John Roberts: I … can’t help but think this decision opens the door to legal polygamy. Well, at least they’ll be able to get Obamacare for all their wives or husbands. Perhaps bisexuals will be able to have one of each? Who will be first to use this? CAIR or the Mormons? All questions that remain to be answered that perhaps were not considered by some on the Supreme Court.
This post was last modified on April 10, 2021
View Comments (21)
Robert seemed to be way to smart for any of the BS things he's done lately. Either he was badly compromised or it was the greatest bait & switch in modern political history.
All right! I could use some polygamy right about now. Two women to do everything I do for myself like cook, wash dishes, clean house, sweep, vacuum, change the bedding, wash my skivvies and scrub the toilet. What more could a man want! Double the pleasure, double the fun!
Then I think about all the hell I went through before my divorce. I think, oh shit! What if both of them hit menopause at the same time! That wouldn't be double the pleasure, that would be double the hell! So much for that idea, I think I'll just stay single.
Been there, done that. After enduring the psycho mood swings of a woman going through mental-pause for 10 years, I'm not ready to deal with that again!
The only reason it was named menopause is because mad cow disease was already taken.
I was told they forgot the 'n' for on in the middle.
And this, of course, means gay polygamy.
Tell me: If your church marries 5 men, are you still going to go to that church?
That would not longer be a church at least not a Christian church
Christians now must start to decide to cash out their businesses or stop services that gays will want them to perform. Christians will now have to rely on family and friends and themselves to their own services. Laura Ingraham stated it many months ago that Christians might be forced to create their own communities and have their own businesses and deal with one another mostly/solely like the Amish.
She is right, however what stops the government from deciding to Waco the Christian communities?
Roberts is finding out words do mean things after all. Wonder when the perverts will be asking for marriage certificates in order to marry their animals, vehicles or trees?
The fools in the robes are more dangerous than the cry baby or droopy eyes ever where. At least the RINOs can be voted out. Federal Judges are there until they drop dead.
I was also thinking about the animal lovers, but worse than that, since they used the 14th Amendment as justification for this ruling, what's to stop someone from marrying a 12 year old, or a 9 year old, or even an infant? After all, we wouldn't want anyone to be illegally deprived of life, liberty, or property.
I was just posting that on the other thread. If marriage is a right where do I go to get my now rightful husband that as a citizen I have a right to? Can I get take him from a woman that I think is not treating him right? If I can provide "proof" of her yelling at him once as a sign of mistreatment, maybe the government can award me my husband (force a divorce so I can get him). Or even if she is a good wife, but this is her second husband, that is sooo not fair I should get him because she had her chance, and the government can force her to go back to her first husband (especially if he wants her back). The government now must provide me with my husband... where he at?
Confusion does not even begin to qualify this mess.
A pedophile can easily make the case that as a citizen he has the RIGHT to a marriage to a person of his choosing which is a child. Perhaps, it would be too soon to force parents to participate by forcing parents to give up their children... but what about the children that are under state control? In orphanages and foster homes? They are fair game. In order to avoid paying for them, the state can decide to let them be with their pedophile spouses.
If anyone thinks this is too far fetched... it was too far fetched that gays would be this "out" in society to the point where the Supreme Court be doling out rights, instead of the rights coming from a Creator (meaning the State does not give out rights but protect those given to us by a Higher Power).
So now I want the right to be called Her Majesty the Fabulous One... why stops every clown from going to court now and demanding new rights?
John Roberts can GFHS! And he can KMA while he's at it. He needs to go on SCOTUSCare!
Franky, I think we'd be much better off with the other Roberts on the court.
[edit] fast & dirty
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/FoCOx0Q5HbomqlkKH-2Fvx2i5dsfQxfvuTh5KdpQwkU?feat=directlink
you're not just a sick so-and-so you're mean too.
I ain't so sure about that!
Roberts is concerned? Bullshit! He wasn't concerned yesterday in stomping on the constitution, why would he be concerned today? He is a moron.
John Roberts..."I can't help but think"......Bullshit if I ever heard it...He wasn't thinking yesterday.....
They want to get back to the world of Caligula.
...And they call right-wingers "backward"!
John Incitatus Kerry gallops to mind.
I salute you.
We should start referring to him as Pandora Roberts.
And moreover I saw under the sun the place of judgment, that wickedness was there; and the place of righteousness, that iniquity was there.