90% of top newspapers leave Muslim and Islam out of Monday headlines

WSJ_130923.jpg


90% of top newspapers leave “Muslim” and “Islam” out of Monday headlines… over front page stories about Muslim terrorists attacking a mall in Kenya and Muslim suicide bombers blowing up a Christian church in Pakistan. Apparently the religion of the perpetrators was deemed irrelevant… and let’s be honest, who knows more about irrelevant than newspapers?

This post was last modified on March 30, 2021

J.P. Travis: Born and raised in Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1976 graduate of University of Michigan, father, grandfather, husband, founder and CEO of Travelyn Publishing (http://www.travelynpublishing.com/), and passionate anti-government believer in individual liberty.

View Comments (38)

  • Perhaps the "news" rags didn't want to give the MUrderous SLIMes any more undue publicity-- yeah, that's it....

    • There is only so much magic in the bag poppajoe49. Even if I did, he would find something else to bitch about. Silver maybe.

    • Hey pojo, still got your finger on the pulse of Jersey politics or hear about what's going on amongst the unwashed masses?

      "Maybe, just maybe, the people of New Jersey are finally seeing the real Cory Booker — all flash and no cash, all hat and no cattle, the show horse who isn't a work horse, every Tweet lacks meat. Because a new poll shows Steve Lonegan gaining ground on Booker's supposedly inevitable juggernaut"

      http://wyblog.us/blog/election/lonegan-closing-gap-on-booker.html

      • I still have family there, but they don't really follow politics. Corey Booker is one of those types that I can't stand to spend much time watching, because I hate to vomit.

  • Shameful and predictable reporting. The events over the last few days flies in the face of the left agenda when it comes to the religion of peace. Until the practitioners of the religion of peace are about to slay them, the weak kneed leftist will keep telling themselves and those stupid enough to believe them, that Islam is a peaceful religion. Yea right, and I can spin straw into gold too.

  • Hosea 4:6, "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge..."

    This verse refers to knowledge of God, but would definitely apply to our media keeping us in the dark when it comes to the evil that seeks to destroy us.

    • Agreed. That is one of the reasons why I am very unhappy with Christians in this country, who don't want to know about the Persecution that Christians around the world are under. It is too sad and too depressing and they would rather not know about it. Christians here we are not going to be safe from persecution when it is our turn especially when a good number are just blinded and deaf to the reality. Our lack of knowledge on the realities of this world is the reason why people like Obama are in power. We became too complacent and now we are seeing the outcome of it.

      • Too many Christians are complacent with the teachings that they will be raptured out of this world before the really bad stuff starts to happen. I'm not so keen that there will be a pre-tribulation rapture. Even so we should not just sit back and let evil triumph. I feel the end is close, but it could be another generation or more away. Think about what your kids, and grand kids are going to have to go through if that's the case. I've had Christians tell me "whats the use, it's the way things are meant to be". NO, it's not. We are supposed to work toward getting the Gospel to as many as we can before the judgement. A part of that is preserving the freedom to do so.

        All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
        Edmund Burke

        • There is nowhere in the Bible that the Rapture is prophesied. A couple of verses written during the Roman clamp down on the Jews about the same time the Temp[le was destroyed in Jerusalem. They refer to the Roman habit of just snatching people up. One would be taken, the other left behind. I'm afrais I don't believe in the Rapture, so maybe that's why I am concerned about the trend to ake Christians targets all over the world. Even here in the good ol' USA believing Christians are portrayed as mildly (or worse) insane, uneducated, ignorant, and believers in fairy tales. And we just sit and take it.

        • That's the problem and why, I believe, that Obama was able to win a second term. The good people felt that they would just wait for the rapture to save them, but thy are allowing evil to continue to grow. If everyone would resist the evil, then we would have a better chance of making a difference and possibly turning things around.

          • I believe El-Rushbo is correct on this one. He says Obama became President & was reelected, because people want to like him. They are not voting on his track record, but voting on what they think of him personally.

          • Frankly the political machine is just being educated on how best to engineer future public deceptions- just keep churning out candidates with Hollywood engineered "personalities" and make doubly sure that the media does not vet them. Rush's observation just confirmed that for them- as though they needed any confirmation.

        • Those are hard and truthful lyrics for real. Good for him.

          Yeah I did see that movie a couple of years ago or so. It was... weird to speak the truth.

  • The linked article used the word "journalism". it is NOT journalism- it is propaganda when key details are omitted for the purpose of furthering an agenda of political correctness and appeasing the enemy. The MUSLIM and ISLAMIC extremists are enemies of the United States regardless of whether our leadership insists on pursuing a policy of ass kissing.

    • I find it interesting no one has a problem calling Germans Krauts, or Japanese Japs. Or Italians wops, or Jew Hymies. But God forbid anythig gets said that may possibly be considered denigrating to muslims.

        • Probably the creep himself. This is what I was referring to on another thread when I said his comment about censoring just happened to fit the thread for a change. You use it often enough, you're bound to hit pay dirt occasionally

  • You mean 'alleged' attacks by 'alleged' terrorists who are allegedly 'alleged' Mu...,er, those who cannot be named lest they allegedly attack us.

    • It's just like crime reports, you aren't allowed to mention race, sex, age, or any other physical description of the perps because it might be RRRRAAAACCCIIIISSSSTTTT!

      • Do they really need to mention the suicide bombers were muzzie? Not to stereotype izlam, but aren't all suicide bombers towel headed stinkbeards? Oops, I mean muzlims? Adding 'muslim' to 'suicide bomber' would be redundant.