Obamas EPA experimented on human guinea pigs

Obama’s EPA experimented on human guinea pigs. This story is a microcosm of what happens to government under liberals. The EPA treated human beings like guinea pigs, making them breathe what they thought were deadly doses of particulates, and then lied about the results when nobody died. Moral of the story: human lives and scientific integrity are worth nothing – political goals are worth everything.

J.P. Travis: Born and raised in Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1976 graduate of University of Michigan, father, grandfather, husband, founder and CEO of Travelyn Publishing (http://www.travelynpublishing.com/), and passionate anti-government believer in individual liberty.

View Comments (17)

  • Before 'O' was even elected, I informed family and friends that 'he' scared me.
    Then I was asked what could one man do and informed them just wait and see. He apparently is doing much more than I ever thought and is surrounded by like-minded people. May America wake up on November 6, 2012!!!

    • He's doing a lot more than he should be able to do, and it's because a lot of enablers on both side of the aisle are allowing it to happen.

  • WOW I thought Joseph Mengele had died some years ago. Where is the out cry from this piece of science experiment? PETA clamors about testing on animals but nothing about doing it to humans

    • First, PETA is not concerned with the welfare of animals. They hate humans much more than they love animals. Their focus is on harming humans, not saving animals.

      Second, this story will most likely NEVER get any further that it's original web post. The five of us that have commented here and the few who saw it on Junk Science will be the only ones who care. Like PETA, the green nazis that run our government don't love the earth near as much as they love power and hate humans.

  • Very poor communist methodology on the EPA's part. They should have hidden the contradictory results much better and made an example out of the poor serf that dared to come out with results that didn't match the party line (well, maybe they did this part, it wasn't reported). How do they expect to micromanage a state with such sloppy work?