Obama Announces Large-Scale Gun Grab That Will Affect 4.2 Million SSA Recipients

View Comments (17)

• They do this not because they could, or they should, or because there's a need. They do this because they can.

• One more point.
  When was the last time you heard about a SSA recipient going on a mass shooting spree? The only thing I could find about any such thing happening in the US, was a story in Motherfvcker Jones website, claiming 4 seniors planned shooting up a Waffle House to save the Constitution, which considering the source, proves it's BS.

• Treasodent Obamagogue knows exactly what he's doing.

  • http://liberallogic101.com/?p=28729

• I have a theory as to why he is going after the SSA recipients.
  When they pass away, their guns go to their families. The government can't track them then. Many of those old enough to be on SSA, are also old enough to have purchased their weapons before licensing and registration was required, so the goobermint has no record of these weapons. Now, if he starts taking them away from the elderly, they can't be passed down. The goobermint reduces the number of guns they can't track, and when they decide to turn us into a full blown Communist shithole, they can confiscate all the rest of the guns, because they know where they are.

  • You said it better than I could poppa, right on the money.

    I get my first check in a week but as far as the SS gestapo knows I do not own any guns. Intuition? I don't know but I never bought anything from a dealer after registration became mandatory. (snicker)

  • Excellent analysis.

  • A very good theory. Trying to think like the enemy is always a good tactic.

• First they came for the guns in Socialist run cities, and I did not speak out—
  Because I was not in a Socialist run city.

  Then they came for the guns of those on depression medication, and I did not speak out—
  Because I was not on depression medication.

  Then they came for the guns of Social Security recipients who lack the mental capacity to manage their own affairs for any reason and to any degree, and I did not speak out—
  Because I have the mental capacity to manage my own affairs.

  Then they came for my guns—and there was no one left to help defend my rights.

  Seeing the same pattern here as Pastor Martin Niemöllers poem about Germans following the Nazis' rise to power.

  • Pastor Martin Niemöller approves.

• http://earloftaint.com/2015/07/18/this-is-no-time-for-a-muslim-tongue-bath/

• President Dickhead is going to keep pushing until someone snaps somewhere and does some stupid shit. Then it will be all hands on board and everyones guns will be at risk. Too bad the president never read the F*cking constitution.

  • Oh, the f*cker read it all right. ...and if you'd have been there at the time, you'd have heard him say "This has to go; I won't do that, I can't allow people to do this, and certainly, we can't tell them that we're going to take it all away."

    He's a "constitutional scholar" in the same way that an arsonist is an "architect".

    • I'm sure he's studied it. A person has to know their enemy.

  • That's the whole plan, disarm the legal owners, makes it that much easier to control them.

• This is a complete load of crap!
  I see a future where we will have a country completely free of LEGALLY OWNED GUNS and the only guns held will be by the military, the police, and the criminals.
  What I don't hear is anyone from the government talking about reimbursing any gun owners for the value of their gun collections when the government takes them away. It seems to me that if you are not a criminal, and for some other reason, you are divested of your right to own a gun, isn't there a provision whereby they must pay you the value of your property?

  • Don't forget Poppa, they are progressive communists; to them, the only right you have is to stand in line for your quarter pound of moldy bread, four ounces of gubment cheese and then go to the gubment's compulsory voting booths and vote Demoncrap!