Former Christian school teacher accused of having sex with student for over a year while her father, her uncle, and former principal all covered it up. Another perverted teacher abusing children and another cover-up. The events of late make us wonder if the teaching profession is really just a good place for pedophiles to hang out.


View Comments (46)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS1NWYV1i_E&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MjRV-UTs9o&feature=related
Jon stewart is the man! He proves Fox News sucks at lying!!
-Brian Lamb of C-Span
-U.S. News & World Report
-Newsweek
-60 Minutes
Best:
-"NewsHour With Jim Lehrer."
-CNN's "NewsNight With Aaron Brown"
-ABC's "Good Morning America"
-The American Independent News Network
Fox News' "Special Report With Brit Hume" (oh wow I included fox news!)
- the Drudge Report
Newsweek is fair and unbiased?! The magazine which puts unflattering pictures of conservative women on their cover. 60 Minutes?! Aaron Brown and Jim Lehrer are liberal. "Good Morning America" is liberal. U.S. News & World Report is liberal.
Most 3 letter acronym New stations are extremely bias
and yet you cite only 1 3 letter acronym news station. you're woefully unprepared to defend your own statement.
as far as being independant, maybe you did vote for nader, but that doesn't make you independant. had you voted for ross perot, that would make a difference in your credibility, though you don't mention this, and i suspect you didn't, it's proof you're less independent than you'd have us believe and, indeed a leftist slow-thinking(if at all) voter.
again. you're stupid, added to that you're trying to lie you way out of the corner into which you painted yourself. therefore a logical person, such as myself, refutes anything you have to say by merely repeating the axiom "you're a liar, and the truth is far from you." NOW i will allow MDLion, whom i consider very wise and smart, to field further comments which you might have the unmitigated gall to post.
If he voted for Nader, that just makes him stupid.
yep!
Repeating "you're a liar" is a coward way to leave a conversation especially when you do not even comment on any of the sources I posted. Looks like you did indeed get overwhelmed!!
Actually most of the sources in my last post are not 1-3 letter acronyms. Way to go moron.
How the hell can you call yourself logical when indeed you have; trouble counting, accuse me of being independent when i stated clearly I'm libertarian and leave the conversation without addressing any of my previous points directly.
To be extremely honest I don't mind if MDLION takes over. While I do disagree with many things he says I actually have respect for his character and his rationale.
ok, how about you're a stupid liar. you're the one who posted you could name 3 letter news providers, and yet you didn't. also, the fact i'm responding to this gives the lie to your assumption that i'm running away. You still haven't made your original point, i reckon it's because you're unable too. Furthermore; why should I waste my time on refuting obvious lies?
I have no need, nor desire, for respect from such as you. I'm fully aware of my own abilities and foibles and still have self-respect.
You do make a point in your assertion of your own political stance re: libertarian. and for assuming you're an independent, I was indeed wrong. and for this i ask you to forgive me.
I thought you are DONE with this conversation?
My only point is that the sources I posted are sources that I believe or the most unbiased (though that is impossible to be completely unbiased).
I do not have any anger towards you but instead I have pity and concern for you.
I do forgive you though I do not forgive your raping of the English language. Maybe you are tired and not thinking clearly since it is past your bedtime? Afterall 12 year olds usually sleep around 9pm.
i beg to differ with you. but only for the moment. You're the one who suggeseted 3 letter acronymic newslets werer unbiased, and then were unable to cite specific references.
Your previous comments directed at me demanded I rebutt such.
Indeed your only hope for winning this "debate" is that i will quit pointing out your lies and "it is never impossible to be unbiased." all it really takes is a firm resolve to be unbiased. but your own citations are truly less than unbiased, which, was your initial statement. If you believe that i'm merely a 12 year old, then your statements are even more ridiculous. Why? because a 12 year old would not be able to logically refute your "illustrious" statements. Indeed, a well informed 12 year old would be able to advance astute arguments against your suppositions.
The fact of the matter is, I only respond textually rather than merely down thumbing your ignorance, provides proof that i read (be it past tense now) your posts and found them wanting of any real value.
having said that, and thoroughly refuting your stupid (yes i said stupid) allegations i respond now because you assumed that I was altogether to young to engage you in meaningful dialogue. The truth is obvious, just as your inability to engage in actual political discourse is obvious. You are not worth my time. And i know you'll use this statement as a soapbox, but frankly, from this point forward, I don't care what you have to say, as your previous statements show you're nothing less than an obfuscater of the highest degree. In short, my supposition that you're a Liar is proven by all your statements thus far.
I'm surprised this was posted on this website. Usually you guys HIDE news articles that makes you guys look like hypocrites.
You must have us confused with the 90% of the media who hide the pasts of Obama and Clinton.
Most 3 letter acronym New stations are extremely bias (eve FOX news as well). I find it ironic that this website's mission is to point out the biases in the media. There are far more fair websites out there that don't have this type of mission.
A former poster here, David Bishop, made one educated post asking questions and making points to a famous liberal website. Within a half an hour his post was scrubbed and his e-mail blocked. You'll have to go sell that somewhere else, John, the idea that this site is so unfair while other sites are so open to diverse opinions.
I don't want you two to go into complete shock so I will just post few websites for now:
http://www.pbs.org/
http://www.usatoday.com/
http://www.politifact.com/
BTW do you know which website David Bishop posted at?
as md said, pbs, liberal, usa today liberal, and i might add usa today virulently liberal.
I do look into politifact often and have found amazing information there. but for the most part they concentrate on facts the conservatives find disconcerting, while displaying few disconcerting facts about the left.
so you're still only showing 1 case of near unbias.
come on you can do better. and i guarantee you that I'll check, or know about, any site you wish to publish. so don't be concerned that you'll overwhelm my ability to think.
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/sheldon-whitehouse/
I just thought it'd be amusing if this dude ran for president
PBS, Liberal. USA TODAY, Liberal. I opened the politifact and the first six things I saw were fact checks of Republican candidates and organizations. Sounds fair. David Bishop hasn't been here in months but I remember him making a post about having his post and e-mail scrubbed from a big liberal website the first time he made one. I guess you won't believe me because you've been trained to think: Conservatives unfair, liberals tolerant.
PBS is liberal? Come on MDLION.
I will admit politifact is a great website. My conservative friends love it as well.
Actually I consider myself a libertarian. I also check news from this site, reddit and PBS. Surprise?
Seriously now. If John doesn't see the liberal bias at PBS, we're not going to be able to teach him anything. Thumb down, move on.
Goodness, you think PBS isn't liberal? Bill Moyers had Obama's pastor Jeremiah Wright sitting right in front of him and tossed him softballs. The questions he could have asked Wright and he wouldn't.
@MD you're more than well equipped to handle this discussion. so i'm a gonna sit back and enjoy your trouncing of this libfool. :)
"far more" ok, now's your chance to start naming names and providing citation for your opinion. I won't wait, because you're going to be a long long while collecting any. better bring a sack lunch and an oil lantern. oops, i meant a solar charged lighting element.
Yowser! Hot-for-teacher 32yrs/young roadhead...she looks real nasty.
The nastier, the hotter. Bet she's real kinky too. Most church girls I met were.
WOW, a years worth of poon.
She's attractive. She will get a slap on the wrist. It's Mary Kay LeTourneau all over again, just in a different place.
SICK bastards all!!!. They need to be castrated all three. What father would cover this up?
I bet that teenager thought he had went to heaven. Seriously, most 16 YO boys would jump at that opportunity. I'm not saying I approve of it but facts are facts.
Oh the libs will love this...
NOW they'll be "outraged"
From what I've read elsewhere, students still have a greater chane of being abused by a PUBLIC school teacher than anyone else. At least maybe this will shut up the Bible-thumpers whose hobby is sh1tting on Rome.
Oh wait, a BOY student? In that case it's just comedy material, not a crime against humanity.
Just this past week, A lovely teacher who works at a local high school here in Kalifornia got put on admin leave because she was operating a couple websites from the school, you'll love this, "myslutteyteacher.com" and "teachertitties.com"....Yea we have some winners in public schools too....She was having an affair, her soon to be exhusband found out about it and blew the whistle....I bet the Kalifornia Teachers Association is going to make here teacher of the year...
Damn. The link doesnt work.
Yea they took them down this weekend..sorry I shoulda mentioned that..I guess the school district got miffed cause it was there server...and they weren't gonna get a share of the profit.
miffed, or muffed?
Miffed, pissed that kind of miffed, Muffed is a whole different thing...hehe
Ugh...men!
I admit drb, at times my childlike sense of humor takes total control and I revert or is it pervert back to potty jokes....oh hell, who am I kidding, I never grew up...:) Its a guy thing, we come with a stupid gene in our DNA....
Finally, somebody that understands me.
lol, come on now...you know I wouldn't want to have it any other way.
I have to admit to the opposite, NotSo. On rare occasion, my childlike sense of humor steps back and I'm not a pervert, laughing at potty jokes. It lasts a few minutes, then I'm back to myself again.
oh wiseguy eh? LOL
i dig.