Cynthia Dill: ‘Intersectionality’ defines Women’s March on Washington. I Hate the Media defines Intersectionality: When you’re a well to do white person that feels the need to appropriate some disadvantage points from a community that has historically faced greater marginalization.
This post was last modified on July 15, 2021
View Comments (9)
Couldn't "intersectionality" also be called gender or ethnic misappropriation by the left? Do white women REALLY have the right to join in this "protest?"
Wasn't all those speeches made at the intersection of K & Y Ave.
So...White guilt is alive and well.
The dnc is trying to get a grass roots movement going; similar to the Tea Party. I expect to see them resurrect hilarry to lead the fray. Hillary 2.0, will lead symbolic marches, most likely beginning in Selma, in an attempt to keep the fire burning until 2020. This, like the occoopoop Wall Street movement is destined to fail. They can prop up a boogey man for their followers to hate, but that doesn't negate the fact that the last 3 election cycles were a rejection, by the American voter, of democrat policy and left wing ideology. The one and only reason bho was able to win on 2008 was because he presented a vague notion of change and hope, not more left wing BS. Once those that were duped into voting for him realized their mistake, they knew they couldn't vote for his ideological twin, even if she had a vagina.
I expect to see them try to equate the "struggle" or whatever name they choose, to the civil rights marches of the 60s. Problem here is there are no victims this time. In the 60s, our black citizens were victims. This go around, there are no victims in the picture. Only people with victim mentality. Victim mentality is so self destructive they will implode upon themselves. Also worth noting is that during the civil rights marches, the democrats were the boogey man, complete with pointy white hats and bedsheets. That they always try to appear like the ones who saved the black man from the evil republicans in the sixties, makes me believe they will once again pick up this tired ruse from their trite playbook. I don't see them succeeding, but I bet they try anyhow.
If Hillary is going to lead a march, it best be kept under a half a block, and she'll need helpers to get that far.
This will be astro turf indeed just like Nancy Pelosi accused Tea Party of being.
Psychobabble, keeping their followers stupid and confused since the 1960s.
I thought that was were two streets came together? Like Goa-Way lane and Pavement Narrows way...
At least she defined 'intersectionality'; it's an "analytic sensibility". All clear now?
PS: Would someone please alert me when a Progressive...any Progressive...says anything that actually relates to the real world? Thanks...