Trump: ‘I Had Absolutely Nothing to Do With’ National Enquirer Story on Alleged Cruz Mistresses

Trump: ‘I Had Absolutely Nothing to Do With’ National Enquirer Story on Alleged Cruz Mistresses. Trump be like doing a Sergeant Schultz….I see nothing, I hear nothing, I know nothing.

This post was last modified on January 26, 2021

Donald TrumpMistressesNational EnquirerTed Cruz
CO2Insanity: Tired of the CO2 BS and all the other BS in the US and the world.

View Comments (15)

  • Trump expects people to believe this load of crap while simultaneously lying to people about Cruz being responsible for the GQ picture of Melania.

    What a douche.

  • Those that hate Trump and want so much to blame him for Cruz's CUBAN MISTRESS CRISIS have to explain awy Jeff Roe his campaign manage being the one GQ says ordered the pictures of Trump's wife, The Washington Times CONFIRMS at least 2 of the women's involvement and Rubio offered the story to B'bart first AND that the whole story has been common knowledge in Washington for months. Finally there seems to be video of Cruz and a woman leaving a hotel on consecutive Tuesdays and Thursdays. Laugh at Trump if you want but he will will nomination and crush Clinton in November if the Democrats pas a law allowing her to run from prison. Want more? Reuters:Trump 54/37 in head to head over Cruz. keep laughing.

    • It wasn't the Washington Times, it was a columnist for the Washington Times, and this is what he said in total, all of it in one tweet: "From what I know, at least 2 of the women named as Cruz mistresses by the National Enquirer are accurate."

      What does that even mean? That he knows they had an affair with Cruz, or that he knows who they are and that there are rumors? And if he knows who they are and knows the allegations are true, why doesn't he name them? Why hasn't he written a column about it?

      We already have two of the five angrily denying the story, and we know the Washington Times turned the story down when it was offered to them, so it seems odd to me that the Times would turn the story down--which means lack of evidence--if they have a columnist with any kind of proof about the story being true.

  • So Trump is claiming that he had no idea that his own campaign spokesperson was one of the women his only viable rival for the presidential nomination had an affair with, and had no idea that the Nat'l Enquirer, which he has a known association with, was going to print this story?

    Anybody want to buy a bridge?

      • The point is, that Trump's Campaign Spokesperson is one of the women they claim Cruz is having an affair with.
        If it was true, it would have broken much sooner, and I personally find her repulsive. Almost as repulsive as Nomiki Konst.

        • What I don't like is that he would have been okay with a person that supports him to have a tarnish reputation.

  • Being this came from a mass media outlet, I'm betting this is a Klinton hit job.

Related Post
  1. The Great Clarence Thomas Blows Up Colorado Lawyer’s Argument for Kicking President Trump Off the State’s Ballot and Leaves Him Stumped
  2. Biden ‘did not remember when he was vice president,’ when his son Beau died, during special counsel interviews
  3. After RedState’s Reporting Rocked RNC Winter Meeting, Ronna McDaniel Is Stepping Down