Thank you gays for bringing us to this

Polygamy.jpg


Thank you, gays, for bringing us to this. A federal judge just ruled that Utah’s anti-polygamy law is unconstitutional, apparently feeling that “plural families” should have the same privacy and due process rights gays and lesbians have wangled. Next up: brothers marrying sisters, men marrying goats, and spousal health insurance for rubber dolls.

J.P. Travis: Born and raised in Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1976 graduate of University of Michigan, father, grandfather, husband, founder and CEO of Travelyn Publishing (http://www.travelynpublishing.com/), and passionate anti-government believer in individual liberty.

View Comments (71)

  • Legalized incest will be next, within a ten year period I'll bet. There's no stopping it now.
    Human-animal unions will take them longer, but they'll happen rest assured, it's all part of the libtard plans to destroy this country.

  • "spousal health insurance for rubber dolls."

    Already have that. It's called the road hazard warranty. [rimshot]

  • Talk about a gluten for punishment. Multiple wives at the same time. Wonder why the NAGs are quite? Notice one man, multiple women.

    As for the judge legislating from the bench, they've been doing it for decades and most politicians just go along with it. Federal judgeships are suppose to be for life and unless impeached from the bench (damn near impossible), its getting close to time to revisit that life time appointment. After a decade, they should be reviewed for judicial temperance.

  • Another federal judge legislating from the bench. Even when the people are allowed to vote in the matter, one of these holier then thou appointed assholes change the ruling.

  • The ability to marry goats would bring us a large influx of muslim immigrants.......and yes, I saw more muslim males molesting various farm animals in Iraq and the Stan than ya'll would believe...

  • Perphaps the government shouldn't discriminate and actively prevent people who want to be married to many people at once... perhaps... I personally don't like it, but perhaps the government shouldn't have these limitations for some and then not have limitations for others. Every government and society needs to make a decision as to the kind of government/society it wishes to be. However... with that said, all noble and benign governments should have ways to protect individual natural rights of individual private citizens and their associations and communities from ACTIVIST groups that wishes to enforce their ways upon the rest of the citizenry, who are willing to TOLERATE just want to exercise their rights to not have to accept it.

    My ONLY TRUE CONCERN is for individual citizens and associations and religious entities. Will we (all) be FORCED to accept this in our midst? THAT is the question. Will my church community be outside of the law for denying marriages that are clearly OUTSIDE of the church belief system? In CLEAR violation of our rights of free expression of religion?

    This is the problem here.

    However like everything else G-d has already foreseen this. So we (believers) have to hold on fast to our believes at great costs if we want to persevere and hold on, onto the end.

    Not going to post all of Daniel 7 but this situation reminds me of this:

    "24 The ten horns are ten kings who will come from this kingdom. After them another king will arise, different from the earlier ones; he will subdue three kings. 25 He will speak against the Most High and oppress his holy people and try to change the set times and the laws. The holy people will be delivered into his hands for a time, times and half a time."

    The mark of the Beast can be anything. Perhaps acceptance of laws that go against G-d even by force can fit the bill... We just need to make a decision (by we I mean believers). Even those that have no believe in G-d need to make a decision to be free people or not...

    http://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-government.html