Duke Researcher Shows Cars are 80% Risker Than Guns. All you have to do is drive in the local shopping center to see that.
This post was last modified on February 11, 2021
Duke Researcher Shows Cars are 80% Risker Than Guns. All you have to do is drive in the local shopping center to see that.
This post was last modified on February 11, 2021
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (19)
Guns also produce minimal pollution. Notice that Dem strongholds DON'T have so many drivers. They use drivers, taxis, busses, subways, the El. They KNOW they can't drive!
They also don't plan well. There's noplace to park.
Time for the left to learn a cadence. Left, right, left, in other words walking their asses everywhere they go. They then could enjoy texting and not paying attention while walking and all fall down.
The only go left....
It's sad really, kill someone with a gun, you get life in prison, kill someone with a car, you get probation.
Just look at the situation with Ain't Bruce, and the woman that he killed with his car. At most, he'll be charged with a misdemeanor, and do NO jail time.
Ain't Bruce anymore will blame Hormones......It will become a new defense for killing someone while driving...Hormone Imbalance..Oh that and I dropped my lipstick......
Particularly if you were drunk at the time.
You want to see some danger drive across the Navajo reservation on a Friday or Saturday night. I would rather face someone with a gun than I would a drunk Navajo behind the wheel of a pickup.
I'm not sure that is true in certain areas of Chicago and Detroit.
It would if cars are considered an accomplice in drive by shootings.
No, but the gun would be charged as the perpetrator.
Soooo, we have to stop global warming or Eskimos will have to trade in dog sleds for cars, and that will cause more deaths....
The counter argument is that cars are used far more often than guns. The counter-counter argument would be to look at the number of rounds shot per year and how many of those accidently kill people.
Cars would not be so dangerous if we kept them out of the hands of drunks, teenagers, the elderly, and all the do everything but drive people. It's not the cars that are dangerous just as it's not the guns that are dangerous although many have been brainwashed to think so. Would you take cars away from everyone but the irresponsible? Once guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns.
One big difference between cars and guns - cars aren't mentioned in the Constitution.
Ban Cars!!!!!! The ONLY solution... The Amish have it right although of course horses losing their minds and trampling over people happened a lot when horses where the modes of transportation back in the day... heck... people are fat we should just walk or bicycle....
I used to work at a place where one of the executives was so fat that she would park right in front of the entry door, in the no parking zone, so she wouldn't have to walk so far. I joked that she should park in her driveway and walk to work.
Especially when demotards are driving, Hillary has driven since what 1996? And that stupid twit in DC was trying to park and kept ramming the car next to her trying to park. Like I said before, democrats are too stupid to own weapons or even handle them and are also way to stupid to drive...And I can base that on the bumper stickers of the idiots involved in accidents I have investigated over the years. The party most at fault? Demotards....
If you see one with Cal Berkeley stickers or plate frame watch out. I don't think anyone who graduated from there can drive.