Sally Kohn on GOP Debate: Hey look, it’s 10 men standing on a stage arguing why they should get to control women’s bodies and choices. In Kohn’s mind the freedom of choice over our actions and bodies is absolute. Unless of course you want to opt out of Obamacare, own a bakery or are not a pregnant woman. In which case you are clearly the property of the state and had better get back to making her a cake.
View Comments (15)
This just in: I'm 92% trump and86% gop. Legalize herb
Isn't she named after a disease they always talk about on TV? Kohn's? I think it has something to do with poop and constant diarrhea....and cramps......
Are you thinking about Crohn's disease?
Yup..Just a little sarc on her name, she also could cause the same symptoms after prolonged watching...
I have to admit that if I was a lesbian this woman would NOT be attractive to me at all. I mean seriously... she's fugly. I don't know how any woman I don't care how lesbian she is finds that attractive. If she was a man... fugly. She don't look good either way. Terrible. I am sorry I am just being real.
The argument "It's my body, don't tell me what I can and can't do with it" is interesting coming from the politicial party of "It's my slave, don't tell me what I can and can't do with it."
Amounts to, Since fetuses have no voice they have no rights. How dare any man to speak up for them.
Interesting that most of the postsf on her account are hers. Very few followers apparently. I am not an abortion as birth control supporter. I do believe there are clear medical reasons for abotions, usually when the child's disorders are not compatible with life. I stll say the fathers should have a say. Women have bitched for millenia that guys hit and run. So now many are trying to take responsibilities, but women shriek it is their decision alone. You don't w a nt kids? We have the most effective birth control options in the history of mankind. Your choice was back when you decided to have sex. Use birth control, or don't f#@$?.
"Interesting that most of the posts on her account are hers." Same reason CNN has no viewers.... :)
Personally I feel that I will let G-D decide if the child's disorder is not compatible with life and allow the child to run his or her natural life. I know a woman who was raped by a cousin and she got pregnant and she gave birth to a child that he was supposed to die when he was in his early teens due to congenital incompatibilities with life. He is now 34 years old... sure life is not "easy" for him nor his Mother, but she would rather him be here with her that NOT be here with her. Her only child. Someone for her to love an care for. That is her nature. She loves him and it doesn't matter that his life is incompatible with life: he will never be healthy, he will never be married, have children, etc. etc. etc. , but he has a life and she prefers that and he could have easily have died at any moment from the moment he was born till now, but he still is alive. She could have aborted him and "save" herself from the struggle or bother or problems, but I can guarantee you that the idea alone would horrify her. She would prefer her child still. Again... I would leave it to G-D to decide how long or short the child's live will be as many times a fetus who is truly incompatible with life is miscarried.
If the Mother's life is imminent danger and more than one doctor agrees, I can understand her (and her husband/companion/family) making the joint decision to terminate the pregnancy, I cannot ask a woman to commit suicide.
Exactly. As the old joke goes, when the woman went to her doctor and asked for 100% effective birth control, he reached into his lunch box, pulled out an apple and gave it to her. She said "That's amazing! When do I eat it? Before, during, or after?"
The doctor smiled and said "Instead".
RKae on Sally Kohn: Hey, look! It's a woman telling me why she needs to murder a human being that's been placed in her responsibility.
She will do so after she explains why she will impose her sexual choices upon her children... she actually said she wants her children to be gay.
"...placed in her responsibility" implies that some invisible monster placed this child in her womb, as opposed to the inevitable consequence of actions she participated in. Maybe she thinks that God did it. As I told the woman when she was cursing me and blaming me when giving birth, "I seem to recall you were there at the conception and didn't have a problem with it at the time."
perlcat to Sally Kohn: Hate to break it to ya, missy, but God most likely wouldn't choose a lefty god-hater for any potential virgin births.
Apparently you only have rights if you are pregnant, which excludes the babies from the whole deal.