Is National Geographic participating in child abuse? There is a photograph of a 9-year-old boy who thinks he wants to be a girl, and dresses like a girl, whose parents are allowing him to “transition” into being a girl, on the cover of the January 2017 issue. If LEOs found that same photo on your computer…
This post was last modified on December 18, 2016
View Comments (13)
LOL, not even going there!! I mean, I dunno what it says if your kid is on the cover of National Geographic.
With the leftists throwing shit against the wall, I found this story and it is more believable than anything Nat Geo shovels out.
http://www.worldnewsbureau.com/2016/12/nat-geo-features-boy-who-believes-hes-a-girl.html
Blaire White is right: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gtx7OVYby0 Personally I think this kid's life is ruined.
Yes the photo and the story is alarming. Something is wrong with everyone involved, starting with the activist Mother. Watch the video.
The background of the kid's mom tells us a lot about this situation.
Exactly. Disturbing that this is essentially being legally allowed due to political correctness.
Another leftist dip shit agenda coming true. There's no way a 9 year old knows anything about gender bending except through the schools and worthless parents
What the hell, did NAMBLA change their name to National Geographic?
Child abuse if I ever saw it. HE needs to be deprogrammed and HIS parents thrown in jail.
What conceivable connection is there between geography and sex? Politics, apparently.
Why, exactly, can't Nat Geo be busted for this?
Oh, yea. I forgot, they're left wing enablers.
"Why, exactly, can’t Nat Geo be busted for this?"
I don't get it either. And let's be real, just talking about the sexuality of a specific 9-year-old is creepy. If you ran across a person talking about your 9-year-old son's sexuality in a public playground, you'd deck him. And then stomp on him. And then call the police. And then stomp on him again while waiting for the police to arrive. But it's okay for a "journalist"? The left has gone so far off the deep end into depravity, they don't even see the creep in the mirror anymore.
$10 the journalist is a pedophile.
If you are interested in the sexuality of 9-year-olds and take photographs of 9-year-olds trying to accentuate their sexuality, you are by definition a pedophile. So I'm not taking that bet.