Now that Harry Reid is not in control liberals want Senate abolished

Now that Harry Reid is not in control, liberals want Senate abolished. Oddly, they never said a word about this before.

J.P. Travis: Born and raised in Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1976 graduate of University of Michigan, father, grandfather, husband, founder and CEO of Travelyn Publishing (http://www.travelynpublishing.com/), and passionate anti-government believer in individual liberty.

View Comments (27)

  • OT, I closed my eyes and picked a thread. I quit posting these since Alien finally got rich after one of his apps or games caught on and stopped visiting, but this one fascinates me & couldn't resist.
    "Massive hurricane on Saturn. Two Earths could fit inside it"

    http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/2315435/84406968.jpg

    And did you catch this? (Hey nss, it freaking snowed & it's frigid outside (17), I'm supposed to go work in it? I haven't even cleared the driveway yet. So basically I blew the day off and staying right here, scouring the depths of the interwebz... and maybe a Blue Moon, or three)

    http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2015/01/06/moment-fireworks-factory-explodes-caught-film

    [don't click the vid, but the picture at the top pretty much says it all]

  • Note that there are no options to comment/reply to this idiotic crap. That's the way progressives control the narrative, by abolishing it to begin with. The moronic author might take note of the fact that the seats up for grabs generally weren't in the highly concentrated urban areas with large blocs of generally liberal voters. If NYC, Chi-Town, SF and LA dropped off the map, the political landscape in DC would look much different immediately.

  • "The problem is that the deck is stacked in favor of small states, which receive equal representation in the Senate despite dramatic variance in population."

    Democrats claim they are for the little guy, in this case it would be smaller states, and they usually, want equality u bar al-as, except when it doesn't work in their favor. I'm not surprised, but I it is astounding how little this people see their own hypocrisy.

  • The same bunch of brain damaged liberals would rather be ruled by a dictator, because they're too lazy to think for themselves.

      • yes, and i see that whenever someone libtardian moves from a high-tax state (like California) to a low(er)-tax state (like in the south). the first thing they complain about is that their new state doesn't have all the accoutrements as their former state did, and so then they commence organizing for various programs and facilities which require more taxes. of course, they decided to move to this new state mainly so they'd experience a windfall for the sale of their over-priced property in that other state and experience a lower real estate tax, but you know... it doesn't take long before they miss having all the freebies that require higher taxes and prices.

        infiltration, as most of this crap that's going on should be called...
        this way, both ends of Rome go down in flames while the idiots stare in wonderment.

      • Very dumb. Destructively dumb. Senators uses to HAVE to listen to their state legislatures. Now most of them couldn't name two people in their state legislature.

        • I wish there was a clause input into the original Constitution that stopped Congress from passing laws that directly benefited them over the populace. The 17th amendment was a big one of those. Pay raises, insider trading, etc.

  • I didn't know a person could go to so much effort with charts and statistics and still come up stupid.

    Apparently Vox flunked US government class.