CNN’s Philip Mudd Blows Up at Paris Dennard for Telling Truth About ‘Profitable’ Security Clearances. No security clearance = no payoffs from the MSM for leaks and/or cushy jobs.
This post was last modified on August 20, 2018
CNN’s Philip Mudd Blows Up at Paris Dennard for Telling Truth About ‘Profitable’ Security Clearances. No security clearance = no payoffs from the MSM for leaks and/or cushy jobs.
This post was last modified on August 20, 2018
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (7)
Paris is right, there should (or does) exist a process to grant temporary clearance for an advisor, but for former employees to retain security clearances is madness.
It's called a provisional clearance and they have been around for years. No former government employee needs a security clearance, they no longer have the need to know shit.
The libtards are unaware so they suck this shit up.
What I wanted to see:
1) Paris laugh at Mudd and ask him when the last time that tactic worked on someone, third grade?
2) Asked the CNN host where he found Mudd because Paris thought he had been invited to participate in an adult conversation.
Mockery would have caused Mudd's head to come clean off.
And the host too. He was close to blowing his wig because Dennard would not let him bait him, Paris stuck to the point.
I don't watch the Commie News Network so I am not familiar with Paris Dennard but I like what he says. When I watched the clip I loved how he listened to Mudd spew his crap, never batted an eye, never lost his cool, and stayed on his topic even though it was pissing off the two white guys.
As always, emotion to the left - facts to the right.