High school textbook changes 2nd Amendment

View Comments (49)

• You're not censored here, John, anyone can open your posts which get voted down. If you truly want to be censored, go to many liberal sites and state a conservative opinion. And then when your account is "deleted", come over and tell us about censorship. You might be surprised at what happens if you expand beyond Paul Censored/Corporate Greed. Why don't you give us your opinion on Rand Paul? Ron is retired. He's done.

  • I think I posted once at a well-known liberal site. Then a year later I tried to post again and discovered I was blocked.

    • I did something like that once, I'm pretty sure that my post was removed before 3 people saw it.

    • Not particularly surprising since my observation has been that while liberals love to loudly accuse others of censorship it is actually far more widely practiced by them.

• And you are trying to change the 1st Amendment by censoring me here. (The safelink thread and CO2's threads being two examples).

  • You are so stupid you clearly don't even understand what censorship is. You AREN'T censored here.

    • CO2 WAS censoring me by deleting my posts (he did stop and I thank him for that, even though his reason for doing so was purely technical). There's also the matter of what happened to all the comments on the Safelink thread.

      • We had a Safelink thread? Is that like a safe sex thread?

        • It's one of your 7 main links in the hotbar at the top of this site.

        • TURDS!! :-D

      • Again Crowley, no one cares about you, your posts or the fact that getting rejected sexual excites you....perhaps try Shitferbrains.com

      • No one cares. If you're unhappy here, there are lots of other sites you can visit.

        • Like retarded_welfare_scumbags.com

        • @PJ49

          ROFLMAO!

        • Yea, well I figured he knew about that site, he is their poster boy.

        • nah, that's victims-of-gold-theft.com

        • I got a turd!!!!!

        • roflmao

  • The First Amendment means the government can't censor you. This site isn't the government. We can't put you in jail for what you say here, but that doesn't mean we can't TD you. And we wouldn't want it any other way.

    • TDs are fine, but I've seen two examples of actual censorship here. CO2 deleting my posts and the deleted comments on the safelink thread.

      • Because we are tired of your inane stupidity.

        • Shut up, creepycrawly.

          And I refuse to look. I can't imagine anything relevant or even intelligent he'd have to say here.

          But yeah, libbies, the Second Amendment is all about guaranteeing the right of soldiers to carry guns.

          Sounds really stupid when you say it that way, doesn't it?

        • Quoted by Geoff B above:
          "The First Amendment means the government can’t censor you. This site isn’t the government."

          Sounds like a similar workaround that this textbook is using to include and exclude different groups from the Constitution.

        • Aaaaaannnnnnd, another big turd.

  • WE don't want to censor you, just put you in a nut hut where you belong..you know with people who hear voices and see aliens and shit...

    • Five people thumbed that up? Do we have an army of paid trolls here now? I hit him with the eighth TD, so I guess I can rest easy now.

      • That's kind of weird isn't it? If a comment is complaining about censorship and the comment is there for you to read then clearly it isn't being censored so the comment has proven itself stupid. So why would anybody give it a thumbs up?

        • There's much more chance of Crowley getting a thumbs up if the comment CAN'T be read.

• I see the authors in fine weaselly fashion left themselves an out. I can hear them now, " it says right at the top it's just a "summary". Yeah right, and the slant wasn't intentional either.

• The textbook didn't change the Constitution; rather, as your local Progressive would be glad to confirm, the "living, breathing" Constitution "evolved", just like the influenza virus does every year.

• That is just the tip of what Common Core is pushing through kids minds these days. It's sickening, riddled with so many agenda driven bias ideas, pushed through by lobbyist. Our kids minds are bought and paid for. One has to wonder how it got this bad, and where parents have been for years!

  • They've been purposefully polarized and frightened at the same time regarding true discipline of minor children and teens and they themselves have been brought up on this mother's milk of social unicorn farts crap that passes for parenting these days. In my day it was Dr. Benjamin McLane Spock, a self proclaimed Communist and pediatrician, who almost single handedly destroyed this nation with his communist manifesto gobbledygook. He and "Dr." Theodor "Seuss" Geisel, another fellow traveler, did great damage during the late 50's and early 60's; mostly with the help of the MSM of the time. And we wonder why we have so many problems now...it can be traced back to people such as these two esteemed asshats and others like Margaret Higgins Sanger and progressive fascist libtard, John Dewey and their adoring retinue in high minded, busy body society. I spit on them all! May they roast warmly, in Hell!

• Liberals, always changing history to suit their agenda. Any teacher with 1/2 a bit of intelligence would throw that book in the trash.

  • The question is, where to find a teacher with a single working brain cell?

    • Parents that care enough for their kids and home school :-/

    • Private schools.

  • Except, teachers are members of the NEA and are therefore leftists, and this fits their agenda.

    • Textbooks are not produced by teachers. These are national companies with a variety of educational levels in their employees.

• They did more than change the 2d Amendment. Look at the First. The AP study guide is paraphrasing the Bill of Rights to make it, I guess, easier to understand. Of course it isn't hard to understand the original but it is much easier to subvert it this way.

  • One question.
    Why do they need to dumb down AP course material?
    I thought AP courses were for the smarter students.

    Wait, I know why, INDOCTRINATION!

    • And that's the really scary part. The AP kids are usually smarter than the average bears, and are seen as the future movers and shakers in training. How come the Constitution and Bill of Rightsnot reproduced. EXACTLY AS WRITTEN? This also decreases discussion of the amendments, as the outcome is predetermined.

  • Here is more disinformation courtesy of The Blaze.

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/09/17/publisher-of-ap-history-book-containing-questionable-second-amendment-summary-has-direct-ties-to-common-core-and-theres-more/

    Has any lib or textbook publisher (like there is a difference) ever read the Heller decision that affirms that bearing arms is an individual right rather than a collective one?

    • Yes. They just can't talk about it.

  • There is no Separation of Church and State in the Constitution. So yes this is an attack pretty much on the primary rights. This is absolutely disgusting.

• Shows what little understanding educators have of the constitution, to them and Obammanites the constitution is just something that keeps getting in their way....Whoever wrote that needs to be flogged in public...

  • Have we checked to make sure that this wasn't changed by executive order over the weekend when we weren't looking?

  • They know what it actually says. Their fingers just couldn't type it, kinda like the Fonz from Happy days couldn't speak the word "wrong." Of course, Henry Winkler is amazingly wrong now.

• This should be considered criminally prosecutable.

  • HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
    Oh boy are you ever funny!