Weinstein_Clinton.jpg
Why the Harvey Weinstein story is worse than you think. It’s not just that this crapweasel is the personal friend and financier for most of the big names of the Democrat Party. The NYSlimes, believe it or not, had this story in 2004 but spiked it out of pure cowardice because Miramax was a big advertiser and because Matt Damon and Russell Crowe personally called to ask the newspaper not to print it. (Remember that the next time Matt Damon is waxing self-righteous about some leftwing issue.) Plus Weinstein owns Manhattan’s district attorney and God knows how many other DAs. Plus the behavior of which he is accused is so common in Hollywood it’s considered normal. We will probably never know how many big-name actresses got their start by getting naked and humiliating themselves for producers like Harvey Weinstein. Here’s a guess: most of them.

Leave a Reply

13 Comments on "Why the Harvey Weinstein story is worse than you think"

Notify of
danybhoy
Member

Outside of Soros, Weinstein was probably the most powerful behind the scenes guy on the left. At least in the USA. He was correct on the right issues & bankrolled them as the left sees them.

The problem is, way too many on the left knew what kind of dirtbag he is, knew what he was doing, who he was doing it to, & it didn’t matter. Which brings me to Ashley Judd. You know, the “nasty woman” who did a lovely piece of performance art taking dead aim at Donald Trump being this, that, & the other in terms of being a piece of crap. But said nothing about someone who actually did something to her…

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4962354/Ashley-Judd-breaks-silence-Weinstein.html

…it’s too bad she is so hyper-political in the worst way possible, because I could have a bit of sympathy for her with Weinstein. Instead, she projected that to someone else who had nothing to do with anything, knowing it would be seen/heard by everyone everywhere. That makes me question her motives as much as those who accepted Weinstein’s money knowing what they knew. Either way, they have all told me what matters to them, & want nothing to do with any of them.

JPTravis
Member

Meanwhile, Donna Karan decided to defend Weinstein, saying women bring it on themselves by how they dress:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4964380/Donna-Karan-defends-Harvey-Weinstein-blames-victims.html

She will shortly be sliced into pieces and eaten by liberal feminists.

Watching the liberal celebrity-sphere turn on and devour itself is WAY better entertainment than watching the NFL. This is fun!

poppajoe49
Member
JPTravis
Member

Cowardly mealy-mouthed liberals: Saturday Night Live’s writers apparently had Weinstein jokes ready to go Saturday but producer Lorne Michaels spiked them:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2017/10/09/watch-snls-cold-open-after-the-vegas-massacre-was-actually-pretty-perfect-n2392596

Michaels’s excuse for not doing Weinstein jokes was, “It’s a New York thing.” But wait a minute: where are Bill O’Reilly and Donald Trump from? Timbuktu?

MGAP
Member

Sounds like we’ve located the source of anger for so many famous liberal women. I wonder how many of them are closet conservatives; afraid to stand up for how they really believe out of fear of losing fame and relevance.

Not so silent
Member
poppajoe49
Member

comment image

Not so silent
Member

“Would you like to be in a movie??” 🙂

poppajoe49
Member

That would be the perfect caption for that picture!

JPTravis
Member

Jabba the Hut! I knew Weinstein reminded me of someone!

sifi
Member

That picture has to be a reference to two peas in a pod

poppajoe49
Member

You mean 2 pigs in a poke?

Extirpates
Member

The fact that any of this got out was amazing, but we have only seen the very tip of the iceberg. the 90% we haven’t seen is more much more disgusting!

wpDiscuz