and all the other kids who were tortured because of these kind of people. There is no need for acceptance. We do NOT need to tolerate these sick people. THEY need to know their place. Which should be in general pop. I have NO sympathy for these ppl at all; being a victim myself. WTF is goin on in this country?!

trackback
Jayhawk46
Member

This is exactly what we all warned about 40 years ago when we first started decrying the “slippery slope”. We have been steadily and systematically conditioned to accept that which nature itself abhors. Just like the frogs in the pot, we are swimming around in our own filth, oblivious to the increasing temperature.

Neo-7
Member

When I was younger Homosexuallity was considered a mental illness . I guess this was a few steps removed from God calling it an abomination. Now we that don’t see it , the way ” modern and civil people ” see it , we are now considered in the wrong. Most ( a very large % ) of the catholic church child molesting cases , that were the rage awhile back , involved homosexual priest and teenage boys.

With the age of consent in some countries being 12 , I believe mankind is not doing well. Where is the line in the sand drawn ? We teach our children , that its okay to slaughter our unwanted babies , in the name of choice , then turn around and try to teach them to respect one another. We teach our children that all manner of society wrong is good , then can’t understand when something more evil than the last generation is now being considered good.

Nothing has changed as the warning went out many years ago , ” Woe unto them that call evil good and good evil , that put darkness for light and light into darkness , that but bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter !

andre
Member

And proponents of – well, how to put this so as to be properly descriptive AND nice – perversion? moral degradation? (or am I being judgemental, heaven forbid), all mock anyone who mentions or implies the “slippery slope” argument.

BTW, the problems in the Catholic Church started just about the time they embraced psychology coming into their seminaries to ensure that the future priests were “qualified” to do their jobs. I guess someone should have asked what their definition of “their job” was.

The problem with drawing lines, and we draw lines everywhere, in all aspects of life, is that SOMEONE is left juuusst on the “wrong” side. And they very naturally want to be on the “right” side. So going down the slippery slope does not just “happen”, like the weather. Sentient, self determined human beings, specific people with names and goals, DECIDE to do something to serve their self-interest.

So despite all the assurances from the diversity-loving, rainbow types that NO ONE wants to legalize marriage between siblings, or polygamy, or with a stuffed animal, or a live one for that matter, trust me – you are mistaken. Those who want to marry their sibling, or multiple wives, or their pet WILL push for it. And over time, they will succeed.

Because no one seems to want to ever say no. Because most of us now suffer from another psychology-induced mental illness – the notion that having a specific, well-defined moral code is not only wrong, but somehow oppressive to others. Because those people are really not that different from someone who is accepted, and just barely on the wrong side of the line, so “well, why not? It won’t really hurt anyone. It’s not like we want to legalize sex with 9 year-olds. NO ONE wants that, right?”

Of course not, no one wants that. Well except for those who want to have sex with 9-year olds, you nitwit.

Bottom line – this should come as a surprise to no one. I know I’ve been saying this is coming, well, since about the time the Catholic Church let the psychs in.

RKae
Member

In the Catholic scandals 81% were homosexual pedophiles. Yup. 81%.

That’s a pretty huge percentage for a persuasion that amounts to less than 2% of the total population.

Warren
Guest

…Is this what our society is now? This is disgusting and morally repulsive.

Sidekick
Member

“ways in which minor-attracted persons [pedophiles] can be involved in the DSM 5 revision process” and how the popular perceptions of pedophiles can be reframed to encourage tolerance.”

These are truly sick pieces of excrement. Not that this movement will likely ever get anywhere but to advocate victimizing children…please let me meet one of these people. I am always looking for new sparring partners. Touch a child like this and you deserve the most severe punishment legally possible. Defend pedophilia Olivia, you’re a progressive, therefore non judgmental (of non-conservatives) and moral standards-free you should have a ready made excuse for this.

RKae
Member

Not that this movement will likely ever get anywhere but to advocate victimizing children…

Let’s not get comfortable in thinking “This can’t happen here.”

Pedophilia is not “beyond human comprehension.” If sexual activity keeps seeping into every American activity, then kids WILL INDEED be pulled into it at some point. It already goes on to a HUGE extent behind closed doors. It’s just a matter of the same old lines being used: “Everyone’s doing it anyway,” “Let’s not be hypocrites.”

When I was a kid, practically no one got divorced. There was ONE house on our street where the kids had a single mom. As the debate raged about “removing the stigma of divorce,” every single study showed that it was bad for children, and the ultimate decision from the so-called experts was “Yeah, but so what? Let’s make divorce quick ‘n’ easy. The kids will eventually learn to deal with it somehow.”

Sidekick
Member

So long as the laws stay on the books…..I see your point.

KimmyQueen
Guest

We are going down the same path of pretty much every superpower and empire. Rome comes to mind. By its end there was shrine or temple prostitution, its leaders were immoral and corrupt, divorce and adultery were rampart and accepted, overtaxation and the increase poverty of its citizens… People want to believe that we need to live in a judgement free society where people are allowed to do whatever they want, regardless of how others are affected, because it is good for us somehow. It isn’t. We need to realize that we do need boundaries. Robbing a child of his or her innocence, in my opinion, is perhaps the ultimate act of evil.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

But Rome had the excuse of lead in the wine. What’s the excuse for the lunatics of today?

BarbR
Member

Fluoride?

RockingHorseGuy
Member

Ok, I can see that.

KimmyQueen
Guest

It is a possibility.

RockingHorseGuy
Member
KimmyQueen
Guest

Oh my goodness!!! This cannot be true… this is not good. Who is the fool that allowed this? This is extreme. I understand that there is some question about it, but i never heard this before.

YT
Member

Don’t forget the greeks and their little boys! Plato’s Phaedrus dialog about how Socrates compared screwing boys to being a father.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

That still doesn’t explain what the hell is wrong with society now. We got the lead out, is there residual? Did all these idiots eat the paint off the staircase when they were kids? Could that explain Dear Sweet Olivia?

KimmyQueen
Guest

It is very hard for me to find a way to excuse the behavior of certain people. Society is just becoming worst every decade.

Melitta
Guest

Do not minimize the possibility of this becoming accepted. We mollycoddle murderers and rapists as it is and kill the unborn. How backwards we are already.

Sidekick
Member

“How backwards we are already.”

Or progressive….depends on the POV. Those opposed to this are the problem with these “people”.

drb
Member

I’m speechless! WTF??

Mary
Guest

So let me get this straight…this group wants it to not be a crime to molest children? You are kidding right? What has the world come to? People that molest children are sick and should NEVER be allowed around children again, EVER!

Ruben
Member

Who couldn’t see this coming? This is the same outfit that did the same thing with homosexuality in the 1960s. Up next: pedophilia, followed by bestiality.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

Then, homonecrobeastopedophiliacs. It’s true, I saw them on Jerry Springer.

poppajoe49
Member

Back when I applied to be a Big Brother, I went through all the screening and mental testing. When I was approved, I went in for a final interview where the lady asked me what kind of Little Brother I wanted. I asked her what she meant and she said “we have all kinds of kids, most are just from divorced homes, but some have emotional problems, and some are abused.” I said, “you don’t want to do that”, she asked what I meant and I told her “If I see anyone abusing a child, I’ll fucking kill them. I probably just blew this interview, but that’s how I feel.” She looked at me and said “I have seen that look in many mens eyes, but you are the first one to say it. You didn’t blow the interview, you just confirmed that we made a good choice.”
Abusing children and women has always been a sore subject with me, I hate it and have had the opportunity to put a stop to it more than once in my life. I never saw a child abused, but have seen “men” abusing women, and I stopped it. There is nothing lower on earth than someone that abuses a child or woman, and as long as I can draw a breath, I will do something about it when I see it.

KimmyQueen
Guest

I admire that you stand by those principles. Overall we need more real men in our world.

drb
Member

Thank you, Poppa.

KimmyQueen
Guest

The fool that gave me a thumbs down… you are a fool but whatever, but giving it to Poppa? What the heck is wrong with you? Are you a freak?

poppajoe49
Member

Kimmy, it’s probably just one of those pedophiles Olivia would be defending if she were here. After all, we all know pedophiles are just misunderstood people that love children, just ask any NAMBLA member! 😉

RockingHorseGuy
Member

Either a pedophile, or a Muslim “man,” assuming anyone can see the difference.

poppajoe49
Member

Not all pedophiles have AK-47’s.

Ruben
Member

You’ve been targeted ever since the first time you owned Olivia.

KQ… where are you these days?

wpDiscuz