LA street artists hit Maxine Waters at her Hancock Park mansion

MaxineWaters_PovertyPimp.jpg


LA street artists hit Maxine Waters at her Hancock Park mansion. Hancock Park is outside the congressional district Waters represents in Congress but she lives there anyway. Because it’s nicer there, duh. Yes, this is illegal but, let’s face it, accusing a Democrat of doing something illegal is a futile exercise in redundancy.

This post was last modified on January 26, 2021

J.P. Travis: Born and raised in Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1976 graduate of University of Michigan, father, grandfather, husband, founder and CEO of Travelyn Publishing (http://www.travelynpublishing.com/), and passionate anti-government believer in individual liberty.

View Comments (23)

  • I hate to say anything positive about Mad Maxine but I must correct the erroneous assertion that it is illegal not to live in the district she represents. It is not illegal nor is it required that candidates for federal office live in the district they represent. State office holders are usually required to live in the district they represent, but FEDERAL office holders are NOT. There are 3 requirements to hold the office of Representative to Congress:
    1. You must be 25 years of age.
    2. You must be a U.S. Citizen for at least 7 years.
    3. You must reside in the STATE you represent on election day.
    That's IT. Shockingly low requirements but that's all that is required.
    For the US Senate you must be 30 and a citizen for 10 year and #3 rule
    also applies. There are no other requirements.

    • I did not know that. Thanks, Teri. So apparently it's merely tradition that congresscritters reside in the district they represent. This reminds me of the Brits, who were famous for buying and selling seats in Parliament, the seats often ending up with representatives who could barely find their district on a map. I recently read a biography of Edmund Burke who represented Bristol for quite a while and the book mentioned that he often went years without even visiting Bristol... much to the consternation of the merchants in Bristol who were paying his campaign expenses. Seems like a dysfunctional system to me.

      • JP, where some of the confusion may come in is within states. In Kalifornia, you have to live in the district you represent when your in the Kalifornia Assembly or Senate, on the national scene, you don't. I don't know about other states but a lot of them have "at large" voting. Where I grew up in North Dakota both senators and the House members are at large. So you could have two from the same city.

  • Old hag doesn't like the neighborhood that she's supposed to represent so she just moved. Thats a dim wit lying bitch for you. All the laws and rules apply to the little people and not her. Hey all you folks who are supposed to have Waters representing you. How does it feel to know that she looks down upon you and loathes you? She won't even live in the district that she's elected from. Only a dim wit and one from California can get by with this one. Even Jackson-Lee can't pull this one off and that is saying something.

  • I'm willing to bet the NAACP and the NBPP are looking for this guy, you can't diss one of their heroes like that.

      • It's NOT required that she live in the district. I know this because I did not live in the district I would have represented had I won the general election and had the pleasure of making my Democrat opponent look like a fool over it. When he pointed out I didn't live in the district, I was able to say that I was shocked that he did not know the requirements to hold the office he had been in for 22 year and embarrass him in front of the crowd. It is a common misconception along with the one that you get the salary for life after serving one term. You must serve 20 years to vest for a Congressional pension.