Pelosi: I’ll reveal information on Gingrich ‘when the time is right.’ Knowing Queen Nancy she’ll tell us we won’t be able to read it until after we vote for Newt.
This post was last modified on November 10, 2021
Pelosi: I’ll reveal information on Gingrich ‘when the time is right.’ Knowing Queen Nancy she’ll tell us we won’t be able to read it until after we vote for Newt.
This post was last modified on November 10, 2021
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (24)
"when the time is right" When is that? If she really has serious information for the betterment of the country (not just her own party) then she should be blabbbing it everywhere. If not, shut up. And as far as ethics violations, I don't think the Democrats have much room for accusing others. Seriously, Pots, meet Kettle.
She is going to tweet a picture of Newt's wiener she took while hiding in the men's locker-room at the capital. That's how she spends her time and that's why she didn't know what was in the health care bill....It's hard to read in the linen closet when you looking thru a peephole.
As long as she doesn't get mixed up and tweet Hillary's wiener instead.
I'd like to see somebody find some of Ole' Plastic Face's dirty deals, and put them out there. From what I understand Her and her husband are Billionaires.
Maybe she'll reveal how Newt blocked voted on bills that would reduce profits for stocks that he had recently got in on the IPOs for. Ooops, wrong speaker.
she's a pig
Too polite on your part. She is a corrupt, win at all costs, progressive a-hole.
Her big secret is that he was present for her latest face lift.
What I'm tired of is the MSM attempting to cherry pick the Republican nominee and the Republican Party letting them do it. I say, lets just have an old fashion knock down drag out. Best person wins. Screw all these damn primaries and caucuses.
Just have one day for voting, winner takes all. Who ever gets 51% of all the votes is the big winner and then the focus can turn to defeating the empty suit that is currently in the White House.
I don't understand how poll numbers of Republican primary voters are affected by MSM, unless you think FoxNews is part of it?
Seems to me like Republican primary voters are fully capable of making up their own minds. Is this not the case?
It's the middle that decides elections, Alien. And the middle is being lied to.
True that, for most.. But does the middle vote in Iowa caucuses? I sure don't.
No, but nobody wants to put in a candidate that is unelectable, either. Therefore, a lot of attention is paid to what the middle thinks. This onslaught of stories about "Mitt, the front runner", and "Mitt, the presidential-looking candidate" is skewing that, and it is wholly intentional. Exactly like how, when unemployment was holding steady at 3.5% under W, the stories were all about growing unemployment, and now that it is about 20% (I include the people that have given up), the stories are about how things are improving.
Journalists don't have to write ham-handedly slanted stories to demonstrate journalistic malpractice -- they are perfectly capable of manipulating public opinion by changing standards of what they report on. W's popularity was holding steady at ~20 to 30% for years, all the while it was presented as falling, and Congress' was at 14%. Why not report on that? Well, it was a Democrat congress, wouldn't do to mention that as bad as W was seen, Congress was worse...
All of the positive coverage of Mitt makes me want to puke. I don't think he's the best candidate by a long shot. His attempt to minimize RomneyCare is ludicrous -- foolish at best. He could have dealt with the issue and had the Tea Party accepting it and loving him for it with one statement*. Instead he is trying to pander to what some oddball echo chamber of "Republican Values Experts" who don't have any idea at all what our values are. Much like trying to get votes by stirring up gay hatred, instead of focusing upon good government.
*No, I'm not his mother, so what that statement is is an exercise for the reader. Not that it matters, anymore -- he's already thrown a cornerstone of his governorship under the bus, he'd look like a total moron trying to backpedal on it.
Her big secret is that he was present for her latest face lift.
What I’m tired of is the MSM attempting to cherry pick the Republican nominee and the Republican Party letting them do it. I say, lets just have an old fashion knock down drag out. Best person wins. Screw all these damn primaries and caucuses.
Just have one day for voting, winner takes all. Who ever gets 51% of all the votes is the big winner and then the focus can turn to defeating the empty suit that is currently in the White House.
*********************
Considering how many of your heroes have turned out to have feet of clay already, that sounds like a really, really dumb strategy for the GOP. ;>)
I'd pay money to watch it! :>D
What this proves is that the Liberals/communist/progressives are the enemy and cannot be reasoned or worse compromised with. They must be beat and we will have to stoop to their level to win. If we keep taking the 'high road' then the country will be over as we know it.
The Liberals/communist/progressives will scorch the earth to get their two tiered populace in place. We have to fight fire with fire because the world they want to bring about is EVIL.
"Evil"? Because we want to see ALL Americans, not just the wealthy and powerful, have an opportunity to improve their lot in life? And because we have serious misgivings about a serial adulterer, who's been sanctioned multiple times for ethics violations (including by his own party) in the past, now being embraced by the GOP?
That's a curious attitude. But, then again, today's far right embraces a backwards-and-upside-down view of the facts. So of course some of you are going to say that objecting to unethical politicians is "evil." And, what's more, you'll believe it.
Because we want to see ALL Americans, not just the wealthy and powerful, have an opportunity to improve their lot in life?
Please oh delusional one, show me how only the rich have an opportunity to improve their lot in life!
I guess the guy that works his way up from the inside in a company to become an executive was rich when he started out?
What about all the women that they keep featuring on the morning "news" shows that started their own company with just an idea?
There are millions of "rags to riches" success stories in this country, but because a relative few are either too lazy, drugged up, or stupid to improve themselves, you make it sound like nobody can succeed!
She wants equality for everyone -- just like in North Korea.
You don't seem to have a problem with serial adulterer Bill Clinton. And he was impeached! Not to mention the legal issues with the Whitewater affair and all his other shady business deals. So Newt is up there with your favorite. Personally, I don't think he has a chance in hell, but youhave no room to talk about the quality of his candidacy after your undying support of Clinton.
Oh please, please let it be devastating! If we get stuck with Gingrich...if we the people actually choose him as the Republican nominee we deserve what we get. He is an opportunist plain and simple. He will play to whoever's payroll he's on. He is a RINO. He has major morality issues and sold out the Tea party candidate for Dede Scozzafuzzybear because she was a "Republican". He will do what is politically expedient. Oh dear God please let the voters come to their senses before this travesty of a candidate becomes the nominee...
He is even more an opportunist then McCain
It couold be worse. You could be getting Rick Perry.
I want to hear more about this.
http://yourjewishnews.com/13894.aspx
Wow! One former House Speaker to another! Now you know they fear Newt if they are going to wait until they see how far he gets in the Nomination process before they release the dirt... Or else they have nothing and want us to think they do... You know what? I bet it is top secret stuff from when he was speaker. It would be just up her alley to do some crud like that!
I'm sure Newt is just trembling in his boots (sarc)!!!
Anyone think he has enough on Pelosi to start an ethics investigation?