J.P. Travis: Born and raised in Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1976 graduate of University of Michigan, father, grandfather, husband, founder and CEO of Travelyn Publishing (http://www.travelynpublishing.com/), and passionate anti-government believer in individual liberty.
View Comments (15)
Well at least Brucelyn Jenner can get a job now that it's TV shopped flopped like a dead fish on a hot beach.
I just saw an item today that Brucelyn is saying how it's getting much more flak for being a Conservative than for being a tranny!
More liberal tolerance on display!
Hey, back of Brucelyn's case, she's one of us...
No…wait...
Yep.
Does this mean the CIA is investigating Barky, and needs undercover agents to stake out the bath houses?
LMOAO...The Pink Panther has become a reality! The next remake of I Spy will not star a white guy and a black guy, we will see Nathan Lane and Rue Paul as the butt kicking spies instead. Or maybe Madam Edna and Eddie Murphy.
Butt "kicking" or butt "--"?
I was at an airport in India, a couple of years ago, and I went into a cafe for some tea and heard someone ask for an "LGBT" sandwich. I fell about laughing, but they were actually selling "LGBT" sandwiches.
Mark Steyn did a piece about how you can never keep up with the victimhood community. I guarantee that the CIA's diversity list, whether or not it's genuine, will not meet with favour from those who live to be victimised. Steyn pointed out that using the term "LGBT" would get you into hot water (if you were daft enough to care), at least a year ago, because the term cavalierly ignored a whole swathe of thitherto unsuspected persuasions, which can, of course, be augmented ad infinitum.
Because nobody would ever notice a bunch of guys dressing like women in an Islamic country.
Their dresses could be disguised as parachutes so when they get tossed off of tall buildings they could just float to the ground. (snicker)
Quite. That life-style choice does tend somewhat to limit an agent's deployability
Kind of what I was thinking. Unless we intend to spy on San Francisco, putting a man in a dress, in any of the countries we are at conflict with, would be a death sentence for him/her/it/thang.
Please tell me that this is an April Fool that escaped into the big, wide world a few weeks early.
"“We will continue to enrich our workforce by targeting diverse communities across the United States to meet our talent needs, with dedicated programs for citizens of African, Asian, Hispanic, Middle Eastern, South Asian, and Native American descent; Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Individuals; Persons with Disabilities; Veterans; and Women,” the CIA said."
What about Maoris and Australian Aboriginals? Wacist bigots!
Is Lewis Carroll running Washington DC, these days?
Looks like it was a bad move to put Monty Python in charge of the CIA.
View Comments (15)
Well at least Brucelyn Jenner can get a job now that it's TV shopped flopped like a dead fish on a hot beach.
I just saw an item today that Brucelyn is saying how it's getting much more flak for being a Conservative than for being a tranny!
More liberal tolerance on display!
Hey, back of Brucelyn's case, she's one of us...
No…wait...
Yep.
Does this mean the CIA is investigating Barky, and needs undercover agents to stake out the bath houses?
LMOAO...The Pink Panther has become a reality! The next remake of I Spy will not star a white guy and a black guy, we will see Nathan Lane and Rue Paul as the butt kicking spies instead. Or maybe Madam Edna and Eddie Murphy.
Butt "kicking" or butt "--"?
I was at an airport in India, a couple of years ago, and I went into a cafe for some tea and heard someone ask for an "LGBT" sandwich. I fell about laughing, but they were actually selling "LGBT" sandwiches.
Mark Steyn did a piece about how you can never keep up with the victimhood community. I guarantee that the CIA's diversity list, whether or not it's genuine, will not meet with favour from those who live to be victimised. Steyn pointed out that using the term "LGBT" would get you into hot water (if you were daft enough to care), at least a year ago, because the term cavalierly ignored a whole swathe of thitherto unsuspected persuasions, which can, of course, be augmented ad infinitum.
Because nobody would ever notice a bunch of guys dressing like women in an Islamic country.
Their dresses could be disguised as parachutes so when they get tossed off of tall buildings they could just float to the ground. (snicker)
Quite. That life-style choice does tend somewhat to limit an agent's deployability
Kind of what I was thinking. Unless we intend to spy on San Francisco, putting a man in a dress, in any of the countries we are at conflict with, would be a death sentence for him/her/it/thang.
Please tell me that this is an April Fool that escaped into the big, wide world a few weeks early.
"“We will continue to enrich our workforce by targeting diverse communities across the United States to meet our talent needs, with dedicated programs for citizens of African, Asian, Hispanic, Middle Eastern, South Asian, and Native American descent; Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Individuals; Persons with Disabilities; Veterans; and Women,” the CIA said."
What about Maoris and Australian Aboriginals? Wacist bigots!
Is Lewis Carroll running Washington DC, these days?
Looks like it was a bad move to put Monty Python in charge of the CIA.