CO2Insanity: Tired of the CO2 BS and all the other BS in the US and the world.
View Comments (90)
Trump still bringing in refugees at the same pace as Obama and from the same places: Syria, Somalia, Burma... radical Islamists by the thousands. More than 900 in the last week. So what do you think, Trumpsters? Trumpsters? Are you there?
As a liberal, this is good news. Thank you Trump for that.
And, of course, as a liberal, you have no clue what you are talking about.
He DOES applaud the destruction of America, like a good little liberal.
"lol more insults. You seem to be struggling to prove there are a group of liberals that feel that way. I get it. I don’t want to push it any further so I will leave it there since you don’t have a response that contains substance."
There was no insult in that particular post. I don't know what you are talking about. I stated what you stated was silly not necessarily that you were. If you are so easily insulted then perhaps it is not worthy for me to give you more of my time. I thought that you could be reason with. Perhaps I was mistaken?
No I am not struggling at all. Prove liberals feel what way? You need to be more specific. What are you specifically talking about?
“Health concerns, issues about adoption, not enough information on children being in such homes are reasons.”
LOL. what? I must say I never heard of such reasons so apparently you are just clinging to anything just to prove a point. Since we are at it, I will take a bite. People should be banned from marriage based on health concerns? Well, what about those that are obese? Issues on adoption? What are the issues. Not enough information on children being in homes? What does that even mean?"
If you never heard such reasons then you may need to study the issue a bit further?
Actually health concerns were not merely an homosexual issue as heterosexuals (and perhaps even now) had to prove they were healthy by providing blood test results before getting a license in many states/counties.
There aren't enough studies on children living in homes of gay pairs/parents. That is what that was about.
lol don't worry I'm not thinned skinned. I was just a bit shock that you started to give up so easily and started throwing out insults. We are just getting started. Don't give up -- I believe in you.
You may the claim about liberals and sharia law. The burden of proof lies upon you. I have never read or heard about any liberal politician or group of liberals that feel that way. I am curious to see evidence of such a thing.
From what I understand, some states test for diseases such as HIV. In some cases, they can refuse to issue you a marriage license. With that being said, why not allow gays to get married if they pass the blood test.
There are plenty of studies on children living in homes of gay parents.
That's my point the claim that you say I stated NEVER happened and it is clear, but you want to make the point that I did, which I didn't. That is why I cannot be bothered with you. You want to work on that issue claiming an issue that is not there. You know it unless you are stupid and many of your posts you have proven you aren't. So you are doing it for motives that I can only assume aren't benevolent. The process is tainted and when that happens it makes no sense to continue with the person that tainted it. All you want is for me to defend positions that I did not take. It is a liberal tactic. That is a fact, not an insult.
No there aren't "plenty" of studies that are long term more than 18 years either. "The burden of proof lies upon you." indeed, yet you posted none... Anyway it doesn't matter...
I have to write outside of those threads because it is impossible to read...
"lol! From my experience, whoever starts insulting during a debate do some either because they are wrong or are struggling to find a response.
Back to your point, your previous statement mentions “liberals” as if it was making a general statement. What’s the point of bringing that up if it’s not representative of most of the group?"
There was actually no insult in that particular post either. You ARE a liberal so how is that an insult to point it out? Your reading comprehension is perhaps colored by your liberalism because you read what was not there to make a point that is not even in discussion. That is not an insult is an observation and you yourself know exactly what I mean for below, someone mis-read what you actually wrote and you corrected the person, and chances are that the person non liberal point of view very possible colored his post. If you are this easily insulted then I am not going to bother with you anymore then.
Considering I have been very complete in my responses to you, not sure how you can say that I am struggling for a response.
In any case, I think that everyone's assessment of you was correct. So I will not be wasting anymore of my time. Have a nice life. Bye.
Giving up already? I think you were the one that got offended since you stopped the conversation so quickly.
If you don't want to debate me fair enough. Thank you for your time and good luck.
I did want to debate you, but:
1. You kept wanting to change the conversation based on your bias by accusing me of stating something that wasn't stated at all. This was done enough times to show a pattern. Then denying that you did it or else not acknowledging that you did which shows disrespect for the process, which means that you aren't interested in debate at all.
2. Knee jerking for stating a fact or a truth and calling it an insult.
You are a bomb thrower. You may do this as an exercise or you maybe getting paid and in truth, I believe several people are using this account, if that is true, this means that there is collusion to just throw bombs, hoping to get Conservatives to state something that you can use in other sites as proof of conservatives being racists or whatever. If I am right someone with more time than me can research online and find websites with quotes perhaps even misinterpreted, from us. If not then you just like to mess with people.
Either case, you haven't shown actual interest in debate and hence why I am not going to waste more time with you. I am giving up on you not the process. Every once and again there is a liberal who is sincere in wanting to learn about the other side, that is not you in my opinion.
Personally, I think people should not engage you anymore for it just emboldens you to throw more bombs.
"While you are correct with that one particular example, that does not apply to all animal homosexual activity. Your argument fails because you imply that any act associated with dominance is because of homosexuality."
I made no such implication whatsoever, AGAIN you read what you wanted to read not what was written. If you are not going to be accurate nor truthful then it is of no use for me to debate with you on anything, for all debates will be marred with stupidity and lies and then I will have to explain what it should have been obvious from the moment I wrote it as I tend to be very careful with my words. This is the last time I am going to write this. If I see you do it again, I will stop all communications with you. You are at least (so far) not as demented as another poster around here, you make good points sometimes and other times points that I don't agree with and I must sharpen myself as to why I don't agree with them and that makes for good debate, but if you are going to continually read what you want, and not actually read what it is there and then make a false argument, that means you have no respect for the process and I will not waste my time further.
ALL of your next points were made out of your INCORRECT assessment of what I actually wrote, so I am not going to waste my time responding to that.
Oh look, everyone's favorite drunken grandma is out in public again...
There is a lot of talk on this site about corrupt democrats. There is also a lot of talk about how the MSM continually covers up and even condones their corruption hence the name ihatethemedia. Corruption on the right is usually dealt with swiftly and severely, especially with the help of the MSM. You want to hear continual blather about the occasional minor corruption on the right, go back to the left wing media. They will tickle your ears with plenty of just that.
I visit both right wing and left wing sites. Left wing websites do the same thing (they cover up democrat scandals). I just wish both sides can be a bit more honest for the best of this country.
Do you even know what the guy did wrong? I don't. He cheated on his wife, sure, but that's not what he was gonna be charged with. Supposedly he used state resources to cover up his infidelity. What does that mean, he used the phone in his office? Seems like small potatoes compared to what other politicians are doing on a daily basis.
Here is the main concern:
"Auditor Jim Zeigler, who filed the complaint cited in the decision, accused the governor of misusing state resources, including state aircraft, security personnel and automobiles, to further his relationship with an aide, Rebekah Caldwell Mason."
Honestly, if the governor was a democrat, would more republicans be talking about it?
Yeah, he couldn't get away with what Bill Clinton got away with. Thanks for making my point.
Here's the difference: Republicans don't need to talk about it because they get rid of their crooked politicians. Democrats reelect them, defend them, lie about what they did, cover it up, whatever they need to do. Look at Hillary: she took a $100,000 bribe while her husband was governor and Democrats ended up nominating her for the presidency. And never mind all the hundreds of millions she and Bill took in bribes while she was SoS.
But, did he spew DNA in the Oval Office?
So, what you're saying is that a Republican can't get away with what Bill Clinton did. We already knew that.
lol...I literally didn't say that. I have no idea how you derive that interpretation.
However, Bill Clinton was impeached though.
As Bentley would have been had he not resigned first and been charged with misdemeanors. One had his career ended because of his misdeeds and the other one remained being President and because he kept on being President has made tens of millions of dollars for pay for play and "speeches". Sorry this distinction is too subtle for you.
You can't say that for certain. We would never know if Bentley would have got off.
As for Bill Clinton, I guess democrat supporters are a bit more forgiving. They forgave him and moved on. If republicans don't offer forgiveness to their own leaders than that's on them (a bit hypocritical too since the Bible talks about forgiveness).
You can’t say that for certain. We would never know if Bentley would have got off.
Of course it can't be said for certain. But Bentley was so convinced (that he would be impeached, removed and possibly jailed) that he cut a deal that drummed him out of office with no severance, no political future and no state protection and required him to plead guilty to crimes.
As for Bill Clinton, I guess democrat supporters are a bit more forgiving. They forgave him and moved on. If republicans don’t offer forgiveness to their own leaders than that’s on them (a bit hypocritical too since the Bible talks about forgiveness).
So you've gone from complaining that conservatives are not harsh enough on Bentley to complaining that they are too harsh. What a tenuous allegiance to consistency you have.
What a tenuous allegiance to consistency you have.
It's called going whatever way the breeze is blowing.
Because you're on the wrong website? I looked at your link and the comments section. It's the exact opposite of this one. Perhaps that's the one you belong on? Can you tell the difference between a square and a circle? Or are you just trying to make friends here?
So this site does select reporting on things that fit the right wing agenda?
How do you find out when your side makes mistakes?
You're being disingenuous with such a statement.
How so?
I f you paid any attention you would see that corrupt and stupid on either side are called out here.
That's good but it only seems to be centered around Mccain, Ryan and Trump.
To be fair, I say this same thing on liberal websites too.
View Comments (90)
Trump still bringing in refugees at the same pace as Obama and from the same places: Syria, Somalia, Burma... radical Islamists by the thousands. More than 900 in the last week. So what do you think, Trumpsters? Trumpsters? Are you there?
https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2017/04/13/trump-crosses-40000-refugees-mark-over-900-in-past-week-syrians-lead-the-pack-in-last-4-weeks/
As a liberal, this is good news. Thank you Trump for that.
And, of course, as a liberal, you have no clue what you are talking about.
He DOES applaud the destruction of America, like a good little liberal.
"lol more insults. You seem to be struggling to prove there are a group of liberals that feel that way. I get it. I don’t want to push it any further so I will leave it there since you don’t have a response that contains substance."
There was no insult in that particular post. I don't know what you are talking about. I stated what you stated was silly not necessarily that you were. If you are so easily insulted then perhaps it is not worthy for me to give you more of my time. I thought that you could be reason with. Perhaps I was mistaken?
No I am not struggling at all. Prove liberals feel what way? You need to be more specific. What are you specifically talking about?
“Health concerns, issues about adoption, not enough information on children being in such homes are reasons.”
LOL. what? I must say I never heard of such reasons so apparently you are just clinging to anything just to prove a point. Since we are at it, I will take a bite. People should be banned from marriage based on health concerns? Well, what about those that are obese? Issues on adoption? What are the issues. Not enough information on children being in homes? What does that even mean?"
If you never heard such reasons then you may need to study the issue a bit further?
Actually health concerns were not merely an homosexual issue as heterosexuals (and perhaps even now) had to prove they were healthy by providing blood test results before getting a license in many states/counties.
There aren't enough studies on children living in homes of gay pairs/parents. That is what that was about.
lol don't worry I'm not thinned skinned. I was just a bit shock that you started to give up so easily and started throwing out insults. We are just getting started. Don't give up -- I believe in you.
You may the claim about liberals and sharia law. The burden of proof lies upon you. I have never read or heard about any liberal politician or group of liberals that feel that way. I am curious to see evidence of such a thing.
From what I understand, some states test for diseases such as HIV. In some cases, they can refuse to issue you a marriage license. With that being said, why not allow gays to get married if they pass the blood test.
There are plenty of studies on children living in homes of gay parents.
That's my point the claim that you say I stated NEVER happened and it is clear, but you want to make the point that I did, which I didn't. That is why I cannot be bothered with you. You want to work on that issue claiming an issue that is not there. You know it unless you are stupid and many of your posts you have proven you aren't. So you are doing it for motives that I can only assume aren't benevolent. The process is tainted and when that happens it makes no sense to continue with the person that tainted it. All you want is for me to defend positions that I did not take. It is a liberal tactic. That is a fact, not an insult.
No there aren't "plenty" of studies that are long term more than 18 years either. "The burden of proof lies upon you." indeed, yet you posted none... Anyway it doesn't matter...
I have to write outside of those threads because it is impossible to read...
"lol! From my experience, whoever starts insulting during a debate do some either because they are wrong or are struggling to find a response.
Back to your point, your previous statement mentions “liberals” as if it was making a general statement. What’s the point of bringing that up if it’s not representative of most of the group?"
There was actually no insult in that particular post either. You ARE a liberal so how is that an insult to point it out? Your reading comprehension is perhaps colored by your liberalism because you read what was not there to make a point that is not even in discussion. That is not an insult is an observation and you yourself know exactly what I mean for below, someone mis-read what you actually wrote and you corrected the person, and chances are that the person non liberal point of view very possible colored his post. If you are this easily insulted then I am not going to bother with you anymore then.
Considering I have been very complete in my responses to you, not sure how you can say that I am struggling for a response.
In any case, I think that everyone's assessment of you was correct. So I will not be wasting anymore of my time. Have a nice life. Bye.
Giving up already? I think you were the one that got offended since you stopped the conversation so quickly.
If you don't want to debate me fair enough. Thank you for your time and good luck.
I did want to debate you, but:
1. You kept wanting to change the conversation based on your bias by accusing me of stating something that wasn't stated at all. This was done enough times to show a pattern. Then denying that you did it or else not acknowledging that you did which shows disrespect for the process, which means that you aren't interested in debate at all.
2. Knee jerking for stating a fact or a truth and calling it an insult.
You are a bomb thrower. You may do this as an exercise or you maybe getting paid and in truth, I believe several people are using this account, if that is true, this means that there is collusion to just throw bombs, hoping to get Conservatives to state something that you can use in other sites as proof of conservatives being racists or whatever. If I am right someone with more time than me can research online and find websites with quotes perhaps even misinterpreted, from us. If not then you just like to mess with people.
Either case, you haven't shown actual interest in debate and hence why I am not going to waste more time with you. I am giving up on you not the process. Every once and again there is a liberal who is sincere in wanting to learn about the other side, that is not you in my opinion.
Personally, I think people should not engage you anymore for it just emboldens you to throw more bombs.
"While you are correct with that one particular example, that does not apply to all animal homosexual activity. Your argument fails because you imply that any act associated with dominance is because of homosexuality."
I made no such implication whatsoever, AGAIN you read what you wanted to read not what was written. If you are not going to be accurate nor truthful then it is of no use for me to debate with you on anything, for all debates will be marred with stupidity and lies and then I will have to explain what it should have been obvious from the moment I wrote it as I tend to be very careful with my words. This is the last time I am going to write this. If I see you do it again, I will stop all communications with you. You are at least (so far) not as demented as another poster around here, you make good points sometimes and other times points that I don't agree with and I must sharpen myself as to why I don't agree with them and that makes for good debate, but if you are going to continually read what you want, and not actually read what it is there and then make a false argument, that means you have no respect for the process and I will not waste my time further.
ALL of your next points were made out of your INCORRECT assessment of what I actually wrote, so I am not going to waste my time responding to that.
Oh look, everyone's favorite drunken grandma is out in public again...
http://www.weaselzippers.us/333697-ruth-bader-ginsburg-refers-to-lindsey-graham-as-one-of-the-women-of-the-senate/
I can't really argue with her on that.
I couldn't make it past a few minutes of that without puking in my sleep.
United Airlines has released a new seating chart.
https://charts.stocktwits.com/production/original_79805924.?1491847635
Copy and paste link in address bar and it will work.
This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
AccessDeniedAccess Denied
9C5B8E1A9839388A
VndIRc+o8HUNHKsFa/2rAlyU0/oQFZS4tIdf6hBn+PJUZDwAjqP/GVss7Ke1um0A40ACYdMyec4=
Here, is this better?
http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r153/poppajoe49/original_79805924-_zps7r4byeg0.jpeg
Jawohl mon capitán
https://youtu.be/4HR0P3sIb80
Kimmy https://youtu.be/fxMZ3omzXDM
How come this site doesn't report when republican politicians do things wrong?
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/10/us/alabama-governor-robert-bentley-meeting/index.html
Apparently your not paying attention...again.
Apparently gun free zones are a failure. May Jesus be with the kids in CA.
If red states hate abortions so much, how come they don't do this? Seems like a fair compromise to me:
http://boingboing.net/2017/04/09/evidence-based-policy.html
Everyone on here always talk about corrupt democrats.
Well, how about corrupt republicans?
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/328033-alabama-governor-to-face-impeachment-hearings
There is a lot of talk on this site about corrupt democrats. There is also a lot of talk about how the MSM continually covers up and even condones their corruption hence the name ihatethemedia. Corruption on the right is usually dealt with swiftly and severely, especially with the help of the MSM. You want to hear continual blather about the occasional minor corruption on the right, go back to the left wing media. They will tickle your ears with plenty of just that.
I visit both right wing and left wing sites. Left wing websites do the same thing (they cover up democrat scandals). I just wish both sides can be a bit more honest for the best of this country.
Do you even know what the guy did wrong? I don't. He cheated on his wife, sure, but that's not what he was gonna be charged with. Supposedly he used state resources to cover up his infidelity. What does that mean, he used the phone in his office? Seems like small potatoes compared to what other politicians are doing on a daily basis.
Here is the main concern:
"Auditor Jim Zeigler, who filed the complaint cited in the decision, accused the governor of misusing state resources, including state aircraft, security personnel and automobiles, to further his relationship with an aide, Rebekah Caldwell Mason."
Honestly, if the governor was a democrat, would more republicans be talking about it?
Yeah, he couldn't get away with what Bill Clinton got away with. Thanks for making my point.
Here's the difference: Republicans don't need to talk about it because they get rid of their crooked politicians. Democrats reelect them, defend them, lie about what they did, cover it up, whatever they need to do. Look at Hillary: she took a $100,000 bribe while her husband was governor and Democrats ended up nominating her for the presidency. And never mind all the hundreds of millions she and Bill took in bribes while she was SoS.
But, did he spew DNA in the Oval Office?
So, what you're saying is that a Republican can't get away with what Bill Clinton did. We already knew that.
lol...I literally didn't say that. I have no idea how you derive that interpretation.
However, Bill Clinton was impeached though.
As Bentley would have been had he not resigned first and been charged with misdemeanors. One had his career ended because of his misdeeds and the other one remained being President and because he kept on being President has made tens of millions of dollars for pay for play and "speeches". Sorry this distinction is too subtle for you.
You can't say that for certain. We would never know if Bentley would have got off.
As for Bill Clinton, I guess democrat supporters are a bit more forgiving. They forgave him and moved on. If republicans don't offer forgiveness to their own leaders than that's on them (a bit hypocritical too since the Bible talks about forgiveness).
You can’t say that for certain. We would never know if Bentley would have got off.
Of course it can't be said for certain. But Bentley was so convinced (that he would be impeached, removed and possibly jailed) that he cut a deal that drummed him out of office with no severance, no political future and no state protection and required him to plead guilty to crimes.
As for Bill Clinton, I guess democrat supporters are a bit more forgiving. They forgave him and moved on. If republicans don’t offer forgiveness to their own leaders than that’s on them (a bit hypocritical too since the Bible talks about forgiveness).
So you've gone from complaining that conservatives are not harsh enough on Bentley to complaining that they are too harsh. What a tenuous allegiance to consistency you have.
What a tenuous allegiance to consistency you have.
It's called going whatever way the breeze is blowing.
Because you're on the wrong website? I looked at your link and the comments section. It's the exact opposite of this one. Perhaps that's the one you belong on? Can you tell the difference between a square and a circle? Or are you just trying to make friends here?
So this site does select reporting on things that fit the right wing agenda?
How do you find out when your side makes mistakes?
You're being disingenuous with such a statement.
How so?
I f you paid any attention you would see that corrupt and stupid on either side are called out here.
That's good but it only seems to be centered around Mccain, Ryan and Trump.
To be fair, I say this same thing on liberal websites too.