Police state: CA county censors government employee who dares criticize Obamacare

CA county censors government employee who dares criticize Obamacare. Story is she said something about people having policies cancelled due to Obamacare then was allegedly reprimanded “because an unidentified person had overheard the small talk and been offended.” The “offendee” is likely to need medical treatment come 2014 – if he/she can still get it.

Bonfire of the Absurdities: After 35 year career writing software for IBM mainframes, am now self-employed contractor thinking of joining a union and striking for higher wages. Cured morbid fear of heights when I learned to look at them as lengths standing on end. Uncompromising in refusal to accept browser cookies. Amateur investor who has accumulated a small fortune in the market after starting out years ago with a large one. For recreation, I run, hike, kayak and play tennis but will not consider synchronized swimming under any circumstances.

View Comments (17)

  • "Classic democrat coward & control-freak behavior." = Classic Cloward-Piven strategy. That's actually how I saw it when I first read your post.

  • Classic democrat coward & control-freak behavior. Slink around behind the backs of people and spread snippy comments and hate. Attack any non-party thinking. These cowards are always enraged and indignant about any thought not in their petty little minds. Or thoughts that will point out flaws in the "perfect in their mind" policies of idiocy they promote.

    Control freaks, cowards, cheaters, liars, and thieves = leftists, democrats, progressives

  • Since this is California, I expect the person complaining (stating facts) about one of the governments great programs needs to sent to the Re-education Center for brainwash...er ah training.

  • Not sure how a fact or a truth would offend someone and merits censorship or a reproval. If she wasn't offending anyone (truly offending) she was just stating a fact that is appropriate. Another example of liberals hating the truth.

    • Just like our favorite troll. Snoops around in other people's conversation, then gets offended. My feeling is wjat I say to someone else is none of your freaking business. And if you were skulking around and overheard something you didin't like, to f***ing bad! Shouldn't have been eavesdropping to begin with!

  • Fere speech is only for the left not for everyone. Here is the best way to handle a formal complaint (bitching). If they will put their name to it then it is a formal complaint. If they don't, its just bitching and venting so there is nothing to be taken seriously.

    • My first (maybe second) thought too, "...dressed her down for the attempt at chitchat because an unidentified person had overheard the small talk and been offended."
      Coward.

  • Quagmire's thought police are everywhere, I bet the snitch is a full time participant on Quagmire's See something, say something site.

  • Sounds like a case right up the ACLU's alley if you ask me. off

    [edit] "They are now contemplating legal action." And First Amendment Sensitivity Training for that supervisor and all senior management is a non-negotiable requirement in any settlement if I were involved.