How stupid are NYTimes reporters

How stupid are NYTimes reporters? Reporter Maggie Haberman, trying to mock Trump’s executive order on immigration, asked a snarky question about terrorism on Twitter and got handed her ass.

This post was last modified on January 31, 2021

J.P. Travis: Born and raised in Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1976 graduate of University of Michigan, father, grandfather, husband, founder and CEO of Travelyn Publishing (http://www.travelynpublishing.com/), and passionate anti-government believer in individual liberty.

View Comments (17)

    • My thoughts precisely for a while now. But it seems the women in Europe are actually an attraction. Could it be the Women's March last week in DC was an advertisement of sorts, not to be outdone by their Euro sisters? No offense to real patriotic ladies, but historically, women do accept their conquerors. It's just particularly retarded to wish for it. (Sado-masochism??)

      • Not all women. You are right that patriotic women will not accept anything of this nature. Historically it was a woman that essentially killed Momo. I would rather kill or be killed than "accept" conquerors of that caliber. I am sure many women especially nowadays will too. That is especially true of many United Stater women. There maybe women who may not be necessarily patriotic but as women they don't accept this either. That is the majority of women.

        With that said, the women that DO end up "accepting" that situation (as in UNWILLINGLY) are women who are devoid of men that should be doing the fighting to protect them and children from evil forces or conquering forces. There is no alternative, women generally speaking have weaker bodies than men, they have less prowess in using weapons than men, they value their lives and/or most importantly the lives of their children so what alternative do they have? European men have lost their balls and that comes after many African and Asian men have lost them also. We will see how American (and especially the US) male population will fare against the Muslim horde. Women and children will suffer always when "THEIR" men stop being men and stop doing what they are supposed to do. The women in Africa, Asia and Europe who have been victimized by the Muslim horde have been because the men failed to protect them, not just in government but also men on the streets. Very many videos of women being harassed on the streets even violated and men passing by doing nothing. There was one video of cops that were thankfully around and able to save a girl from being violated, but the stories of men actually doing something to stop the Muslim horde be it government officials or citizens is minimal and pitiful. Minor number of women if any, that actually WANT to be "conquered" in this way are that: a minority.

        As for THESE particular minority type of women (and by the way the legs is photoshopped in that photo) in Europe and the USA who MAY seem attracted to these type of invasion, as you claim, are probably women who are tired of the local men, they have a fantasy of some kind of the virility of the "conquering" horde, etc. They are sick and not normal and thus not part of the actual normal status of women.

        • I certainly hope you're right about that last point. And yes, I do realize that women are, as booty and otherwise, taken wholesale during war, notwithstanding. And it's sad of course, even in a "fair" fight between two warring sides where the men actually do defend their habitat... But there is no argument that European nations accepting the current mass rape is in any way a fair fight. It's an open invitation of invasion. And the way things are going here in the USA, the kool aid is pretty toxic. Both for the men and the women.

  • I had a 3 hour phone conversation with an old friend who is libtardia-maximiliosa and I took away 2 things:

    1) Some people (many, sadly) are beyond seeing the forest from the trees when it comes to being a Lefty. It truly is all about how loving and moral and ethical they are, come hell or high water (ie, violent protests). When pressed on this hell or high water possibly leading to bigger problems, they insist no such thing would actually occur merely from their philosophy and that it is instead the opposition who ultimately would screw up this, their righteous works of humanity. (Queue John Lennon song... )

    2) Suddenly, as if their OWS had nothing to do with anti one-percenters, the world's wealthiest people are now our most-trusted friends and financial globalization is our pride and joy. The banks merely needed a new Glass-Steagall when they were given a trillion dollars, of tax-payer money, but no other demands should have been made, because (suddenly) libtards understand how important it is not to impose upon private business practices (of the wealthy, that is... y'know, the ones who give us all that awesome technology which follows us everywhere, thank goodness). Glass-Steagall didn't happen, of course, but that's a minor thing. Much more minor than all those abortion clinics being blown up everyday. This is why your little 25 round Ruger 22LR mags are illegal in CA and NY. It's just too easy to go on a rampage with those.

    So, my point is that the Libtards are beyond hope, no matter what. If the wind changes, they change their tune. They have no actual beliefs beyond the narrative they're given, and evidently, the "journalist" in question missed getting her daily does of bullshit that morning before going on Twitter.

    PS - There is a huge danger in talking too long with these people. They will make you wish for communism just in order to get them to STFU already.

    • I feel bad for you. Because of your personal situation, you are expected to be compliant with the leftard party line. It must really suck to have everyone assume you agree with them on their wacko, leftist, stupidity.

      • I am at school lately, picking up a few college credits... I've already "had it out" with the "Social Development" instructor and it's even getting tense with my psyche professor as well. The only teacher I have no problem with (so far) is the Biology prof, who actually looks gay but is totally professional at his job in class. Very little in the way of his personal opinion on anything, unlike the other two who continually inject their shit into the curriculum.

        BTW: If one fails the Soc Dev class, the school will reject the student's degree, regardless if they are a 4.0 student.

          • To stay out of trouble, since I am disabled and otherwise home-bound. I was doing part-time video work but try as I might, I have issues. So I'm trying school. I doubt I will ever get a Bachelor's unless I pay for one course every semester out-of-pocket. (The FinAid is not really enough to go beyond Community College and I can't do a FT course load, so even loans would not be practical.) While I am studying for an Assoc of Science, there is likely no job or career at the end of this. I might volunteer or work PT in drug/alcohol counseling, perhaps. I don't know what I can handle in that respect, even as a supplement to my SSDI.

          • I truly need to find out how the other guys handle this crap in my class. I just don't know if it's safe to ask.

  • This "reporter" has failed at life. Her teachers should be embarrassed or maybe they would be proud. She is an embarrassing person and I actually feel bad for her.