Global Warming Scientist To Be Cross-examined Under Oath [2nd Amendment Texan]. Looks like Mann finally stepped in it. We hope he enjoys being on the global warming hot seat.
This post was last modified on January 31, 2021
Global Warming Scientist To Be Cross-examined Under Oath [2nd Amendment Texan]. Looks like Mann finally stepped in it. We hope he enjoys being on the global warming hot seat.
This post was last modified on January 31, 2021
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (15)
Seriously? This idiot filed a lawsuit against Mark Steyn?
He'll be crushed!
There's a word for people like this, but I'll just use sissies and leave it at that
"Last year the Best Science or Technology Weblog category was dominated entirely by climate science blogs, and 4 of the 5 were skeptics...
This year, the bloggies has quietly announced "Best Science or Technology Weblog has been discontinued".
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/a-bloggies-awar.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
how conwenient.
There's an agenda to be pursued and revenue flow to be established via taxes and politically connected "green" industries and they aren't going to let anything get in the way- including truth and real science- whose purveyors can expect to be marginalized and to be the subjects of investigations- including IRS audits. Whether there's merit to the suit filed against Steyn, The National Review, et al is immaterial... by keeping a possible series of litigation alive the notion that AGW doubters are incorrect- to the point of expressing skepticism against the agenda being a criminally chargeable offense is impressed on a consensus of voters who have shown that they can be quite effectively led a good distance from logic as evidenced by a number of recent election cycles here.
If things begin to unfold inconveniently for the AGW snake oil salesmen then someone'll just buy Justin Bieber a double shot of cheap whiskey and a beer chaser then wait for the ensuing headline distractions to write themselves.
Glowing BULL warm mongering. The smart money is on the MSM completely burying this if not somehow spinning it to abet the hoax.
http://swiss100canada.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/292056_2407380872582_10696494_n-copy.jpg
I like that... quite emblematic.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/29/bill-nye-warns-that-population-growth-is-driving-global-warming/
Y'know, wouldn't surprise me if old George "Nazi collaborator" Soros is thinkin' "I love it when a plan comes together." Cuz obviously with sighents like this the ACA death panels will be more easily swallowed. Not to mention, though I will, the climate control efforts that have been going on since Planned Parenthood got into the whole enviro-cleaning business. One is forcibly confronted with the realization that the principalities, powers, the rulers of the darkness of this world, and the spiritually wicked in high places are all in this together.
10 bucks says he takes the 5th.
20 bucks says he does not recall at least 10 times.
Or drinks one.
Saw this posted in the comments section of a "Global Warming" story...
CLIMATE CHANGE GLOSSARY
PEER REVIEW: The act of banding together a group of like-minded academics with a funding conflict of interest, for the purpose of squeezing out any research voices that threaten the multi-million dollar government grant gravy train.
SETTLED SCIENCE: Betrayal of the scientific method for politics or money or both.
DENIER: Anyone who suspects the truth.
CLIMATE CHANGE: What has been happening for billions of years, but should now be flogged to produce ‘panic for profit.’
NOBEL PEACE PRIZE: Leftist Nutcase Prize, unrelated to “Peace” in any meaningful way.
DATA, EVIDENCE: Unnecessary details. If anyone asks for this, see “DENIER,” above.
CLIMATE SCIENTIST: A person skilled in spouting obscure, scientific-sounding jargon that has the effect of deflecting requests for “DATA” by “DENIERS.” Also skilled at affecting an aura of “Smartest Person in the Room” to buffalo gullible legislators and journalists.
JUNK SCIENCE: The use of invalid scientific evidence resulting in findings of causation which simply cannot be justified or understood from the standpoint of the current state of credible scientific knowledge.
..totally true.
Pee r review, squeezing out
MM just does not know when to shut mouth and engage brain.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2014/01/the_inventor_of_the_global_warming_hockey_stick_doubles_down.html at January 21, 2014 - 11:54:57 AM CST
Reminds me of the Oscar Wilde case. A man sent a letter to Wilde's club addressed to "Oscar Wilde, corrupter of young boys," and Wilde put up a public snit. If he'd let it drop, life would have gone on. Instead, he sued, and it came out in court that, yes, he was indeed a corrupter of young boys. Wilde went to prison.
Now, God willing, maybe we'll see a corrupter of science being torn down!