Wisconsin judge rules recount by hand isn’t necessary

Wisconsin judge rules recount by hand isn’t necessary. So will Dummy Jill appeal? Or, hang it up?

CO2Insanity: Tired of the CO2 BS and all the other BS in the US and the world.

View Comments (9)

  • And remember this is a Dane County judge, who has only to answer to the uber-Left voters of Madison.

    • I live in Minnesota, just 10 minutes from the Wisconsin border, & I have spent lots of time & money there. Despite it's reputation, WI ain't as deep blue as many think. Outside of Madison, which is almost all goov't paper pushers or they work for Bucky at UW, & Milwaukee with it's giant welfare class, WI is fairly conservative. It's mainly those 2 areas, the rest of the state, not so much.

  • Only thing the recount does is force the precincts to count the absentee votes. Guess what that does? Hmmm. 2/3 are conservative leaning. That means her margin widens not shrinks. Bring it.

  • Libbies are, as always, picking and choosing their reality. If they were to be intellectually consistent, then along with the squawks about popular vote, they should be demanding a re-vote for the top 2 candidates. Because the fact is that Hillary DID NOT win a majority (see danybhoy's numbers above. Or below, however it shows up). So please, just can it with the "will of the people" meme.

    Another request for intellectual consistency, in re margin of victory, statewide popular vote:

    PA Trump wins by 68,236 votes (we'll just put aside for now exactly how many dead and multiple voters have to come out of the woodwork, or exactly how incompetent are the vote counters to come up with nearly 70,000 more votes)

    WI Trump wins by 22,871
    MI Trump wins by 11,612

    Aside: if Hillary's minions find that many dead people in WI & MI whose votes were missed, it's still not enough - Trump still has 280 electoral votes to Hill's 258.

    But if we are to consider those margins of victory close enough to recount, then let's also recount (and check into voter fraud while we're at it):

    NV Hillary wins by 26,434
    ME Hillary wins by 20,035
    NH Hillary wins by 2,732

    Because after all, if there were that many "honest" mistakes by the vote counters and/or machines, it would be quite a coinkidinky that they should occur ONLY in the 3 relatively large states that Trump won by the least margins. Wouldn't such "mistakes" be spread around evenly without regard to what state or who won it?