CO2Insanity: Tired of the CO2 BS and all the other BS in the US and the world.
View Comments (84)
So I've been viewing YT vids featuring Congessman Trey Gowdy Ben Shapiro and Congessman Jason Chaffetz as well as Steven Crowder. I'm learning a lot from these men. Not the least of which is the importance of informed civil political discourse and how the right needs to be able to engage the left. That being said, bullizard$hitcreek is a pab.
This morning , me and several of my neighbors burnt a New Orleans saints flag in effigy, I now have a Dallas Cowboys Flag hanging on my veranda, people driving by giving me a thumbs up gesture less than ten minutes from Superdome
As usual the Huffington Post has gone off half-cocked, more interested in propagating a leftwing political agenda than getting the facts straight. The woman herself says she was not sexually harassed and says she was invited to his hotel, not his hotel room:
People who read the Huffington Post are not interested in the truth, merely in finding BS to support their own preconceived notions.
1) When a normal man invites a woman to his hotel room it's an invitation, not sexual harassment. The woman in question here didn't work for Fox News so by definition it can't be sexual harassment. She declined so end of story.
2) When a famous man invites a woman to his hotel room it's not necessarily an invitation for anything more than a conversation. Famous people can't meet in the hotel bar like normal people because they get mobbed. Personally, I think that's how they get in trouble. If I was famous I would act the same and not invite women to my room even if it's a giant suite with bar and living room. As we all know, Pence admitted he won't even eat with a woman and the left ridiculed him for being so uptight, but now the left is ridiculing Hannity for the opposite? Make up your mind. Personally I come down on the side of Pence. He's showing respect to his wife.
I am not even sure how Vice President's Pence's behavior could be considered uptight. He is saying essentially: "My wife and I hang out A LOT. Not only do I personally love it, but it is also done for precautions that a person in my position should always take" The hell is wrong with that?
Seriously? That is uptight? Having your wife with you? Taking her out and stuff? Really?
I don't even understand the heck is wrong with lefties? They are insane! We know that marriage is meant to be a protection for both spouses. Protection socially, morally and spiritually if conducted with sense and morals.
If a man loves and respects and values his wife to the point where he would ask her to please come with him everywhere social (be it for business or otherwise) and he has others in a room with a female he has to talk to or interact with for purely common sense reasons and that is considered uptight seriously people that think that have no morals nor sense.
These same people have no problem with alleged rapists and child molesters among their ranks, but if a person they don't like does the minimum that could possible resemble immoral behavior out of a sudden, they are evil incarnate...
Liberalism and everything of the Left is a mental disorder. These people need help.
Oh and for all we know, Mrs. Pence is a jealous woman who WANTS to make sure that her fine ass man don't get pawed or placed in a difficult position. I don't blame her for that! He is old and everything, but he looks like he came out of a box! For all we know she is trying to protect her man not necessarily from himself but FOR herself... why can't lefties think about that?
I hang around with my wife all the time. Nothing wrong with that. We get along great.
Good for you, but in crazy town it means you discriminate against women who want to hang with you without your wife around, seemingly because they won't get the same access and opportunities that your male friends get or something, but if you hang with women not your wife then you are a terrible person. You can't win.
Not me. California is under the sway of the powerful drug companies, plain and simple. I've heard you can buy a California politician on Craigs List for a song. Our children are over-vaccinated and vaccinated too soon. No other country injects so many drugs into its children. It's absurd.
Hey everyone bill Nye spoke at the D.C. rally today. Didn't you guys post a news article a while back saying he wouldn't be speaking? Fake news!
From the article:
"The March for Science is having a tough time deciding whether the march should focus on “diversity and inclusion” or health and climate policy.
They were supposed to have gotten their internal issues under control, but this week a new fight broke out over whether Bill Nye the Science Guy, the former children’s television host who considers himself the leader of the “pro-science movement” should lead the protest. The problem? Nye is a “white male.”
You've really gotta work on those reading/comprehension skills.
"Nye, who is not, in fact, a scientist, except on television (he’s an engineer by trade), was slated to be the March’s chair, and an announcement was made last week. But organizers quickly panicked that having Nye at the forefront of the event meant they might be substantiating the idea that scientists are only old white men."
To me this implies he was no longer the chair.
Yeah, when you make an explicit statement sometimes it is best not to hang it on the implicit.
Besides your complaint/question was:
"Didn’t you guys post a news article a while back saying he wouldn’t be speaking?"
Which is not something implied by the portion of the article that you quoted.
Fair enough. You got me. I can't win them all.
Good job.
What makes you think you have won any of them, other than your own delusions?
Bill Nye, NOT a science guy, just an engineer with a dumb bow tie...
So Google informed me today that my Bogus Hate Crimes website is in violation of their policies and I can no longer show Google ads. As far as I can tell I violate no policy but the website is definitely a conservative website. That's basically the issue. Google is at war to purify the Internet from anything conservative.
Why would you want to run Google ads anyway? It's not like they say anything useful.
Well I fixed them. Instead of advertising Google shit, I'm now advertising my own shit. I make more money selling books than those paltry pennies that come in from Google anyway.
This is all over the place... Twitter and Facebook as well. Just go to Youtube and find conservative commentators making the same point based on their videos being demonitized etc.
LOL
Is this same thing happening to all conservative websites? If not, then they either made a mistake or your website truly does violate their policies. Have you tried contacting them?
They don't provide a way to contact them. They're Google. They aren't interested in a discussion about it. They just tell you.
And yes, it happens to all conservatives on the Internet. Facebook even took Sean Hannity's site down the other day. Twitter takes a conservative down almost daily. But liberal sites? They don't ever get taken down, no matter what filthy disgusting stuff they post. You can fight them on it, try to use public pressure to embarrass them, but little sites like mine don't have the wherewithal to fight that battle all the time. So I will just take the Google ads off the site and hope someday the liberal billionaires who run the tech sector get their comeuppance.
Bill Clinton tried this very same thing in the Paula Jones case. It didn't work for him and I hope it won't work for Trump. But it would be good if you developed a better sense of history (or at least read to the third paragraph of the news stories you link) because you are making our jobs here far easier than they should be.
What did I say that was wrong? Of course I didn't support what Clinton did.
However, this doesn't excuse what Trump is pulling off here.
wow I thought Obama was the most corrupt President
Your implication was clearly that the Trump maneuver is beyond the normal sorts of corruption Presidents engage in. I was just trying to give you the historical perspective necessary to not sound like a jackass. That you already were aware of the precedent (of course if we consider executive privilege in general the precedent goes back much further) makes your commentary even more laughable than it was before.
How is it corrupt to respond to a lawsuit? You have a weird idea of what the word corrupt means. Corrupt is when you collect hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign governments for being Secretary of State. See the difference?
He is being a little bitch and claiming immunity. I thought he bragged so much about winning lawsuits?
The fact is he is claiming immunity because he knows he truly messed up.
Immunity is only one of five or six arguments his lawyers made. You didn't even read the link you posted, did you? That's what lawyers do, they make every argument they can think of and hope one of them works. I doubt on such a frivolous lawsuit they even consulted Trump. This certainly doesn't measure up to the blatant corruption of Clinton or Obama. Clinton made herself rich off her public position and Obama was using the power of the federal government to spy on and tyrannize his political opponents. Good grief, get some perspective.
Yes I read the article. I aware of the other arguments and I will admit one of them has merit. However, I can't believe his lawyers have audacity to use the "immunity" card.
Now his lawyers have audacity. A minute ago Trump was the most corrupt president because of this. Which is it, audacity or historical corruption? You really don't have any substance behind your comments do you? That's pretty much the definition of a troll.
LOL.
Did I retract my statement on Trump? Nope. I just added that his lawyers have audacity.
View Comments (84)
So I've been viewing YT vids featuring Congessman Trey Gowdy Ben Shapiro and Congessman Jason Chaffetz as well as Steven Crowder. I'm learning a lot from these men. Not the least of which is the importance of informed civil political discourse and how the right needs to be able to engage the left. That being said, bullizard$hitcreek is a pab.
This morning , me and several of my neighbors burnt a New Orleans saints flag in effigy, I now have a Dallas Cowboys Flag hanging on my veranda, people driving by giving me a thumbs up gesture less than ten minutes from Superdome
Anyone thinks this is true?
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_58fd5c6ee4b00fa7de153d2b
As usual the Huffington Post has gone off half-cocked, more interested in propagating a leftwing political agenda than getting the facts straight. The woman herself says she was not sexually harassed and says she was invited to his hotel, not his hotel room:
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/despite-reports-fmr-fox-guest-now-claims-she-was-never-sexually-harassed-by-sean-hannity/
People who read the Huffington Post are not interested in the truth, merely in finding BS to support their own preconceived notions.
1) When a normal man invites a woman to his hotel room it's an invitation, not sexual harassment. The woman in question here didn't work for Fox News so by definition it can't be sexual harassment. She declined so end of story.
2) When a famous man invites a woman to his hotel room it's not necessarily an invitation for anything more than a conversation. Famous people can't meet in the hotel bar like normal people because they get mobbed. Personally, I think that's how they get in trouble. If I was famous I would act the same and not invite women to my room even if it's a giant suite with bar and living room. As we all know, Pence admitted he won't even eat with a woman and the left ridiculed him for being so uptight, but now the left is ridiculing Hannity for the opposite? Make up your mind. Personally I come down on the side of Pence. He's showing respect to his wife.
I am not even sure how Vice President's Pence's behavior could be considered uptight. He is saying essentially: "My wife and I hang out A LOT. Not only do I personally love it, but it is also done for precautions that a person in my position should always take" The hell is wrong with that?
Seriously? That is uptight? Having your wife with you? Taking her out and stuff? Really?
I don't even understand the heck is wrong with lefties? They are insane! We know that marriage is meant to be a protection for both spouses. Protection socially, morally and spiritually if conducted with sense and morals.
If a man loves and respects and values his wife to the point where he would ask her to please come with him everywhere social (be it for business or otherwise) and he has others in a room with a female he has to talk to or interact with for purely common sense reasons and that is considered uptight seriously people that think that have no morals nor sense.
These same people have no problem with alleged rapists and child molesters among their ranks, but if a person they don't like does the minimum that could possible resemble immoral behavior out of a sudden, they are evil incarnate...
Liberalism and everything of the Left is a mental disorder. These people need help.
Oh and for all we know, Mrs. Pence is a jealous woman who WANTS to make sure that her fine ass man don't get pawed or placed in a difficult position. I don't blame her for that! He is old and everything, but he looks like he came out of a box! For all we know she is trying to protect her man not necessarily from himself but FOR herself... why can't lefties think about that?
I hang around with my wife all the time. Nothing wrong with that. We get along great.
Good for you, but in crazy town it means you discriminate against women who want to hang with you without your wife around, seemingly because they won't get the same access and opportunities that your male friends get or something, but if you hang with women not your wife then you are a terrible person. You can't win.
Who else wishes every state would do this?
https://edsource.org/2017/california-kindergarten-vaccination-rates-reach-all-time-high-in-aftermath-of-new-law/580170
Not me. California is under the sway of the powerful drug companies, plain and simple. I've heard you can buy a California politician on Craigs List for a song. Our children are over-vaccinated and vaccinated too soon. No other country injects so many drugs into its children. It's absurd.
Hey everyone bill Nye spoke at the D.C. rally today. Didn't you guys post a news article a while back saying he wouldn't be speaking? Fake news!
From the article:
"The March for Science is having a tough time deciding whether the march should focus on “diversity and inclusion” or health and climate policy.
They were supposed to have gotten their internal issues under control, but this week a new fight broke out over whether Bill Nye the Science Guy, the former children’s television host who considers himself the leader of the “pro-science movement” should lead the protest. The problem? Nye is a “white male.”
You've really gotta work on those reading/comprehension skills.
http://rightwingnews.com/climate-change/surprise-warmists-march-washington-turns-hotbed-racial-whining/
Why didn't you quote this paragraph?
"Nye, who is not, in fact, a scientist, except on television (he’s an engineer by trade), was slated to be the March’s chair, and an announcement was made last week. But organizers quickly panicked that having Nye at the forefront of the event meant they might be substantiating the idea that scientists are only old white men."
To me this implies he was no longer the chair.
Yeah, when you make an explicit statement sometimes it is best not to hang it on the implicit.
Besides your complaint/question was:
"Didn’t you guys post a news article a while back saying he wouldn’t be speaking?"
Which is not something implied by the portion of the article that you quoted.
Fair enough. You got me. I can't win them all.
Good job.
What makes you think you have won any of them, other than your own delusions?
Bill Nye, NOT a science guy, just an engineer with a dumb bow tie...
https://youtu.be/yQ0eTO8Kuq4
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/329914-house-intel-panel-invites-former-acting-ag-yates-to-testify
Way to go Yates!! Speak the truth!!
http://anodtothegods.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ha.jpg
So Google informed me today that my Bogus Hate Crimes website is in violation of their policies and I can no longer show Google ads. As far as I can tell I violate no policy but the website is definitely a conservative website. That's basically the issue. Google is at war to purify the Internet from anything conservative.
Why would you want to run Google ads anyway? It's not like they say anything useful.
Well I fixed them. Instead of advertising Google shit, I'm now advertising my own shit. I make more money selling books than those paltry pennies that come in from Google anyway.
http://www.bogushatecrimes.com/Home.php
This is all over the place... Twitter and Facebook as well. Just go to Youtube and find conservative commentators making the same point based on their videos being demonitized etc.
LOL
Is this same thing happening to all conservative websites? If not, then they either made a mistake or your website truly does violate their policies. Have you tried contacting them?
They don't provide a way to contact them. They're Google. They aren't interested in a discussion about it. They just tell you.
And yes, it happens to all conservatives on the Internet. Facebook even took Sean Hannity's site down the other day. Twitter takes a conservative down almost daily. But liberal sites? They don't ever get taken down, no matter what filthy disgusting stuff they post. You can fight them on it, try to use public pressure to embarrass them, but little sites like mine don't have the wherewithal to fight that battle all the time. So I will just take the Google ads off the site and hope someday the liberal billionaires who run the tech sector get their comeuppance.
Why I don't advertise.
Try this link: https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/1704383?hl=en
Good luck!
As for your second paragraph, I can't speak much about that since I'm not familiar with those incidences.
wow I thought Obama was the most corrupt President?
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/17/politics/trump-immunity-lawsuits/?iid=ob_homepage_deskrecommended_pool
Bill Clinton tried this very same thing in the Paula Jones case. It didn't work for him and I hope it won't work for Trump. But it would be good if you developed a better sense of history (or at least read to the third paragraph of the news stories you link) because you are making our jobs here far easier than they should be.
What did I say that was wrong? Of course I didn't support what Clinton did.
However, this doesn't excuse what Trump is pulling off here.
wow I thought Obama was the most corrupt President
Your implication was clearly that the Trump maneuver is beyond the normal sorts of corruption Presidents engage in. I was just trying to give you the historical perspective necessary to not sound like a jackass. That you already were aware of the precedent (of course if we consider executive privilege in general the precedent goes back much further) makes your commentary even more laughable than it was before.
How is it corrupt to respond to a lawsuit? You have a weird idea of what the word corrupt means. Corrupt is when you collect hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign governments for being Secretary of State. See the difference?
He is being a little bitch and claiming immunity. I thought he bragged so much about winning lawsuits?
The fact is he is claiming immunity because he knows he truly messed up.
Immunity is only one of five or six arguments his lawyers made. You didn't even read the link you posted, did you? That's what lawyers do, they make every argument they can think of and hope one of them works. I doubt on such a frivolous lawsuit they even consulted Trump. This certainly doesn't measure up to the blatant corruption of Clinton or Obama. Clinton made herself rich off her public position and Obama was using the power of the federal government to spy on and tyrannize his political opponents. Good grief, get some perspective.
Yes I read the article. I aware of the other arguments and I will admit one of them has merit. However, I can't believe his lawyers have audacity to use the "immunity" card.
Now his lawyers have audacity. A minute ago Trump was the most corrupt president because of this. Which is it, audacity or historical corruption? You really don't have any substance behind your comments do you? That's pretty much the definition of a troll.
LOL.
Did I retract my statement on Trump? Nope. I just added that his lawyers have audacity.
You can do better than that JP. I believe in you.
Ouch!