Lautenberg: Obama doesn’t have to convince voters they are better off since he became president

Lautenberg: Obama doesn’t have to convince voters they are better off since he became president. Asked if Obama could make the case to us that we are better off since he allowed us to serve him, Sen. Hackenberg gave a non-denail denial. Try it yourself: “Mr. President, do your proxies accuse your critics of raaaaacism to hide the fact you’re incompetent?” “They don’t need to!” See?

Bonfire of the Absurdities: After 35 year career writing software for IBM mainframes, am now self-employed contractor thinking of joining a union and striking for higher wages. Cured morbid fear of heights when I learned to look at them as lengths standing on end. Uncompromising in refusal to accept browser cookies. Amateur investor who has accumulated a small fortune in the market after starting out years ago with a large one. For recreation, I run, hike, kayak and play tennis but will not consider synchronized swimming under any circumstances.

View Comments (7)

  • No, "Dear Leader" has to convince voters he's not lying, and he'll do it if it takes every dollar we have.

  • Are you better off than four years ago and six trillion dollars in deficit spending?

    RACIST!!!!111!!!!eleventy

  • Actually, if Obama was a coach, he would have been fired & he would have been paid for the last year of his 4 year contract. Obama sucks, Lautenberg sucks, & those who support them suck.

  • Slight typo there.
    "Obama doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell to convince voters they are better off since he became president."
    There, fixed it up for them.