Fat black people? Fat Hispanic people?

FatAlbert.jpg


Fat black people? Fat Hispanic people? It’s your fault, Whitey – they’re fat because of your racist microaggressions.

This post was last modified on March 21, 2021

J.P. Travis: Born and raised in Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1976 graduate of University of Michigan, father, grandfather, husband, founder and CEO of Travelyn Publishing (http://www.travelynpublishing.com/), and passionate anti-government believer in individual liberty.

View Comments (53)

      • Hence they are going to do it or at least try.

        Q: Will you shoot your fellow americans?
        R: Will? I already have!

        Hopefully this would mean that the Constitutionalist Rebels gets most of the decent and good officers and the Statists gets a majority of bad ones.

  • OK, then who's responsible for all the fat hispanic people in Mexico?
    Who's responsible for all the fat black people in Haiti and elsewhere on Earth?
    Are we to blame for everyone?
    If we are to blame, doesn't the blame fall on our leader?

    OMG!!!
    IT'S OBAMA'S FAULT!!!!
    Somebody play the Hallelujah Chorus!
    Let the clouds part and rays of light stream toward Earth!
    It’s finally OBAMA’S FAULT!!!!

  • Is their anything these liberal moonbeams won't blame on the Caucasians? And this from a class of people who inject cement and fix-a-flat in their asses to make them even bigger.

  • They are fat due to their unhealthy life style. They are morbidly obese from them living off junk found and alcohol. On top of that, I've not seen a white person with a weapon to their heads telling them to eat that triple decker hamburger, large fries and diet drink.

        • There are now several people in here that have pop up and are creating racial issues that I find very suspect and I think those and their friends are lurking the site. It is pathetic.

          • Just take the thumbs down as a badge of honor, you tell the truth and speak your mind like most of us here....Somewhere out their in mommy's basement is a libtard who does nothing but thumb down people...but they will never post anything here because most of the posters here (not me) are smarter than a whip and can turn the argument into a massacre like the little big horn.....:)

    • Kimmy it is the Obama team trying to divide all of us. blacks and whites. Poor and middle class. Middle class and rich. The man has set class and race relations back 70 years. All of this is to hide the true intentions of the progressives of making a two tier system of .05 to 99.95 elite to plebes. We merely point it out for the stupid voters.

      • Are we helping and this is a question for all of you... by continuing the debate race issues instead of concentrating on what really matters? Like the economy and foreign policies, etc. It is true that Obama and his ilk are at fault for the new racial paradigm, but I can't help to feel that by continuing to bring race up even to showcase liberal hypocrisy, we are helping him... That is something that I don't feel right about.

        • What is the alternative to talking about it? If we sit back and let Obama, Holder, Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton patrol the country labeling white people racist in every single particular of our existence - even in "microaggressions" which we apparently can't even control, it's just inherent in who we are - then we let them Balkanize the nation and fill everybody with hate. Talking about the Trayvon Martin case on the Internet, which I did and lots of other people did, enabled common sense to stop the state of Florida from railroading Zimmerman into a murder conviction. Now they seem to be railroading another white man, a police officer, just for the sake of misdirecting national attention away from the president's failures. Do we sit back and refuse to participate? Or do we keep drawing attention to what's really happening in Ferguson?

          I'm sorry it's awkward for you. It's awkward for me, too (as DRB probably knows since she seems to know everything about me). But we cannot allow the bad people to dominate the conversation. We cannot let them assert the silly notion that everything a white person does is racist and everything a black person does is cool, so a black thug who robs a party store and slugs a cop should never suffer a consequence. Where are we as a nation after that?

          I know what you mean about some comments crossing the line. Some of them make me squirm but I am always heartened when I see regulars step up and indict such comments. On the Internet, you either have to live with a certain amount of lowlife inflammatory crap in the comment section or you have to censor.

          • I am advocate for the truth whenever a lie comes up. However I feel that a lot of places from the far left to the far right of the political spectrum ACTIVELY search out race stories in order to either incite race wars or to propagate racial bias. I just have to wonder if that only helps Obama and his ilk?

            Example: Conservative/Libertarian sites/people continues to pump stories about (I agree to be detestable) crimes Blacks do against Whites and the slant is: They are animals who can't control themselves and lack leadership skills. They are welfare bums who are leeching of us. The reason we are doing this story is to PROVE that it is not US that is the problem it is THEM. No, no... this story does NOT make us racists, we are just saying that every time "they" come up with stories about racism and a White person killing a Black person, WE have to defend OURSELVES by putting up the MANY instances that Blacks commit crimes against Whites.

            Even Bill Whittle did something along those lines recently.

            I agree that this is a problem and we need to refute the lies whenever they come up on the national and regional stage, not sure that we are helping our cause though.

            Bill O'Reilly says all the time: "You can't defend bad behavior by pointing out OTHER bad behavior."

            For example: A liberal loon says well not ALL Muslims are bad AND Christians did it too back in the Crusades or the Witch trials in Salem. As in, well no one is perfect and OTHERS did it too, so I guess (?) the fact that Muslims are doing it now makes it okay (?) or acceptable (?).

            You know what I mean? Yes let's truly discuss it when lies are being told or extremes are being made in the name of race. I just don't know that bringing up the... well THEY are dangerous and THEY are doing it too is a good idea. It seems to me it helps liberals. All they had to do is go to those sites and look around and say: "See? They are racists!" So the result is the exact opposite of what it is intended.

            We know the practical reasons why this is happening. We know who to really blame. The YWH believers among us know the spiritual reasons why this is happening and we know who to truly blame. Why can't we have THOSE discussions? In this site, sometimes we do, but in many other sites there is no discussion of the REAL problem.

          • Well laid out, good information.

            You speak to talking about looking at these things spiritually, and while I am inclined to agree, how do you make those with a different religion or even those who are atheist enter into a conversation on the same terms? I can have a debate or a conversation with someone that I do not agree without getting angry, but I generally find the other guy resorting to personal attacks to bait me. Those people do not wish to listen, and how do you expect or propose to deal with those?

            Also, just to help your argument:
            "They are welfare bums who are leeching of us":
            http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/

            Fairly comparable percents by race.

          • People of no religion of different religions just have to find their own way to have that discussion. I cannot help them there. That is why I specifically mentioned YWH believers. Those of us that are can have those discussion among ourselves and that may help others, others may join in or not. That is their choice. However, there are practical reasons as well that may have nothing to do with religion or spiritual manners and all can discuss those just fine.

            If a person uses ad hominem (sp?) attacks right after you have exposed a truthful, factual, intelligent and irrefutable stance as to the state of the situation at hand, that person is not worth ANY MORE of your time and that person can leave your presence or you can leave hers or his presence and not even think of that person again. I believe (and it is a spiritual notion) that people leave seeds inside of you. Good and bad seeds. It up to you to take out the bad seeds and leave the good seeds in, but it takes a lot of introspection, self analysis and truthful and forceful application of moral and ethical grounds. You can ONLY control yourself and even in some cases some people fail to do that, but all in all the only person that you can TRULY have ANY true control of is yourself. So what others do or don't do in the end can only affect you (for good or bad) if you let it. It comes down to choice. Now... going back to your question... you left as far as you were able to, GOOD seeds in that person that is your job and you have to do it well and even if you get tired, you must do it why? because I am guessing you want to be a good human being. It is up to that person to decide to leave those good seeds in them or pluck them out. There is nothing you can do about that.

            If a person decides that your seeds are not worth germinating inside of them then leave them the hell alone. Don't let them put BAD seeds into you and if they do then pluck those out and leave him or her be. If he or she continues to place themselves in your presence you can do as you wish: ignore them, press charges, leave the area/community or give them what what... I tend to give them the what what... I have no respect for the fool as the fool as made himself known to me, so I have no reason to avoid letting them know how foolish they are at every opportunity that THEY put themselves in my presence... I NEVER actively search out these people... never.

            Your link: White and Blacks are pretty much neck in neck with the use of welfare. I predict that Hispanics will win over Blacks on welfare use within ten to 15 years. At the very very least come neck to neck.

          • Well said, JP. We can never allow only one POV to dominate the conversation nor should we condone those on "our side" who crawl into the rhetorical gutter with the progressives. All of us need to be reminded that we can make strong points without giving into the temptation to match every ad hominem attack the left uses against us.

          • I agree 100 and million percent with SK as always.

            I am totally into that. Yes we SHOULD always speak the anti political correctness truth AND we should not act like the bastards because it only helps THEIR CAUSE and it does nothing to help us in the end.

            My Mom says things like wrong and strong... in this case is right and wrong. Yes we are right, BUT by as you say crawling into the gutter, we are going about proving we are right, the wrong way and only in the end, proving to the left that we are what they say we are.

            What is the solution? Speak the truth whenever lies come around. My only gripe is the actual time taken to actively SEARCH for racial stories to prove the point that we are right about. The left does that... actively searches stories of racial bias to prove their point. We shouldn't use that tactic is my opinion.

      • All the sites for that matter. On Twitter and on G+ and everywhere there are so many race related stories. It is very bizarre!

        • Maybe it's because race is where the president turns whenever his presidency is floundering. Henry Gates, Trayvon Martin, now Michael Brown. Things were very bleak in D.C., the president looking like an idiot on so many issues, so this Ferguson race issue was manufactured and Obama quickly sends Holder over to Missouri to draw it out and keep it in the news as long as possible. Everything is about race lately - it's like someone is purposely stirring things up to create racial divides. Which means we should ask: who stands to benefit the most if everybody is riled up about race?

          • So if Hillary gets elected we will see discrimination on women, assaults on women, etc constantly in the news? National level issues when a man hits his wife?

            Just make sure they aren't a black couple.

            Oh wait, Ray Rice. Riiiiight...

          • He promised to be the post racial President that one and his other promises stood for crap.

            I seriously don't remember all this race talk during Bush's years. BARELY talk about "good" Muslims being afraid and blah blah blah every now and then... nothing to this extreme.

          • You mean "It's OBAMA'S FAULT"?
            Somebody play the Hallelujah Chorus!
            Let the clouds part and rays of light stream toward Earth!
            It's finally OBAMA'S FAULT!!!!

  • Well I'll be damned! Now I am responsible for welfare loafers overeating? Next time I see one I am going right up to them and say, "I am sorry your really, really fat".....that should make it alright huh?
    For the love of God I can not believe the serious amount of bullshit flying out of "places of lower learning".....

Related Post
  1. DALLAS POLICE SHOOTING: ‘ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE ASSAULT VEHICLE AND TROOP TRANSPORT’
  2. Kim Jong-un was a child prodigy
  3. Top GOP Leader Promises Total Amnesty In 2015