CNN ‘terminates’ Kathy Griffin’s hosting duties on New Year’s Eve program. Good for them. This is a classic use of throwing the left’s tactics of screaming, bitching and moaning back at them. Über-douche Al Franken is still planning on appearing with her later in the year.
This post was last modified on May 31, 2017
View Comments (23)
Let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
I see she also lost her endorsement deal with Squatty Potty, a company that makes footstools for toilets:
http://nypost.com/2017/05/31/kathy-griffin-loses-endorsement-deal-over-beheaded-trump-pic/
That's bound to be a drain on her finances...
She deserves to be flushed.
She was probably doing a shitty job anyway.
Ah crap, here we go again!
I'm sewer I don't know what you mean.
Dang, everything I can think of stinks
Sure you do. You're very ef fluent in puneese...
That's because I've logged a lot of hours of practice.
At times it still gets hard.
It might get hard but it's not something you can a void.
Just gotta push through.
Knowing it'll be a load off your mind when it's through.
I wonder if they took her Squatty Potty Away?She deserves to loose everything and end up living under a freeway Overpass with Amy Schumer...
If we can move her into the under the bridge category, I'd say let her keep the Squatty.
Maybe now she can go live in Keith Olbermann's basement and help him lead 'The Resistance".
Keith has better taste then Griffin. He was banging Katy Tur at one time, not sure if they are still together.
Über-douche Al Franken is probably going to take over this gig from her.
Over the hill, untalented, unemployed...
all of those are prerequisites for The View
"all of those are prerequisites for The View"
Trickie, nice one. Well done and take a bow.
Under the table...
What cracks me up about this entire stupid thing is how Griffin is portrayed as somehow deciding to do this on her own, on some kind of whim. And that this whim was a poor choice, in retrospect, which is why she subsequently made a public apology.
Sorry, but I don't believe any of that. Are we to accept that she simply went to the photog, even if they were already acquainted, and made a silly arrangement to do a photo shoot? Like, she hired him? Let's see the 1099 for that. Or, perhaps they made a trade... but for what? For her to send over her landscaper for a week? I mean, these people don't need anything they already don't have.
So, either they made a personal deal for some strange exchange of favors or there was a planned and signed contract by her managers/agents, publicists, lawyers, and herself, and the same at the photog's end, as well. And someone had to sponsor it -- again, either for a sum of money (such as TMZ) or for an eccentric exchange of favors.
These celebrities don't do anything on their own. They don't even go to the bathroom by themselves.