More Democrat meddling in business. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner, after 20 months of flight tests and certification by the FAA, is ready to make it’s first commercial flight on October 26th. Now three Democrat representatives have sic’d the Government Accounting Office on Boeing.
This post was last modified on October 21, 2011
View Comments (7)
Government seems to think that they know better and that it is up to them to decide when someone has enough, and how the rest should go to government.
I saw on FOX that the mayor (?) of the town where Jack Daniels is made wants Jack Daniels, Inc. to pay MORE taxes because they have so much money due to the messes (and other stupidity) that he says comes along with the tourists that come and visit the plant.
B*tch don't realize that the tourists bring CASH money to the town, that JD employees the town's citizens which means they spend CASH money in taxes for the town and in goods. Without the factory no one would give a crap for that town. Fool probably went into the company hand outstretched asking for donations and was probably denied. He thinks that JD will NOT move, like JD has no other options? Shoo JD can move to France or another country where they have suitable facilities and water. These people make me sick.
They need the local water to make the taste right. I can see it now. Tankers hauling creek water from US to France! FTW!
What? It's ready to go! NO NO NO!! Those were supposed to be size 000 rivets in those wing flaps instead of 00. Tear everything apart and start all over. NEXT! And don't you fergit dis isa UNION gubment contract.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-20/boeing-should-move-2nd-787-line-to-washington-u-s-board-says.html . The union is driving this issue. They want to control Boeing and how they chose to conduct their business.
Ooops, choose not chose
Apparently Boeing hasn't paid enough of this administrations licensing/approval fees (kickbacks) yet.
I'm sure the GAO has been tasked to find something these jokers can whine and cry about.
Gosh gee, it's not like there's any reason a failing administration would take potshots at a successful private enterprise just because it had some issues with some of that administration's #1 flunkies, is it?