Global Warming Scientist To Be Cross-examined Under Oath [2nd Amendment Texan]

Global Warming Scientist To Be Cross-examined Under Oath [2nd Amendment Texan]. Looks like Mann finally stepped in it. We hope he enjoys being on the global warming hot seat.

This post was last modified on January 31, 2021

CO2Insanity: Tired of the CO2 BS and all the other BS in the US and the world.

View Comments (15)

    • There's an agenda to be pursued and revenue flow to be established via taxes and politically connected "green" industries and they aren't going to let anything get in the way- including truth and real science- whose purveyors can expect to be marginalized and to be the subjects of investigations- including IRS audits. Whether there's merit to the suit filed against Steyn, The National Review, et al is immaterial... by keeping a possible series of litigation alive the notion that AGW doubters are incorrect- to the point of expressing skepticism against the agenda being a criminally chargeable offense is impressed on a consensus of voters who have shown that they can be quite effectively led a good distance from logic as evidenced by a number of recent election cycles here.

      If things begin to unfold inconveniently for the AGW snake oil salesmen then someone'll just buy Justin Bieber a double shot of cheap whiskey and a beer chaser then wait for the ensuing headline distractions to write themselves.

  • Glowing BULL warm mongering. The smart money is on the MSM completely burying this if not somehow spinning it to abet the hoax.

  • Saw this posted in the comments section of a "Global Warming" story...

    CLIMATE CHANGE GLOSSARY
    PEER REVIEW: The act of banding together a group of like-minded academics with a funding conflict of interest, for the purpose of squeezing out any research voices that threaten the multi-million dollar government grant gravy train.
    SETTLED SCIENCE: Betrayal of the scientific method for politics or money or both.
    DENIER: Anyone who suspects the truth.
    CLIMATE CHANGE: What has been happening for billions of years, but should now be flogged to produce ‘panic for profit.’
    NOBEL PEACE PRIZE: Leftist Nutcase Prize, unrelated to “Peace” in any meaningful way.
    DATA, EVIDENCE: Unnecessary details. If anyone asks for this, see “DENIER,” above.
    CLIMATE SCIENTIST: A person skilled in spouting obscure, scientific-sounding jargon that has the effect of deflecting requests for “DATA” by “DENIERS.” Also skilled at affecting an aura of “Smartest Person in the Room” to buffalo gullible legislators and journalists.
    JUNK SCIENCE: The use of invalid scientific evidence resulting in findings of causation which simply cannot be justified or understood from the standpoint of the current state of credible scientific knowledge.

    ..totally true.

  • Reminds me of the Oscar Wilde case. A man sent a letter to Wilde's club addressed to "Oscar Wilde, corrupter of young boys," and Wilde put up a public snit. If he'd let it drop, life would have gone on. Instead, he sued, and it came out in court that, yes, he was indeed a corrupter of young boys. Wilde went to prison.

    Now, God willing, maybe we'll see a corrupter of science being torn down!