Ellen Degeneres Speaks Out Against Mississippi’s Gaystapo Law

Ellen Degeneres Speaks Out Against Mississippi’s Anti Gaystapo Law: Sorry Ellen but freedom of religion, association, expression, privacy and contract are rights. You do not have the right to force somebody to be your servant, affirm your political statements or participate in your religiously inspired ceremonies.

This post was last modified on April 7, 2016

Kip Hooker:

View Comments (12)

  • Ellen, like most of the gaystapo crowd, does not get the point. These religious freedom laws many states are enacting, or trying to enact, came about because of the radicals among the gay population.

    A family loses their business, forced to close and sell out, because they would not provide pizzas for a gay wedding. The gay couple couldn't find another pizza joint to deliver pies to their get together? An Oregon family has been sued into bankruptcy, forced to close their business, because they would not bake a wedding cake for a gay couple? That is supposed to be justice for the gay pair? Who did bake their cake and why didn't they go to that bakery to begin with? They had to shop around to find the only bakery in the area that would not bake their cake then sue them out of existence to justify their own existence?

    Gays are turning more and more people against them by condoning the actions of the radical few among them. People are tired of a very small part of our population shoving their lifestyle and beliefs down our throats, ruining some families lives in the process.

    • Exactly and like the rich gay pair in England suing for the Church of England to marry them, if you read what they have to say... in truth this is all about control. This isn't really about acceptance anymore. This is about controlling other people.

  • Don't worry Ellen, they're still serving 'tuna fish' at your favorite restaurant, down at the Y. Try to eat with you mouth closed, for a change, eh?

  • Most of the people are fed up with the Gaystapo and the Gaymafia forcing their radical agenda down our throats. What you do in the privacy of your home between consenting adults is NO ONES business. Yet if you wish to force it as normal, you are now seeing the end results. We Christians are tired of having our faith, views and values attacked by those who are of the mind set "Eat, drink and be merry" crowd. The leftist are all about the rights of the fringe groups and those who wish to kill us all. Yet they are the first ones to jump up and pound on the table when someone calls them out for their behavior or have a different position than theirs.

    As for DeGeneres, she is not funny. She has never been funny and the only damn reason she is on the air today is because she is gay. If she weren't gay, her no talent ass would be a cashier somewhere.

    • We were told that their lifestyles wouldn't affect anyone else's and that they were into the privacy of their behavior... obviously they lied. They WANT everyone to be involved in their lifestyles no matter if people disagree or just don't care to be involved. I don't understand why they feel that their behavior needs to be approved by everyone. It is a very tyrannical viewpoint.

      • It's bureaucrat-encouraged/engineered. My guess is that most in the LGBT "community" would prefer not to impose their lifestyle onto those who disagree but their issue amounts to a useful tool that our oh-so-benevolent elected overlords are using to deliberately deconstruct our culture.

        This is not about any sort of equality and it isn't a product of any sincere empathy with the non straight population. It is calculated to offend as much as possible those who hold traditional values. Otherwise the curious silence with regard to deplorable treatment of gays (not to mention women) by Muslims makes no sense.

        It's cold and calculated... meant to provoke the types of reactions that place in jeopardy members of the very groups advocated- by instigating politically useful reactions from those whose values are under siege.

        It's pure unmitigated evil.

  • Exactly.

    Are we free? If we are then we all need to be free not some of us.

    I don't want to serve nor do business with nor live around nor associate myself with a HECK of a lot of people. One of them is adulterers. I don't want to bake a cake nor prepare flower arrangements nor take photos of an adulterer's new wedding with a ho. I should have the right to deny him or her service.

    Am I judging? Yes. Am I perfect? No... but so what? I should be free to do that as it is my right to do so. The adulterer doesn't have the right to my service, my products, my good estimation, my presence nor my approval.

    • I remember seeing signs in the window of stores and restaurants that said "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone". We need to start that trend again.