Conservatives are constantly told how unsophisticated they are. That they’re rubes. Bumpkins. Recent refugees from turnip trucks.
Well, listen here, you liberal city slickers. You can keep your sophistication, if that’s what they call it over at Vanity Fair magazine these days.
The current issue features an interview with MSBNC host Rachel Maddow. It’s probably the most bizarre interview ever conducted by a major publication. We’ll just tease you with this bizarre exchange:
Vanity Fair: Miss “Cable Queen,” as Vogue calls you, do you suffer from any paraphilia?
Maddow: Paraphilia?
Vanity Fair: Listen to this saucy pedant. Paraphilia is having a rare erotic fetish. Perhaps you may indulge in eproctophilia?
Maddow: Duh?
Vanity Fair: Darling! Eproctophiliacs are those sexually turned on by farts and farting!
Maddow: That word actually exists?
As you can see, we are simply not smart enough, not sophisticated enough, not freakin’ loony enough to be good leftists.
Bumpkins of the world unite!
Source: Vanity Fair
This post was last modified on January 26, 2021
View Comments (5)
I have pointed out countless times about how the media just kisses Madcows ass, & they won't stop. Despite the fact she has done absolutly nothing to deserve any of the fawning coverage. She has believed her coverage, & she has become lazy because of it, & that's why she sucks.
So let's review...Madcow is seen as smart & talented, she is promoted as the next big thing & the "IT" girl, she then gets a show on AirAmerica. At about the same time, she started appearing MSNBC as a guest & impressed someone there. Then every "elite" media paper & mag just kissed her ass left, right, & center, but despite all of the articles, her ratings tanked at AirAmerica & her show went away. But she still has her MSNBC show, which is also tanking in the ratings. Sure, she's doing ok by MSNBC standards, but her ratings still suck. But yet, we still see pieces like this Vanity Fair piece, despite the fact she is bombing & she's not going to turn the corner, we NEED to know more about her. Which leads me to the big question...who the hell is behind promoting this effing loser that America has clearly rejected on TV & radio? Who the eff is invested in seeing her take off? Either she can or she can't, if she has talent & can connect with people, it will happen. But since she's basically targeted toward Manhattan, the Beltway, parts of New England, Hollywood, the Bay Area, & a few gender students in a few university dorms, SHE DOES'NT WORK, & SHE WON'T EVER BE A SUCCESS, EVER. Why? Because she's been promoted despite her failures. So she never learns from her failures because someone is always patting her on the head & praising her.
BOTTOM LINE IS THIS... The next big thing will never be big because it ain't good enough to be big. I say big deal, & most of America agrees with me when I look at the numbers. Go Away Rachel, just go.
All the people at MSNBC are sick in the head. I am neither Republican or Democract and I will stay that way. People who would vote for the complete FRAud in the White House should be locked up for your own safety and everyone else.
"Smart oozes....?" Maybe that's like that stuff that trickled down Chris Mathews' head because there doesn't seem much 'smart' left in EITHER of them!
from the article:
"Smart oozes from your every pore; it is sometimes too intimidating for G.W. to even watch The Rachel Maddow Show. "
Surely, they are just mocking her, right?
Smart oozes from your every pore
I didn't know smart could be cured with penicillin.