Judge awards graffiti artists $6.7M after their work is ‘wrongfully and willfully destroyed’ by a landlord to make space for luxury condos. So now graffiti is serious art? Yes the judge is yet another whackjob Clinton appointee.

Judge awards graffiti artists $6.7M after their work is ‘wrongfully and willfully destroyed’ by a landlord to make space for luxury condos. So now graffiti is serious art? Yes the judge is yet another whackjob Clinton appointee.
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (6)
That's art?? Looks like vandalism of private property to me.
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2q1YhRQ7Rqk/WoNhFMrQwsI/AAAAAAAAwls/T0UOnBx8KW0xMiudvb1-nu1n9mBKSmkvQCLcBGAs/s1600/DV7OOEwW0AINSUR.jpg
Oh hell no... this is insane... this is insanity insanity insane...
I bet an appeals court tells this Clintoon appointee to shove this judgement up his ass.
Here's a crazy idea: how about if you want your art to be permanent you paint on something that isn't owned by someone else?
"Visual Rights Act"? I fail to see how this restriction on property rights could be Constitutional, unless you are a Progressive who believes the U.S. Constitution was written in pencil.