Climate fund seeks UN-style diplomatic immunity. The Green Climate Fund is seeking a broad blanket of UN-style immunity that would shield its operations from any kind of legal process, including civil and criminal prosecution, in the countries where it operates. And just why would they want that, one wonders?
View Comments (6)
Interesting... Seems to me that they don't want to pay either in civil or criminal court of any consequences of their hinky science. That is actually wrong and it should not happen. If people lost jobs due to their methods or anything like that, they should be held accountable.
When the green climate fund ask for immunity, we need to immediately investigate and prosecute...You know they are dirty. Why else would they ask for immunity?
You whining brats. This is for our own good. Bend over and take it.
L.B.J. said of the "Gulf of Tonkin" resolution that got the U.S. sucked into Viet Nam: "It's like granny's bloomers, it covers everything".
Beware of any government wanting "Carte Blanch" for anything.
don't blame lbj for sucking us into Viet Nam. it was that scum sucking jfk did that: In 1961, Kennedy agreed that America should finance an increase in the size of the South Vietnamese Army from 150,000 to 170,000. He also agreed that an extra 1000 US military advisors should be sent to South Vietnam to help train the South Vietnamese Army. Both of these decisions were not made public as they broke the agreements made at the 1954 Geneva Agreement.
also. as far as I know, Viet Nam wasn't pronounced a war until years after it was over. It was a "police action" hence not covered by rules of war.
Well, I think anybody stupid enough to give them the blanket immunity they seek is gullible enough not to find out why they wanted it in the first place.