Judge unseals Trump University docs, accidentally unleashes Clinton bombshell

Judge unseals Trump University docs, accidentally unleashes Clinton bombshell. Trump must be laughing his ass off about now.

It seems that Robbins Geller “paid the Clintons nearly half a million dollars in less than a year.” Why? Speeches of course.

That’s right. One of the law firms picked by the Judge in the Trump University case — the very Judge Donald Trump accuses by name of anti-Trump bias — awarded this firm the case after — say again after — Hillary and Bill Clinton had been paid a cool $450,000 for two speeches by the firm.

This post was last modified on November 11, 2021

CO2Insanity: Tired of the CO2 BS and all the other BS in the US and the world.

View Comments (9)

  • Meanwhile, some interesting news coming out about Bubba Gump Clinton ALSO being heavily involved in a for-PROFIT !!!! (GASP!) "university" chain.

  • OH BOY!!

    Trump called the judge correctly, mexican. La raza is a racist organization that should have their leaders jailed.

    You know everyone keeps thinking Trump does not know what he is doing and he keeps kicking ass. The judge will recuse himself within a month.

  • Any person that is a member of La Raza should have never been confirmed for the federal bench. La Raza like all other illegal immigrant groups runs counterintuitive to the US Constitution.

  • I don't see how this is a bombshell. The judge's rulings have not been slanted or unexpected, nor have they shown any bias. And that a law firm suing Trump might have a bias against Trump is... well, isn't that what you want if you're the client?

    Here, this link analyzes the judge's rulings so far:

    https://popehat.com/2016/06/01/lawsplainer-is-there-anything-unusual-about-judge-curiels-orders-in-the-trump-university-case/

    As you can see, one of the rulings Trump is bellyaching about hasn't even been made yet.

    • That's it, stick up for the La Raza Communist, as long as he's anti-T. PS - Are you familiar with the concept of a judge recusing himself from a case because he is inherently biased or has a personal interest in the outcome of a case?