Trump caught on tape making crude, sexually aggressive comments about women

Trump caught on tape making crude, sexually aggressive comments about women. Imagine what Bill Clinton has said the past, not to mention the current.

‘I don’t even wait,’ he said — and bragged about how he would ‘grab them by the p—y.’

CO2Insanity: Tired of the CO2 BS and all the other BS in the US and the world.

View Comments (14)

    • Funny, when we were saying Trump would blow this whole thing, people laughed at us. We said he would screw this up, and give it to Hitlery, but people called us jerks and that were just sore because Cruz lost. Now, we don’t look quite so dumb, do we?

    • A true man of the world. That's why he gets so many of the democratic crossover votes. The world is looking for hope and change, but they will turn their back on morality the only thing that will heal this world.

  • This wasn't that long ago so can't blame youthful indiscretion. He is a bragger... he could be lying or he could be talking about the hoes that he treated like hoes because they were hoes...

    Some women be all wanting to get in front of a rich man and allow themselves to be treated like gold digging hoes to get that money. That is why many women (not all) went to Bill Cosby's apartment or hotel rooms when he asked them. They were hoes hoping to start an affair with him, knowing fully well he is married. The truth is that had he just had sex with them normally (and maybe give them a nice gift or some money for their service after) and not drugged them or violated them without their expressed permission (I can't provide a percentage) but I assume a great majority of those women wouldn't or couldn't claim rape. Because he drugged them and did not ask nor waited for permission he did rape them.

    Now I have NO IDEA (and I hope not) if this is the case with Trump. He is probably talking about them hoes and he got permission for actual sexual activity if it ever happened.

    I don't want to be harsh with females, because I am one, but a lot depends on how one conducts oneself. If a woman conducts herself as a lady she is not going to get groped (under normal circumstances: there is no alcohol or drugs involved, etc.). The most that usually happens (again under normal circumstances) is for men to put their hands on the back of a woman's back or on her shoulder or something to that effect, as a lady I have experienced that and I have made it known immediately that such handling is not appreciated as I did not give permission for that. Most men apologize, few do not, but all of them certainly never do that shit again. It takes a highly narcissistic, extremely aggressive man to completely refuse to see all the signs that a woman is a lady to be THIS aggressive upon meeting her, and I would even dare say even under those circumstances I am thinking alcohol or some kind of mental situation has got to be an additional issue.

    With hoes though.... you all out there just KNOW what I mean... they give off this whiff and this scent and this sense that they are touchable you know what I mean? So not all, but a lot of men will go there and for the most part be right that the ho is there to be available.

    Now... Donald Trump is egoistic perhaps to the near extreme and he is an aggressive male, but he is a man of the world, that has to do a lot of business with men and women around the world. He hires women as well who have to be competent to deal with the demands he has. I can't imagine he doesn't read women well enough (considering his experience) to know that if a woman gives off the lady vibe even though he is egoistic and aggressive he will not be touching her inappropriately.

    We will have to wait and see. There has been an accusation of rape already but that went away really fast.

    It is gross though but in truth it was a private conversation. I know some people don't like this, but it is a good reason to give out. If we taped male locker rooms private conversations all around the world and male bathrooms I wonder if any man out there could claim innocence of this kind of crude talk?

    Women are also guilty of this but not to this extreme, but still in private men and women say things to one another they wouldn't discuss in public nor to certain types of people.

    • I've heard people defend other politicians licentiousness, saying things like "we aren't electing the leader of the church but the leader of the nation." I remember the MSM defending Bill Clinton, saying he has a libido problem. I'm not going to defend Trump. What he said was wrong. I will still vote for him, because it ALL boils down to the lesser of two evils, or more precisely who will do the less damage to our liberty. The left and the MSM would have no problem with Lucifer himself being the nominee, but the right had better come up with a saint.

      • Just to be clear, I wasn't defending Trump, I was putting out a moderate point of view. Bill Clinton has actually raped women (and possibly minors) and used his power to entice women to be of sexual service to him and slept with willing whores and committed adultery again and again, all of that is nasty and wrong and indefensible, but the media protected him but he should be in prison. Unless Trump actually raped women, this is a distraction. Indefensible, but a distraction of no actual criminal nature. He was bragging about women who basically allowed themselves to be manhandled due to his popularity. We all know that happens, they are called groupies. So those women get to share in the blame for the nastiness they are not innocent.

        Also there is an issue of privacy here that is supposed to be a hallmark for Conservatives and Moderates both.

        I agree that they have no care who they put forward as long as he or she aligns to their point of view. The truth is that Trump, had he ran Democrat (and no Hillary), this would be swept under the rug. Due to Republicans running on faith based issues they are expected to run perfect people. But we ALL know the man is NOT perfect so why is this a surprise or being used as a minus? We know the man is "experienced"

        • Oh, I agree with everything you are saying. I was just exposing the hypocrisy of the left. Unless there is a nation wide revival I feel this country will never elect a true born again Christian that openly practices his faith. Huckabee and Cruz are perfect examples. Their faith was attacked, by some on the right, just as aggressively as it was from most on the left.
          Like you posted earlier, that Trump is a man of the world, is true. A fallen world that looks at evangelical Christians as religious zealots out to force Christianity on everyone. For a while now I've had the feeling that Trump has the better chance in the general election than Cruz would have. The world wants a worldly leader and it will eventually get one. I'm just hoping Trump will buy America a little more time to enjoy what little liberty we still have.

          • Yep... I agree. The world calls for a world leader, but even those can be tools in G-D's hands. Let's see what happens.

  • I can't say this enough, the Republicans picked the only candidate who couldn't beat Hillary.

    Trumps excuse of the recordings being a private conversation was the worst thing he could have said, because many already suspected this was who he is in reality.

    Equally repelling, he was married to his latest wife for 8 months demonstrating zero respect for the sanctity of marriage and his wife. More women will be repulsed.

    • I am grossed out by what he said absolutely, just like I was with that racist NBA old ass dude, but I don't feel comfortable with private conversations being taped and made public. I guess because he is running for the Presidency people feel he has no right to privacy anymore, but that is a discussion for another time.

      • Trump, in my opinion, has said worse. His stints on the Howard Stern show and his disgusting comment about avoiding venereal disease being his "own personal Vietnam" demonstrated he was a vulgar and crude narcissist and when he made that statement totally aware he was broadcasting.

        What about his public statements about Megan Kelly & Carly Fiorina?

        Trump's "private conversation" only proved what many had already thought about him. Who couldn't see his tax returns being leaked & forty years of bawdy comments and behavior being October surprises? My friends who support him are so spitting mad at the "establishment" they only cared about tearing down the house. They ignored what they knew, never make a decision while your angry.

        Well, they are going to get what they wanted, the Republican party will be destroyed, but so will In God We Trust, E Pluribus Unum, and Liberty.

    • I can’t say this enough, the Republicans picked the only candidate who couldn’t beat Hillary.

      Just think that bears repeating. Because it's the pure, distilled truth. And when you go back in time and think about it, and consider the Clintons' long-time, dirty, low-down conniving for White House power, you realize nobody on Earth had more motivation and more ability to maneuver Donald Trump into getting the Republican nomination than Hillary Clinton. We already know he received more Democrat votes than Republican during the nomination campaign. Now we know why. There's nobody else on this planet Hillary could stand up to in terms of brains, morals, or trustworthiness without looking bad in comparison. Against Donald Trump she almost looks presentable. So that's why CNN, MSNBC, and all those other media sources who are so in the bag for Hillary that they almost seem like adjuncts of the Democrat Party, were, during the nomination contest, giving so much favorable air time to Donald Trump. The Republican Party was played. Conservatives were played. Anybody who supported this letch was played.