No Whites Allowed: Black Michael Brown Protesters Bar White People From Participating

View Comments (9)

• This came at a very opportune time. In my local "thrown in the driveway, free paper" there was an article written by a semi-retired doctor, exalting the protests, and claiming the people have "found their mojo" when it comes to protesting. Since I had this story as ammo, I felt compelled to write a letter to the editor:
  ---------------------
  I was amazed to see the ridiculous blather printed in the Dec 13th edition of The Suncoast News, on the "Opinion" and "Other Views" pages by supposedly educated people. I won't even go into the obvious ignoring of the Constitution by law professor James Wilets, by the way, I noticed that the 200 word limit was suspended for his letter, which seems odd considering he's not even a local resident, but the most ridiculous one was from Dr. Marc Yacht, and his joyous article about the recent anti police protests. His claim that these protesters are speaking unopposed is just plain dumb. Regardless of which side of this debate you fall on, the protesters themselves have gone out of their way to exclude participants based on race! In a recent "Die In" in support of Michael Brown in Missouri, the event organizers banned white people from participating in the "Die In", as reported in The College Fix. http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/20364/
  “During the demonstration we will hold a ‘die-in’ in the student center. We are asking that only people of color be the ones to do so,” event organizers stated in an email obtained by The College Fix.
  So much for the solidarity of the protesters.
  ----------------------------------
  BTW, the letter from the law professor was claiming that the Republican claims of the amnesty exec order being unconstitutional, is just a red herring and has no legal foundation. Another case of someone not living in the real world, but in academia.

  • poppajoe, don't you know that it's a-ok for non-white ppl to do whatever they want, for the simple reason tis impossible for non-whites to be racist/prejudicial, whereas ANYthing white ppl do is necessarily racist/prejudicial.

    apparently.

• "non-people of color" that makes no sense. what's a non-people but an animal, and animals can't read. I think someone needs to concentrate more on proper language skills and put the social upheaval movement on the back burner.

  • From many of the actions we see, can these protesting types really be called people?

• The more the decent and civilized people let this go on the more will go on.

  There is one common thread of all of these "movements" since Obama has been elected, to distract form what Obama and his fascist allies in the democrat party and the media are doing to our country. Since 2007 when the fascist democrats took over congress the lives of all Americans but for the very few elites has deteriorated terribly. The black and woman movements now are all about deflecting the fact that 10 million illegals are about to rape our social safety net by the diktat of one man, Obama.

• Well aren't these "special snowflakes"? Imagine a protest where whites said no blacks allowed? The Holder DOJ SWAT team would be flying in black helicopters, M-Wraps would be rolling in, and TSA gloving up and fondling everyone to make sure they didn't have any evil guns.. And the protesters would be called terrorists.

• The true definition of a racist. Baring someone, or hating someone solely based on the color of their skin. PERFECT!!!

• Love how cultural-marxist white trash and hippie baby boomers got beaten up trying to do that.

• More tolerance from those calling for tolerance.