Judge awards graffiti artists $6.7M after their work is ‘wrongfully and willfully destroyed’ by a landlord to make space for luxury condos. So now graffiti is serious art? Yes the judge is yet another whackjob Clinton appointee.

6
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
6 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
BMFKimmyQueenNot so silentJPTravisJoe Redfield Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
BMF
Member
BMF

That’s art?? Looks like vandalism of private property to me.

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent

comment image

KimmyQueen
Member

Oh hell no… this is insane… this is insanity insanity insane…

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent

I bet an appeals court tells this Clintoon appointee to shove this judgement up his ass.

JPTravis
Member

Here’s a crazy idea: how about if you want your art to be permanent you paint on something that isn’t owned by someone else?

Joe Redfield
Member
Joe Redfield

“Visual Rights Act”? I fail to see how this restriction on property rights could be Constitutional, unless you are a Progressive who believes the U.S. Constitution was written in pencil.